Diagnostic accuracy of a new fully automated chemiluminescence immunoassay for anti-SARS-CoV-2 combined IgG and IgM antibody detection

D. Villalta, P. Martelli, A. Moratto, Valeria Salgarolo, Elita Ligato, R. Giacomello, M. Conte, F. D'Aurizio, M. Fabris, D. Fontana, Rita De Rosa
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of a new fully automated chemiluminescence immunoassay for anti-SARS-CoV-2 combined IgG and IgM antibody detection","authors":"D. Villalta, P. Martelli, A. Moratto, Valeria Salgarolo, Elita Ligato, R. Giacomello, M. Conte, F. D'Aurizio, M. Fabris, D. Fontana, Rita De Rosa","doi":"10.23736/s1825-859x.20.00076-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recently many serological assays for the detection of antibodies to SARS-COV-2 virus were introduced to the market. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of a novel fully automated CLIA assay for combined (anti-IgG and IgM) anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection. Methods: A total of 231 sera, 100 from consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 confirmed by rRT-PCR using nasopharyngeal swabs (54 mild, 32 severe and 14 critical) and 131 controls (50 blood donors, 49 autoimmune diseases, and 32 with other viral diseases) were evaluated for combined (IgG plus IgM) anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with the ADVIA Centaur® COV2T (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) immunoassay. In the same sera anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies were also tested using the MAGLUMI® (SNIBE, Shenzhen, China) immunoassay. Results: Based on the manufacturer's cutoff, sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, PPV and NPV of the ADVIA Centaur COV2T assay were 91% (95% CI: 83.6-95.1), 100% (97.1-100), 121.6, 0.10, 100% and 92.8%, respectively. Sensitivity of the combined antibody assay was slightly higher than that obtained by combining the results of the separate anti-IgM and anti-IgG assays (91% vs. 89% in all patients), especially in mild COVID-19 patients (85.2% vs. 81.5%). A significant difference in antibody levels (ratio) between mild and severe/critical subjects has been shown. Conclusions: The novel ADVIA Centaur COV2T assay for anti-SARS-CoV-2 combined antibody detection showed good diagnostic accuracy and, associated with the elevated automation and throughput of the system, may represent a useful tool for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":18004,"journal":{"name":"La Rivista Italiana della Medicina di Laboratorio - Italian Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La Rivista Italiana della Medicina di Laboratorio - Italian Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/s1825-859x.20.00076-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recently many serological assays for the detection of antibodies to SARS-COV-2 virus were introduced to the market. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of a novel fully automated CLIA assay for combined (anti-IgG and IgM) anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection. Methods: A total of 231 sera, 100 from consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 confirmed by rRT-PCR using nasopharyngeal swabs (54 mild, 32 severe and 14 critical) and 131 controls (50 blood donors, 49 autoimmune diseases, and 32 with other viral diseases) were evaluated for combined (IgG plus IgM) anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with the ADVIA Centaur® COV2T (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) immunoassay. In the same sera anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies were also tested using the MAGLUMI® (SNIBE, Shenzhen, China) immunoassay. Results: Based on the manufacturer's cutoff, sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, PPV and NPV of the ADVIA Centaur COV2T assay were 91% (95% CI: 83.6-95.1), 100% (97.1-100), 121.6, 0.10, 100% and 92.8%, respectively. Sensitivity of the combined antibody assay was slightly higher than that obtained by combining the results of the separate anti-IgM and anti-IgG assays (91% vs. 89% in all patients), especially in mild COVID-19 patients (85.2% vs. 81.5%). A significant difference in antibody levels (ratio) between mild and severe/critical subjects has been shown. Conclusions: The novel ADVIA Centaur COV2T assay for anti-SARS-CoV-2 combined antibody detection showed good diagnostic accuracy and, associated with the elevated automation and throughput of the system, may represent a useful tool for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型全自动化学发光免疫分析法对抗sars - cov -2联合IgG和IgM抗体检测的诊断准确性
背景:近年来,许多用于检测SARS-COV-2病毒抗体的血清学检测方法进入市场。本研究的目的是评估一种新型全自动CLIA联合(抗igg和IgM)抗sars - cov -2抗体检测的诊断性能。方法:采用ADVIA Centaur®COV2T (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany)免疫分析法,对经鼻咽拭子rRT-PCR确诊的连续COVID-19患者的231份血清(轻度54份,重度32份,危重14份)和131份对照(献血者50份,自身免疫性疾病49份,其他病毒性疾病32份)进行联合(IgG + IgM)抗sars - cov -2抗体检测。在相同的血清中,还使用MAGLUMI®(SNIBE,深圳,中国)免疫分析法检测抗sars - cov -2的IgM和IgG抗体。结果:基于制造商的截止值,ADVIA Centaur COV2T检测的灵敏度、特异性、LR+、LR-、PPV和NPV分别为91% (95% CI: 83.6-95.1)、100%(97.1-100)、121.6、0.10、100%和92.8%。联合抗体检测结果的敏感性略高于单独抗igm和抗igg检测结果的敏感性(91%比89%),特别是在轻度COVID-19患者中(85.2%比81.5%)。在轻度和严重/危重受试者之间的抗体水平(比率)有显著差异。结论:新型ADVIA Centaur COV2T抗- cov -2联合抗体检测方法具有良好的诊断准确性,且系统自动化程度和通量提高,可能是临床抗- cov -2抗体检测的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
I marcatori sierologici del morbo di Addison autoimmune Association between microRNA and the diagnosis and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review La seconda lista Choosing Wisely della Società Italiana di Patologia Clinica e Medicina di Laboratorio (2023) e la Medicina Un interessante cluster linfocitario Un caso di artrocentesi da ginocchio, con presenza di cristalli inusuali di ematoidina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1