Factors Predicting Peristaltic Abnormalities in Gastroesophageal Reflux

Piyush Bawane, Mayank Jain, M. Srinivas, T. Michael, J. Venkataraman
{"title":"Factors Predicting Peristaltic Abnormalities in Gastroesophageal Reflux","authors":"Piyush Bawane, Mayank Jain, M. Srinivas, T. Michael, J. Venkataraman","doi":"10.7869/TG.556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Data regarding the type of breaks and its impact on peristalsis in gastro esophageal reflux disease(GERD) is scanty. Aim : To study the prevalence and significance of segmental breaks in symptomatic GERD cases. To identify the endoscopy grading and dietary factors that are likely to affect esophageal motility. Materials and Methods : 106 patients with GERD were included. Baseline patient information included age, gender, BMI, diet recall and upper endoscopy report.Normal (Group I) and ineffective swallows (Group II, minor peristaltic defects) were compared for proximal and distal segment breaks . Impact of multiple rapid swallows was assessed in a subset of cases.Appropriate statistical tests were used. p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results : 72 patients had normal esophageal motility (Group I) and 30 had minor peristalitc abnormality (Group II). BMI was significantly higher in Group II. Mean basal LES pressure, IRP and DCI in Group II was significantly low and a significant proportion of swallows in patients in Group II had breaks greater than 5 cm in S1 and more than 2 cm in S2 and S3. The basal LES pressure and BMI cut off was 12.1 mm Hg and 26.1 kg per m2respectively. The odds ratio of having a minor peristaltic disorder was 3.2 times(1.4-4.1, p 0.001) with the combination of these two factors. Conclusion : Majority of GERD patients had normal motility. Even in those with minor peristaltic abnormality, the peristaltic reserve was good.Patients in group II had significantly lower basal LES pressures and higher BMI.","PeriodicalId":23281,"journal":{"name":"Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7869/TG.556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Data regarding the type of breaks and its impact on peristalsis in gastro esophageal reflux disease(GERD) is scanty. Aim : To study the prevalence and significance of segmental breaks in symptomatic GERD cases. To identify the endoscopy grading and dietary factors that are likely to affect esophageal motility. Materials and Methods : 106 patients with GERD were included. Baseline patient information included age, gender, BMI, diet recall and upper endoscopy report.Normal (Group I) and ineffective swallows (Group II, minor peristaltic defects) were compared for proximal and distal segment breaks . Impact of multiple rapid swallows was assessed in a subset of cases.Appropriate statistical tests were used. p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results : 72 patients had normal esophageal motility (Group I) and 30 had minor peristalitc abnormality (Group II). BMI was significantly higher in Group II. Mean basal LES pressure, IRP and DCI in Group II was significantly low and a significant proportion of swallows in patients in Group II had breaks greater than 5 cm in S1 and more than 2 cm in S2 and S3. The basal LES pressure and BMI cut off was 12.1 mm Hg and 26.1 kg per m2respectively. The odds ratio of having a minor peristaltic disorder was 3.2 times(1.4-4.1, p 0.001) with the combination of these two factors. Conclusion : Majority of GERD patients had normal motility. Even in those with minor peristaltic abnormality, the peristaltic reserve was good.Patients in group II had significantly lower basal LES pressures and higher BMI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃食管反流中预测蠕动异常的因素
背景:关于胃食管反流病(GERD)的断裂类型及其对蠕动的影响的资料很少。目的:探讨有症状的反流胃食管反流中节段断裂的发生率及意义。确定可能影响食管运动的内镜分级和饮食因素。材料与方法:纳入106例胃食管反流患者。基线患者信息包括年龄、性别、BMI、饮食回忆和上颌内窥镜检查报告。比较正常燕子(组I)和无效燕子(组II,轻微蠕动缺陷)近端和远端节段断裂情况。在部分病例中评估了多次快速吞咽的影响。采用了适当的统计检验。P值<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:食管运动正常72例(I组),轻度蠕动异常30例(II组),II组BMI明显增高。II组患者的平均基础LES压、IRP和DCI均明显较低,且II组患者中有显著比例的吞口S1大于5cm, S2和S3大于2cm。基础LES压和BMI分别为12.1 mm Hg和26.1 kg / m2。合并这两个因素时,患有轻微蠕动障碍的比值比为3.2倍(1.4-4.1,p 0.001)。结论:大多数胃食管反流患者运动功能正常。即使有轻微的蠕动异常,蠕动储备也很好。II组患者基底LES压明显降低,BMI明显升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team (Jnet) Classification System for the Differential Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Redo Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Case of Heterotaxy Polysplenia Syndrome with Sealed GB Perforation Radiological Approach to Diagnosis of Peribiliary Lesions Post-ERCP Hepatic Hematoma: Case Report and Review of Literature A Comparative Study on Outcome of Amoebic Liver Abscess in Patients With and Without Alcoholic Liver Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1