Prognostic Performance of the Derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

T. Gambichler, Rita Mansour, C. Scheel, Shayda Said, N. Abu Rached, L. Susok
{"title":"Prognostic Performance of the Derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors","authors":"T. Gambichler, Rita Mansour, C. Scheel, Shayda Said, N. Abu Rached, L. Susok","doi":"10.3390/dermato2020003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose was to evaluate the prognostic performance of the derived neutrophil–to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma (CM) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We retrospectively investigated 41 CM patients with stage IV disease who had the indication for treatment with ICI. dNLR as well as NLR were routinely determined prior to the start of ICI treatment. The dNLR and NLR were calculated as follows: dNLR = absolute neutrophil counts (ANC)/white blood cell count −ANC and NRL = ANC/absolute lymphocyte counts, respectively. Follow-up of the patients was performed in line with current guidelines. In univariate analysis, dNLR (p = 0.027 and p = 0.032) as well as NLR (p = 0.0023 and p = 0.0036) were the only parameters which were significantly associated with the best overall response (BOR) and disease control rate (DCR) on ROC curve analyses. NLR negatively correlated with CM-specific survival (r = −0.32, p = 0.043). CM-specific deaths were significantly associated with the absence of immune-related adverse events (p = 0.043), elevated S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) at baseline (p = 0.0006), and dNLR (p = 0.024). In multivariate analyses, NLR was the only significant independent predictor for BOR (p = 0.014; odds ratio: 1.7; and 95% CI 1.11 to 2.61) and DCR (p = 0.019; odds ratio: 1.5; and 95% CI 1.07 to 2.19). Regarding CM-specific death, however, normal baseline S100B was the only significant independent predictor (p = 0.0020; odds ratio: 0.074; and 95% CI 0.014 to 0.38) for survival. Our data demonstrate that baseline NLR seems to be superior to dNLR in the prediction of ICI response in CM patients.","PeriodicalId":11115,"journal":{"name":"Dermato-Endocrinology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermato-Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dermato2020003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate the prognostic performance of the derived neutrophil–to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma (CM) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We retrospectively investigated 41 CM patients with stage IV disease who had the indication for treatment with ICI. dNLR as well as NLR were routinely determined prior to the start of ICI treatment. The dNLR and NLR were calculated as follows: dNLR = absolute neutrophil counts (ANC)/white blood cell count −ANC and NRL = ANC/absolute lymphocyte counts, respectively. Follow-up of the patients was performed in line with current guidelines. In univariate analysis, dNLR (p = 0.027 and p = 0.032) as well as NLR (p = 0.0023 and p = 0.0036) were the only parameters which were significantly associated with the best overall response (BOR) and disease control rate (DCR) on ROC curve analyses. NLR negatively correlated with CM-specific survival (r = −0.32, p = 0.043). CM-specific deaths were significantly associated with the absence of immune-related adverse events (p = 0.043), elevated S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) at baseline (p = 0.0006), and dNLR (p = 0.024). In multivariate analyses, NLR was the only significant independent predictor for BOR (p = 0.014; odds ratio: 1.7; and 95% CI 1.11 to 2.61) and DCR (p = 0.019; odds ratio: 1.5; and 95% CI 1.07 to 2.19). Regarding CM-specific death, however, normal baseline S100B was the only significant independent predictor (p = 0.0020; odds ratio: 0.074; and 95% CI 0.014 to 0.38) for survival. Our data demonstrate that baseline NLR seems to be superior to dNLR in the prediction of ICI response in CM patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫检查点抑制剂治疗IV期黑色素瘤患者衍生中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率的预后表现
目的是评估在接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的转移性皮肤黑色素瘤(CM)患者中衍生中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(dNLR)的预后表现。我们回顾性调查了41例有ICI治疗指征的IV期CM患者。在ICI治疗开始前常规测定dNLR和NLR。dNLR和NLR计算公式如下:dNLR =绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)/白细胞计数- ANC和NRL = ANC/绝对淋巴细胞计数。按照现行指南对患者进行随访。在单因素分析中,dNLR (p = 0.027和p = 0.032)和NLR (p = 0.0023和p = 0.0036)是ROC曲线分析中唯一与最佳总反应(BOR)和疾病控制率(DCR)显著相关的参数。NLR与cm特异性生存率呈负相关(r = - 0.32, p = 0.043)。cm特异性死亡与无免疫相关不良事件(p = 0.043)、基线时S100钙结合蛋白B (S100B)升高(p = 0.0006)和dNLR (p = 0.024)显著相关。在多变量分析中,NLR是BOR的唯一显著独立预测因子(p = 0.014;优势比:1.7;95% CI 1.11 ~ 2.61)和DCR (p = 0.019;优势比:1.5;95% CI 1.07 ~ 2.19)。然而,对于cm特异性死亡,正常基线S100B是唯一显著的独立预测因子(p = 0.0020;优势比:0.074;95% CI为0.014 ~ 0.38)。我们的数据表明,基线NLR在预测CM患者ICI反应方面似乎优于dNLR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rosacea: An Overview of Its Etiological Factors, Pathogenesis, Classification and Therapy Options A Case of Paraneoplastic Anti-TIF1-γ Antibody-Positive Dermatomyositis Presenting with Generalized Edema and Associated with Aortic Aneurysm Post-COVID Kawasaki-like Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome Complicated by Herpes Simplex Virus-1 in a Two-Year-Old Child Sex-Dependent Skin Aging and Rejuvenation Strategies BASCULE Syndrome Associated with Autoantibodies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1