Characterizing Technology's Influence on Distractive Behavior at Signalized Intersections

Q3 Engineering Transactions on Transport Sciences Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI:10.5507/tots.2022.015
Jobaidul Alam Boni, Kate Kyung Hyun, S. Mattingly
{"title":"Characterizing Technology's Influence on Distractive Behavior at Signalized Intersections","authors":"Jobaidul Alam Boni, Kate Kyung Hyun, S. Mattingly","doi":"10.5507/tots.2022.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Distracted driving existed since the invention of the automo- bile; however, the emergence of the cell phone and electronic devices created another source of distraction that affected drivers visually, physically, cognitively, and audibly. Many studies investigated factors that influenced saturation flow and startup lost time at a signalized intersection, but the impact of new distractions, such as electronic devices and in-vehicle entertainment systems, remained less investigated. This study aimed to char- acterize technology’s influence on driver behavior at intersections and the impact of distractions on startup lost time through a field test conducted at three intersections in Texas. This study used observational analysis and hypothesis testing to understand distraction behaviors and their impacts on individual and aggregated startup lost time. On average, 15% of drivers experienced distraction during a red indication, and a cell phone distracted more than 60% of these drivers. However, in vehicles located behind a heavy vehicle at an intersection, 20% of drivers were distracted, and 80% used a cell phone. Statistical analysis showed that distraction caused signifi- cantly higher headways and total lost times than non-distraction conditions. More importantly, technology-induced distraction, which created significant intersection delay, was more uncertain and varied from event to event more than non-technology-induced delay. This study showed that technology-induced distractions from the prevalent use of cell phones created an impact on startup lost time and saturation flow, which remained critical to properly determine the phase and cycle lengths.","PeriodicalId":52273,"journal":{"name":"Transactions on Transport Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions on Transport Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/tots.2022.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Distracted driving existed since the invention of the automo- bile; however, the emergence of the cell phone and electronic devices created another source of distraction that affected drivers visually, physically, cognitively, and audibly. Many studies investigated factors that influenced saturation flow and startup lost time at a signalized intersection, but the impact of new distractions, such as electronic devices and in-vehicle entertainment systems, remained less investigated. This study aimed to char- acterize technology’s influence on driver behavior at intersections and the impact of distractions on startup lost time through a field test conducted at three intersections in Texas. This study used observational analysis and hypothesis testing to understand distraction behaviors and their impacts on individual and aggregated startup lost time. On average, 15% of drivers experienced distraction during a red indication, and a cell phone distracted more than 60% of these drivers. However, in vehicles located behind a heavy vehicle at an intersection, 20% of drivers were distracted, and 80% used a cell phone. Statistical analysis showed that distraction caused signifi- cantly higher headways and total lost times than non-distraction conditions. More importantly, technology-induced distraction, which created significant intersection delay, was more uncertain and varied from event to event more than non-technology-induced delay. This study showed that technology-induced distractions from the prevalent use of cell phones created an impact on startup lost time and saturation flow, which remained critical to properly determine the phase and cycle lengths.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表征技术对信号交叉口分心行为的影响
分心驾驶自汽车发明以来就存在;然而,手机和电子设备的出现造成了另一种分心的来源,影响了司机的视觉、身体、认知和听觉。许多研究调查了信号交叉口影响饱和流量和启动时间的因素,但对电子设备和车载娱乐系统等新干扰因素的影响研究较少。本研究旨在通过在德克萨斯州的三个十字路口进行的实地测试来表征技术对驾驶员在十字路口行为的影响以及分心对启动时间的影响。本研究采用观察分析和假设检验来了解分心行为及其对个人和总体启动时间损失的影响。平均而言,15%的司机在红灯期间会分心,其中超过60%的司机会被手机分心。然而,在十字路口的重型车辆后面的车辆中,20%的司机分心,80%的司机使用手机。统计分析表明,与非分心的情况相比,分心造成的进步和总损失时间明显更高。更重要的是,与非技术诱导延迟相比,技术诱导分心造成的交叉口延迟具有更大的不确定性和不同事件的差异。这项研究表明,由于手机的普遍使用,技术导致的分心对启动损失时间和饱和流量产生了影响,这对于正确确定阶段和周期长度至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions on Transport Sciences
Transactions on Transport Sciences Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Shared Space Feasibility Based on Traffic-Engineering Data Exploring Lane Changing Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review of Modeling Approaches, Traffic Impacts, and Future Directions in Traffic Engineering Research Between Investment Risk and Economic Benefit: Potential Analysis for the Reactivation of the Hershey Railway in Cuba Consumer Preferences and Determinants of Transportation Mode Choice Behaviors in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles A Comprehensive Evaluation and Mitigation Approaches for Traffic-Related Noise in the Sungai Long Region, Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1