The Supplemental Expenditure Poverty Measure: A New Method for Measuring Poverty

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/eca.2022.0017
John M. Fitzgerald, R. Moffitt
{"title":"The Supplemental Expenditure Poverty Measure: A New Method for Measuring Poverty","authors":"John M. Fitzgerald, R. Moffitt","doi":"10.1353/eca.2022.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:We propose a new measure of the rate of poverty we call the supplemental expenditure poverty measure (SEPM), based on expenditure in the Consumer Expenditure Survey. It treats household expenditure as a measure of resources available to purchase the minimum bundle necessary to meet basic needs. Our measure differs from conventional income and consumption poverty in both concept and measurement, and it has advantages relative to both. Poverty rates using our basic measure are very close in level and recent trend to those of the most preferred income-based poverty rate produced by the US Census Bureau. But the SEPM poverty rate differs from the US Census Bureau measure at different levels of the poverty line. For example, the number of individuals living in either poor or almost poor households is 5 percentage points greater (about 16 million individuals) using our measure. We also construct an augmented measure that adds additional potential liquid resources. This \"maximal resources\" measure indicates that if disadvantaged households used up all their bank balances and maximized their credit card borrowing, 9.6 percent of the population (over 31 million individuals) would still be poor and unable to purchase the goods necessary for the basic needs of life.","PeriodicalId":51405,"journal":{"name":"Brookings Papers on Economic Activity","volume":"26 1","pages":"253 - 305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brookings Papers on Economic Activity","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2022.0017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT:We propose a new measure of the rate of poverty we call the supplemental expenditure poverty measure (SEPM), based on expenditure in the Consumer Expenditure Survey. It treats household expenditure as a measure of resources available to purchase the minimum bundle necessary to meet basic needs. Our measure differs from conventional income and consumption poverty in both concept and measurement, and it has advantages relative to both. Poverty rates using our basic measure are very close in level and recent trend to those of the most preferred income-based poverty rate produced by the US Census Bureau. But the SEPM poverty rate differs from the US Census Bureau measure at different levels of the poverty line. For example, the number of individuals living in either poor or almost poor households is 5 percentage points greater (about 16 million individuals) using our measure. We also construct an augmented measure that adds additional potential liquid resources. This "maximal resources" measure indicates that if disadvantaged households used up all their bank balances and maximized their credit card borrowing, 9.6 percent of the population (over 31 million individuals) would still be poor and unable to purchase the goods necessary for the basic needs of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充支出贫困测度:一种衡量贫困的新方法
摘要:本文基于消费者支出调查中的支出,提出了一种新的贫困率度量方法——补充支出贫困度量(SEPM)。它将家庭支出视为衡量可用于购买满足基本需要的最低限度必需品的资源。本文的计量方法在概念和计量方法上都与传统的收入贫困和消费性贫困有所不同,并具有相对于两者的优势。根据我们的基本衡量标准,贫困率在水平和近期趋势上与美国人口普查局(US Census Bureau)最优选的基于收入的贫困率非常接近。但SEPM的贫困率与美国人口普查局在不同贫困线水平上的测量结果不同。例如,使用我们的衡量标准,生活在贫困或近乎贫困家庭中的个人数量高出5个百分点(约1600万人)。我们还构建了一个增强措施,增加了额外的潜在液体资源。这一“最大资源”指标表明,如果弱势家庭用尽了他们所有的银行余额,并将信用卡借款最大化,9.6%的人口(超过3100万人)仍将处于贫困状态,无法购买基本生活所需的物品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (BPEA) is a semi-annual academic conference and journal that pairs rigorous research with real-time policy analysis to address the most urgent economic challenges of the day. Working drafts of the papers are presented and discussed at conferences typically held twice each year, and the final versions of the papers and comments along with summaries of the general discussions are published in the journal several months later. The views expressed by the authors, discussants and conference participants in BPEA are strictly those of the authors, discussants and conference participants, and not of the Brookings Institution. As an independent think tank, the Brookings Institution does not take institutional positions on any issue.
期刊最新文献
Why Do We Dislike Inflation? Changing Central Bank Pressures and Inflation Sustained Debt Reduction: The Jamaica Exception The Emergence of a Uniform Business Cycle in the United States: Evidence from New Claims-Based Unemployment Data The Evolution of Banking in the 21st Century: Evidence and Regulatory Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1