A Study of Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: Transphenoidal Microscopic Versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach

H. Nath, K. Barua, K. H. Uddin, Monirul Islam, O. Faruque, Atiqur Rahman, S. Bari, Rahul Quddus
{"title":"A Study of Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: Transphenoidal Microscopic Versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach","authors":"H. Nath, K. Barua, K. H. Uddin, Monirul Islam, O. Faruque, Atiqur Rahman, S. Bari, Rahul Quddus","doi":"10.3329/bjn.v31i1.57372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Transphenoidal endoscopic approach is minimal invasive surgery in case of pituitary adenoma. \nObjective : To see the outcome of transphenoidal endoscopic and microscopic approach in case of pituitary tumor. \nResults : This study showed among the 37 patients, 25 (67.6%) were done by transphenoidal microscopic approach and 12 (32.4%) patients were done by endonasal endoscopic approach. Among the 12 patients 8(66.7%) were male and 4(33.3%) were female. Among the 25, patients 15(60%) were male and 10(40%) were female. It was documented that in 12 patients, 10(83.3%) were macroadenoma and 2(16.7%) were microadenoma. It was evident that among the 25 patient 18(72%) were macroadenoma and 7(28%) were microadenoma. Among 12 patients, 11 (91.7%) had preoperative visual disturbance and 1(8.3%) had normal vision. It was observed that among 25 patients, 23(92%) patients had preoperative visual disturbance and 2 (8%) patients had normal vision. Tumor was totally removed in 9(75%) patients in endoscopic approach and 14(56%) in microscopic approach. Clinically 10(83.3%) patients were improved in endoscopically and 16(64%) patients were improved in microscopic group. \nConclusion: It was concluded that endoscopic endonasal approach is better than transphenoidal microscopic approach. \nBangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2015; Vol. 31 (1): 21-29","PeriodicalId":8727,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjn.v31i1.57372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transphenoidal endoscopic approach is minimal invasive surgery in case of pituitary adenoma. Objective : To see the outcome of transphenoidal endoscopic and microscopic approach in case of pituitary tumor. Results : This study showed among the 37 patients, 25 (67.6%) were done by transphenoidal microscopic approach and 12 (32.4%) patients were done by endonasal endoscopic approach. Among the 12 patients 8(66.7%) were male and 4(33.3%) were female. Among the 25, patients 15(60%) were male and 10(40%) were female. It was documented that in 12 patients, 10(83.3%) were macroadenoma and 2(16.7%) were microadenoma. It was evident that among the 25 patient 18(72%) were macroadenoma and 7(28%) were microadenoma. Among 12 patients, 11 (91.7%) had preoperative visual disturbance and 1(8.3%) had normal vision. It was observed that among 25 patients, 23(92%) patients had preoperative visual disturbance and 2 (8%) patients had normal vision. Tumor was totally removed in 9(75%) patients in endoscopic approach and 14(56%) in microscopic approach. Clinically 10(83.3%) patients were improved in endoscopically and 16(64%) patients were improved in microscopic group. Conclusion: It was concluded that endoscopic endonasal approach is better than transphenoidal microscopic approach. Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2015; Vol. 31 (1): 21-29
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
垂体腺瘤手术的研究:经蝶窦显微与鼻内内镜入路
背景:经蝶窦内镜入路是治疗垂体腺瘤的微创手术。目的:探讨经蝶窦入路和镜下入路治疗垂体肿瘤的效果。结果:本组37例患者中,经蝶窦镜入路25例(67.6%),经鼻内镜入路12例(32.4%)。12例中男性8例(66.7%),女性4例(33.3%)。25例患者中男性15例(60%),女性10例(40%)。12例患者中,大腺瘤10例(83.3%),微腺瘤2例(16.7%)。25例患者中,大腺瘤18例(72%),微腺瘤7例(28%)。12例患者术前视力障碍11例(91.7%),视力正常1例(8.3%)。25例患者术前视力障碍23例(92%),视力正常2例(8%)。内镜入路9例(75%)肿瘤完全切除,镜下入路14例(56%)肿瘤完全切除。临床内镜下改善10例(83.3%),镜下改善16例(64%)。结论:经鼻内镜入路优于经蝶窦镜检入路。孟加拉国神经科学杂志2015;Vol. 31 (1): 21-29
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Risk Factors on the Size of Ruptured Intracranial Saccular Aneurysms Demographic and Clinical Pattern of Headache in Migraine Patients Infarct Pattern in Patients with Varying Degrees of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Prognostic significance of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Score in predicting 30-day mortality in Chittagong Medical College Hospital Clinical, Autonomic & Electrophysiological Features in Patients with Guillain Barre Syndrome in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1