Acquisition of compounds in Estonian and Russian: Frequency, productivity, transparency and simplicity effect

Q2 Arts and Humanities Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Uhingu Aastaraamat Pub Date : 2013-04-01 DOI:10.5128/ERYA9.02
Reili Argus, V. Kazakovskaya
{"title":"Acquisition of compounds in Estonian and Russian: Frequency, productivity, transparency and simplicity effect","authors":"Reili Argus, V. Kazakovskaya","doi":"10.5128/ERYA9.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the early phases of acquisition of noun compounds in two typologically different languages – Estonian and Russian. Longitudinal data on three Russian and two Estonian typically-developing monolingual children and their caregivers was analysed and compared in relation to first emergence, the development of different compound types, productivity, frequency, simplicity and transparency of compounds, and also to the impact of morphological wealth in the input on the output. Although the frequency of compounds is somewhat different in the two languages being observed, the first compounds emerge in the speech of Estonian and Russian children almost at the same age and quite early, at the end of the second year of life. In both Estonian and Russian, children first acquire productive pat- terns in both languages, Estonian and Russian, respectively. Factors such as simplicity and frequency are intertwined in the acquisition process. Simple structures occur at the same time as frequent ones but it cannot just be assumed that simplicity is a stronger factor influencing the choice of first noun compounds than frequency. Frequency effects are not straightforward: there are differences in the individual usage of compounds by the caregivers, and the frequency of compounds in child-directed speech does not always seem to be reflected in the speech of the children. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa9.02","PeriodicalId":35118,"journal":{"name":"Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Uhingu Aastaraamat","volume":"92 1","pages":"23-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Uhingu Aastaraamat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5128/ERYA9.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This article discusses the early phases of acquisition of noun compounds in two typologically different languages – Estonian and Russian. Longitudinal data on three Russian and two Estonian typically-developing monolingual children and their caregivers was analysed and compared in relation to first emergence, the development of different compound types, productivity, frequency, simplicity and transparency of compounds, and also to the impact of morphological wealth in the input on the output. Although the frequency of compounds is somewhat different in the two languages being observed, the first compounds emerge in the speech of Estonian and Russian children almost at the same age and quite early, at the end of the second year of life. In both Estonian and Russian, children first acquire productive pat- terns in both languages, Estonian and Russian, respectively. Factors such as simplicity and frequency are intertwined in the acquisition process. Simple structures occur at the same time as frequent ones but it cannot just be assumed that simplicity is a stronger factor influencing the choice of first noun compounds than frequency. Frequency effects are not straightforward: there are differences in the individual usage of compounds by the caregivers, and the frequency of compounds in child-directed speech does not always seem to be reflected in the speech of the children. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa9.02
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱沙尼亚语和俄语中化合物的获取:频率、效率、透明度和简化效果
本文讨论了两种类型不同的语言-爱沙尼亚语和俄语中名词复合词的早期习得阶段。对三名俄罗斯和两名爱沙尼亚典型发展单语儿童及其照顾者的纵向数据进行了分析和比较,涉及首次出现、不同复合类型的发展、生产力、频率、复合的简单性和透明度,以及投入的形态财富对产出的影响。虽然观察到的两种语言中复合词的使用频率有所不同,但爱沙尼亚和俄罗斯儿童几乎在同样的年龄和相当早的时候(即两岁快结束时)就出现了第一批复合词。在爱沙尼亚语和俄语中,儿童首先习得两种语言(分别是爱沙尼亚语和俄语)的生产模式。在获取过程中,简单性和频率等因素交织在一起。简单结构和频繁结构同时出现,但不能简单地认为简单性比频率更能影响第一名词复合词的选择。频率的影响并不是直截了当地说的:照顾者对复合词的个人使用是有差异的,在儿童导向的言语中使用复合词的频率似乎并不总是反映在儿童的言语中。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa9.02
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Uhingu Aastaraamat
Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Uhingu Aastaraamat Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
What is philology? Philology and its utilisation in the study of linguistic variation and change Mängustatud õppetegevuste mõju üheksanda klassi õpilaste suhtumisele eesti keele kui teise keele tundidesse Sõnaliik leksikograafi töölaual: sõnaliikide roll tänapäeva leksikograafias Keeleandmete õigusliku režiimi mõju nende abil loodud keelemudelitele MAIN-testi kasutamine eesti laste jutustamisoskuse hindamiseks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1