The Possibilities and Obstacles to Creating an Iclusive Register of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina – An Anthropological Analysis

J. Ćuković, M. Milenković
{"title":"The Possibilities and Obstacles to Creating an Iclusive Register of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina – An Anthropological Analysis","authors":"J. Ćuković, M. Milenković","doi":"10.21301/eap.v15i1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper looks at the current situation of the institutional practice of safeguarding the intangible cultural heritage (ICH) in terms of the idea, put forward in anthropological literature, about the need to establish an inclusive ICH register for the entire territory of the Republic of Serbia, and a separate one for the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina. In view of the principles of the Unesco Convention for the Safeguarding of the ICH and the accompanying Operational Directives for its implementation, the ethnic attribution of heritage, proposed as a solution to the problem of underrepresentation of minority heritage in the state register, is analytically shown to be possible, yet insufficient. Although neither Unesco methodology nor global cultural policies present an obstacle to the creation of parallel registers, the existing Safeguarding Network, as well as the problem of underrepresentation of minority identities, would not be resolved in a way that would not at present demand excessive theoretical and moral concessions from anthropology, and particularly from applied ethnology. An analysis of the disharmonies between the theoretical apparatus of anthropology, the practice of applying ethnology within the safeguarding system, the legal framework for the protetion of ethnic minorities, and the results of qualitative research among minority communities, suggests the need for further mutual adjustment between science, the administration and the non-governmental sector through intersectoral collaboration.","PeriodicalId":43531,"journal":{"name":"Etnoantropoloski Problemi-Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etnoantropoloski Problemi-Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v15i1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper looks at the current situation of the institutional practice of safeguarding the intangible cultural heritage (ICH) in terms of the idea, put forward in anthropological literature, about the need to establish an inclusive ICH register for the entire territory of the Republic of Serbia, and a separate one for the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina. In view of the principles of the Unesco Convention for the Safeguarding of the ICH and the accompanying Operational Directives for its implementation, the ethnic attribution of heritage, proposed as a solution to the problem of underrepresentation of minority heritage in the state register, is analytically shown to be possible, yet insufficient. Although neither Unesco methodology nor global cultural policies present an obstacle to the creation of parallel registers, the existing Safeguarding Network, as well as the problem of underrepresentation of minority identities, would not be resolved in a way that would not at present demand excessive theoretical and moral concessions from anthropology, and particularly from applied ethnology. An analysis of the disharmonies between the theoretical apparatus of anthropology, the practice of applying ethnology within the safeguarding system, the legal framework for the protetion of ethnic minorities, and the results of qualitative research among minority communities, suggests the need for further mutual adjustment between science, the administration and the non-governmental sector through intersectoral collaboration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创建伏伊伏丁那自治省非物质文化遗产包容性名录的可能性与障碍——一项人类学分析
本文从人类学文献中提出的需要在塞尔维亚共和国全境建立一个包容性的非物质文化遗产名录,并在伏伊伏丁那自治省建立一个单独的非物质文化遗产名录的观点出发,考察了保护非物质文化遗产(ICH)的制度实践现状。鉴于联合国教科文组织《保护非物质文化遗产公约》的原则及其附带的实施行动指示,作为解决国家登记册中少数民族遗产代表性不足问题的一种方法,遗产的民族归属分析表明是可能的,但还不够。虽然教科文组织的方法和全球文化政策都没有对建立平行登记构成障碍,但现有的保护网络,以及少数民族身份代表性不足的问题,目前不会以一种不要求人类学,特别是应用民族学在理论和道德上做出过度让步的方式来解决。对人类学的理论工具、在保护制度内应用民族学的实践、保护少数民族的法律框架和少数民族社区的定性研究结果之间的不协调进行的分析表明,需要通过部门间合作在科学、行政和非政府部门之间进一步相互调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Metamodernism and Language: Pandemic Era Advertising "Heritage-for-Peace and Development": An Opportunity Not to be Missed The Survivor's Suite: The Life of the International Festival of Ethnological Film in Belgrade through Interesting Times Traditional Sports and Games as an Element of Intangible Cultural Heritage From the Physical Body to Dynamic Embodiment: Towards an Anthropological Study of Martial Arts Body Movement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1