Normative Values for Femoral Length, Tibial Length, and the Femorotibial Ratio in Adults Using Standing Full-Length Radiography

Q4 Medicine Clinical Osteology Pub Date : 2021-05-13 DOI:10.3390/OSTEOLOGY1020009
S. Aitken
{"title":"Normative Values for Femoral Length, Tibial Length, and the Femorotibial Ratio in Adults Using Standing Full-Length Radiography","authors":"S. Aitken","doi":"10.3390/OSTEOLOGY1020009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge of the normal length and skeletal proportions of the lower limb is required as part of the evaluation of limb length discrepancy. When measuring limb length, modern standing full-length digital radiographs confer a level of clinical accuracy interchangeable with that of CT imaging. This study reports a set of normative values for lower limb length using the standing full-length radiographs of 753 patients (61% male). Lower limb length, femoral length, tibial length, and the femorotibial ratio were measured in 1077 limbs. The reliability of the measurement method was tested using the intra-class correlation (ICC) of agreement between three observers. The mean length of 1077 lower limbs was 89.0 cm (range 70.2 to 103.9 cm). Mean femoral length was 50.0 cm (39.3 to 58.4 cm) and tibial length was 39.0 cm (30.8 to 46.5 cm). The median side-to-side difference was 0.4 cm (0.2 to 0.7, max 1.8 cm) between 324 paired limbs. The mean ratio of femoral length to tibial length for the study population was 1.28:1 (range 1.16 to 1.39). A moderately strong inverse linear relationship (r = −0.35, p < 0.001, Pearson’s) was identified between tibial length and the corresponding femorotibial ratio. The PACS-based length measurement method used in this study displayed excellent inter-observer reliability (ICC of 0.99). This study presents a normal range of values for lower limb length in adults and is the first to identify a linear relationship between tibial length and the femorotibial ratio.","PeriodicalId":36674,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Osteology","volume":"11 1","pages":"86-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Osteology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/OSTEOLOGY1020009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Knowledge of the normal length and skeletal proportions of the lower limb is required as part of the evaluation of limb length discrepancy. When measuring limb length, modern standing full-length digital radiographs confer a level of clinical accuracy interchangeable with that of CT imaging. This study reports a set of normative values for lower limb length using the standing full-length radiographs of 753 patients (61% male). Lower limb length, femoral length, tibial length, and the femorotibial ratio were measured in 1077 limbs. The reliability of the measurement method was tested using the intra-class correlation (ICC) of agreement between three observers. The mean length of 1077 lower limbs was 89.0 cm (range 70.2 to 103.9 cm). Mean femoral length was 50.0 cm (39.3 to 58.4 cm) and tibial length was 39.0 cm (30.8 to 46.5 cm). The median side-to-side difference was 0.4 cm (0.2 to 0.7, max 1.8 cm) between 324 paired limbs. The mean ratio of femoral length to tibial length for the study population was 1.28:1 (range 1.16 to 1.39). A moderately strong inverse linear relationship (r = −0.35, p < 0.001, Pearson’s) was identified between tibial length and the corresponding femorotibial ratio. The PACS-based length measurement method used in this study displayed excellent inter-observer reliability (ICC of 0.99). This study presents a normal range of values for lower limb length in adults and is the first to identify a linear relationship between tibial length and the femorotibial ratio.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
站立式全身x线摄影测定成人股骨长度、胫骨长度和股胫比的标准值
作为评估肢体长度差异的一部分,需要了解下肢的正常长度和骨骼比例。当测量肢体长度时,现代站立式全长数字x线片具有与CT成像可互换的临床精度水平。本研究报告了753例患者(61%为男性)站立全身x线片下肢长度的一组规范值。测量1077例下肢长、股骨长、胫骨长及股胫比。测量方法的可靠性是用三个观察者之间的一致性的类内相关(ICC)来检验的。1077例下肢平均长度为89.0 cm (70.2 ~ 103.9 cm)。股骨平均长度为50.0 cm (39.3 ~ 58.4 cm),胫骨平均长度为39.0 cm (30.8 ~ 46.5 cm)。324对四肢的中位侧差为0.4 cm(0.2 ~ 0.7,最大1.8 cm)。研究人群股骨长度与胫骨长度的平均比值为1.28:1(范围1.16至1.39)。胫骨长度与相应的股胫比之间存在中等强的逆线性关系(r = - 0.35, p < 0.001, Pearson’s)。本研究使用的基于pacs的长度测量方法显示出良好的观察者间信度(ICC为0.99)。这项研究提出了成人下肢长度的正常范围,并首次确定了胫骨长度与股胫比之间的线性关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Osteology
Clinical Osteology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Single-Lateral-Incision Technique for Talar Neck Fractures—A Viable Option Diagnosis and Management Controversies Illustrated by an Uncommon Case of Postpartum Pubic Symphysis Diastasis Bone Health, Intersectionality and Climate Change The Impact of Preoperative Education on Knee and Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review The Impact of Psychological Factors on Return to Sports after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1