Influence of storage time on activation of platelets collected with CS 3000 Plus and Cobe Spectra using platelet storage containers.

S. Kutlay, O. Ilhan, O. Arslan, M. Beksaç
{"title":"Influence of storage time on activation of platelets collected with CS 3000 Plus and Cobe Spectra using platelet storage containers.","authors":"S. Kutlay, O. Ilhan, O. Arslan, M. Beksaç","doi":"10.1046/J.1526-0968.2002.00319.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activation in platelet suspensions collected with CS 3000 Plus and Cobe Spectra cell separators using platelet storage containers and the role of white blood cell (WBC) concentration of the suspension in this activation. Seventy-seven donors were subjected to automated platelet donations with 1 type of equipment (37 with Cobe Spectra and 40 with CS 3000 Plus). Blood samples were obtained immediately after separation and on the third day of storage at 22 degrees C in constant agitation. The WBC concentrations of these samples were studied before storage. Paraformaldehyde-fixed platelets were incubated with 2 murine monoclonal antibodies: CD42b and CD62. Murine monoclonal antibody immunoglobulin G was used as a negative isotypic control. Bound antibody was then quantitated by flow cytometry. On the third day of storage, a significant increase in CD62 expression rate was observed in platelet suspensions collected with both kinds of equipment. Mean expression rates for Cobe Spectra on Day 0 and Day 3 were 25.6 +/- 6.2% and 69.2 +/- 9.7%, respectively. Mean expression rates for CS 3000 Plus on Day 0 and Day 3 were 23.4 +/- 8.2% and 67.0 +/- 8.2%, respectively. The mean results for both devices were 22.8 +/- 4.56% for Day 0 and 68.7 +/- 13.2% for Day 3. There was no difference between CD42b mean fluorescence intensity on Days 0 and 3 for the 2 devices (p > 0.5). Mean WBC concentrations in the platelet suspensions for Cobe Spectra and CS 3000 Plus were 0.37 x 10(3)/microl and 0.42 x 10(3)/microl, respectively, and there was no relation between WBC concentration and increase in CD62 expression. Both kinds of equipment were found to be similar according to in vitro activation markers.","PeriodicalId":79755,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis : official journal of the International Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Apheresis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis : official journal of the International Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1526-0968.2002.00319.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activation in platelet suspensions collected with CS 3000 Plus and Cobe Spectra cell separators using platelet storage containers and the role of white blood cell (WBC) concentration of the suspension in this activation. Seventy-seven donors were subjected to automated platelet donations with 1 type of equipment (37 with Cobe Spectra and 40 with CS 3000 Plus). Blood samples were obtained immediately after separation and on the third day of storage at 22 degrees C in constant agitation. The WBC concentrations of these samples were studied before storage. Paraformaldehyde-fixed platelets were incubated with 2 murine monoclonal antibodies: CD42b and CD62. Murine monoclonal antibody immunoglobulin G was used as a negative isotypic control. Bound antibody was then quantitated by flow cytometry. On the third day of storage, a significant increase in CD62 expression rate was observed in platelet suspensions collected with both kinds of equipment. Mean expression rates for Cobe Spectra on Day 0 and Day 3 were 25.6 +/- 6.2% and 69.2 +/- 9.7%, respectively. Mean expression rates for CS 3000 Plus on Day 0 and Day 3 were 23.4 +/- 8.2% and 67.0 +/- 8.2%, respectively. The mean results for both devices were 22.8 +/- 4.56% for Day 0 and 68.7 +/- 13.2% for Day 3. There was no difference between CD42b mean fluorescence intensity on Days 0 and 3 for the 2 devices (p > 0.5). Mean WBC concentrations in the platelet suspensions for Cobe Spectra and CS 3000 Plus were 0.37 x 10(3)/microl and 0.42 x 10(3)/microl, respectively, and there was no relation between WBC concentration and increase in CD62 expression. Both kinds of equipment were found to be similar according to in vitro activation markers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
储存时间对血小板储存容器中CS 3000 Plus和Cobe Spectra采集的血小板活化的影响。
本研究的目的是评估CS 3000 Plus和Cobe Spectra细胞分离器收集的血小板悬液在体外活化血小板的作用,以及悬液中白细胞(WBC)浓度在这种活化中的作用。77名献血者使用1种设备进行自动血小板捐献(37人使用Cobe Spectra, 40人使用CS 3000 Plus)。分离后立即采集血样,并在22℃下持续搅拌保存第三天。在储存前对这些样品的白细胞浓度进行了研究。多聚甲醛固定血小板用2种小鼠单克隆抗体CD42b和CD62孵育。小鼠单克隆抗体免疫球蛋白G作为阴性同型对照。用流式细胞术定量结合抗体。储存第3天,两种设备采集的血小板悬液中CD62表达率均显著升高。Cobe Spectra在第0天和第3天的平均表达率分别为25.6 +/- 6.2%和69.2 +/- 9.7%。CS 3000 +在第0天和第3天的平均表达率分别为23.4 +/- 8.2%和67.0 +/- 8.2%。两种设备的平均结果在第0天为22.8 +/- 4.56%,在第3天为68.7 +/- 13.2%。两种设备在第0天和第3天CD42b平均荧光强度无差异(p > 0.5)。Cobe Spectra和CS 3000 Plus的血小板悬浮液中白细胞的平均浓度分别为0.37 × 10(3)/微升和0.42 × 10(3)/微升,白细胞浓度与CD62表达增加之间没有关系。根据体外激活标记,发现两种设备相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Presidential Address: PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Fluctuations in the peripheral blood leukocyte and platelet counts in leukocytapheresis in healthy volunteers. Mobilization factors of peripheral blood stem cells in healthy donors. Cytokine removal by plasma exchange with continuous hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients. In vitro evaluation of newly developed adsorbent for selective removal of glycosylated low-density lipoprotein.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1