W. Chan, Naomi Hau-Yin Cheng, Kw Cheng, K. Cheung, M. Cheung, K. Ho, Lok-Lam E. Huen, Janet F.Y. Lee, K. Leung
{"title":"Does appendix position affect the clinical outcome of acute appendicitis","authors":"W. Chan, Naomi Hau-Yin Cheng, Kw Cheng, K. Cheung, M. Cheung, K. Ho, Lok-Lam E. Huen, Janet F.Y. Lee, K. Leung","doi":"10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00145.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To elucidate if the course of acute appendicitis is influenced by the variable positions of the appendix. The appendix positions were divided into two groups: (i) the anterior group, which included the anterior, the pelvic and the paracaecal positions; and (ii) the posterior group, which included the retrocaecal and retroileal positions. \n \n \n \nMethod: The hospital records of 161 patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from January 2000 to June 2001 at Prince of Wales Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. \n \n \n \nResults: Clinicians’ delay in reaching the diagnosis was longer in the posterior group (9.9 h vs 5.8 h; P=0.043). However, complicated appendicitis (gangrenous changes, perforation or abscess formation) was not associated with the appendix location (P = 0.078). The median operating time for laparoscopic appendectomies lasted longer in the posterior group (77.5 min vs 60 min; P = 0.02). These patients also had a longer hospital stay (6 days vs 4 days; P = 0.049). No difference was observed among patients who underwent open surgery. \n \n \n \nConclusion: Appendices in the ‘hidden’ position did not translate into a higher incidence of complicated appendicitis or postoperative complications except for the slightly longer hospital stay in patients treated by laparoscopy. Therefore, we concluded that the location of appendices does not affect the clinical course of appendicitis in the locality studied.","PeriodicalId":7943,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong","volume":"21 1","pages":"109-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00145.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Objective: To elucidate if the course of acute appendicitis is influenced by the variable positions of the appendix. The appendix positions were divided into two groups: (i) the anterior group, which included the anterior, the pelvic and the paracaecal positions; and (ii) the posterior group, which included the retrocaecal and retroileal positions.
Method: The hospital records of 161 patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from January 2000 to June 2001 at Prince of Wales Hospital were reviewed retrospectively.
Results: Clinicians’ delay in reaching the diagnosis was longer in the posterior group (9.9 h vs 5.8 h; P=0.043). However, complicated appendicitis (gangrenous changes, perforation or abscess formation) was not associated with the appendix location (P = 0.078). The median operating time for laparoscopic appendectomies lasted longer in the posterior group (77.5 min vs 60 min; P = 0.02). These patients also had a longer hospital stay (6 days vs 4 days; P = 0.049). No difference was observed among patients who underwent open surgery.
Conclusion: Appendices in the ‘hidden’ position did not translate into a higher incidence of complicated appendicitis or postoperative complications except for the slightly longer hospital stay in patients treated by laparoscopy. Therefore, we concluded that the location of appendices does not affect the clinical course of appendicitis in the locality studied.
目的:探讨阑尾位置变化对急性阑尾炎病程的影响。阑尾位置分为两组:(i)前组,包括前、盆腔和尾旁位置;(ii)后组,包括盲肠后和回肠后位置。方法:对2000年1月至2001年6月在威尔斯亲王医院行急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术的161例患者的住院资料进行回顾性分析。结果:后路组临床医生延迟诊断的时间更长(9.9 h vs 5.8 h;P = 0.043)。而复杂性阑尾炎(坏疽、穿孔或脓肿形成)与阑尾位置无关(P = 0.078)。后路组腹腔镜阑尾切除术的中位手术时间更长(77.5 min vs 60 min;p = 0.02)。这些患者的住院时间也更长(6天vs 4天;p = 0.049)。在接受开放手术的患者中没有观察到差异。结论:阑尾处于“隐藏”位置并不意味着复杂阑尾炎或术后并发症的发生率更高,但腹腔镜手术患者的住院时间略长。因此,我们认为阑尾的位置不影响阑尾炎的临床病程。