{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights: Corporate Responsibility in AI Governance Initiatives","authors":"Lottie Lane","doi":"10.1080/18918131.2022.2137288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Private businesses are central actors in the development of artificial intelligence (AI), meaning they have a key role in ensuring that AI respects human rights. Meanwhile, international human rights law (IHRL) has been scrambling to catch up with technological developments that have occurred since the establishment of its state-centric framework that were not envisaged by its drafters. Despite progress in the development of international legal standards on business and human rights, uncertainties regarding the role and responsibilities of AI businesses remain. This article addresses these uncertainties from a governance perspective and against the backdrop of the public/private divide; it views laws as instruments of governance, which comprises activities by many public and private actors. Section 2 briefly assesses the current framework of IHRL regarding AI and businesses, focusing on the lack of legal certainty. Section 3 critically analyses AI initiatives beyond IHRL that have been adopted at international, regional, and national levels to gain insight into specific standards of behaviour expected of AI businesses, as well as to challenge a dichotomous public/private divide in this context. Section 4 provides conclusions and recommendations.","PeriodicalId":42311,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Human Rights","volume":"1 1","pages":"304 - 325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2022.2137288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT Private businesses are central actors in the development of artificial intelligence (AI), meaning they have a key role in ensuring that AI respects human rights. Meanwhile, international human rights law (IHRL) has been scrambling to catch up with technological developments that have occurred since the establishment of its state-centric framework that were not envisaged by its drafters. Despite progress in the development of international legal standards on business and human rights, uncertainties regarding the role and responsibilities of AI businesses remain. This article addresses these uncertainties from a governance perspective and against the backdrop of the public/private divide; it views laws as instruments of governance, which comprises activities by many public and private actors. Section 2 briefly assesses the current framework of IHRL regarding AI and businesses, focusing on the lack of legal certainty. Section 3 critically analyses AI initiatives beyond IHRL that have been adopted at international, regional, and national levels to gain insight into specific standards of behaviour expected of AI businesses, as well as to challenge a dichotomous public/private divide in this context. Section 4 provides conclusions and recommendations.
期刊介绍:
The Nordic Journal of Human Rights is the Nordic countries’ leading forum for analyses, debate and information about human rights. The Journal’s aim is to provide a cutting-edge forum for international academic critique and analysis in the field of human rights. The Journal takes a broad view of human rights, and wishes to publish high quality and cross-disciplinary analyses and comments on the past, current and future status of human rights for profound collective reflection. It was first issued in 1982 and is published by the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights at the University of Oslo in collaboration with Nordic research centres for human rights.