Cross-Domain Access Control Encryption: Arbitrary-policy, Constant-size, Efficient

Xiuhua Wang, Sherman S. M. Chow
{"title":"Cross-Domain Access Control Encryption: Arbitrary-policy, Constant-size, Efficient","authors":"Xiuhua Wang, Sherman S. M. Chow","doi":"10.1109/SP40001.2021.00023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access control is a fundamental keystone in security. Damgard, Haagh, and Orlandi (TCC 2016) introduced access˚ control encryption (ACE) that enforces no-read and no-write rules without revealing the senders, receivers, or the content of the encrypted traffic. Existing designs of ACE for arbitrary policy (covering all possibilities of read/write relationship) rely on indistinguishability obfuscation or lattice-based assumptions, with either exponential-size ciphertexts or circuit realization of policy. Also, their designs mandate a private sanitizer key to remain perpetually online for sanitization. The only existing scheme that can afford a public sanitizer key supports only simple policies. To summarize, state-of-the-art ACE schemes only feature at most two of the following desirable properties: arbitrarypolicy, constant-size (ciphertext), and efficient (sanitization). This paper introduces an ACE scheme for arbitrary policy without sanitizer key, which solves the open question posed by Kim and Wu (Asiacrypt 2017). We also put forth the notion of cross-domain ACE, separating the key generator into the sender-authority and receiver-authority. Our scheme requires structure-preserving signatures, non-interactive zero-knowledge proof, and sanitizable identity-based broadcast encryption as the building blocks. It can be instantiated directly from pairing-based assumptions and features constant ciphertext size. We also prototyped our scheme and demonstrated its practical efficiency.","PeriodicalId":6786,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","volume":"27 1","pages":"748-761"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40001.2021.00023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Access control is a fundamental keystone in security. Damgard, Haagh, and Orlandi (TCC 2016) introduced access˚ control encryption (ACE) that enforces no-read and no-write rules without revealing the senders, receivers, or the content of the encrypted traffic. Existing designs of ACE for arbitrary policy (covering all possibilities of read/write relationship) rely on indistinguishability obfuscation or lattice-based assumptions, with either exponential-size ciphertexts or circuit realization of policy. Also, their designs mandate a private sanitizer key to remain perpetually online for sanitization. The only existing scheme that can afford a public sanitizer key supports only simple policies. To summarize, state-of-the-art ACE schemes only feature at most two of the following desirable properties: arbitrarypolicy, constant-size (ciphertext), and efficient (sanitization). This paper introduces an ACE scheme for arbitrary policy without sanitizer key, which solves the open question posed by Kim and Wu (Asiacrypt 2017). We also put forth the notion of cross-domain ACE, separating the key generator into the sender-authority and receiver-authority. Our scheme requires structure-preserving signatures, non-interactive zero-knowledge proof, and sanitizable identity-based broadcast encryption as the building blocks. It can be instantiated directly from pairing-based assumptions and features constant ciphertext size. We also prototyped our scheme and demonstrated its practical efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨域访问控制加密:任意策略,固定大小,高效
访问控制是安全的基石。Damgard, Haagh, and Orlandi (TCC 2016)引入了访问控制加密(ACE),该加密在不泄露发送方,接收方或加密流量内容的情况下强制执行无读和无写规则。针对任意策略(涵盖所有读/写关系的可能性)的现有ACE设计依赖于不可区分混淆或基于格的假设,使用指数大小的密文或策略的电路实现。此外,他们的设计要求一个私人消毒密钥,以保持永久在线进行消毒。唯一能够提供公共杀毒程序密钥的现有方案只支持简单的策略。总而言之,最先进的ACE方案最多只具有以下两个理想的特性:任意策略、恒定大小(密文)和高效(消毒)。本文介绍了一种不带消毒密钥的任意策略的ACE方案,解决了Kim和Wu (Asiacrypt 2017)提出的开放性问题。我们还提出了跨域ACE的概念,将密钥生成器分为发送方-授权方和接收方-授权方。我们的方案需要结构保持签名、非交互式零知识证明和基于身份的广播加密作为构建块。它可以直接从基于配对的假设中实例化,并且具有恒定的密文大小。我们还对我们的方案进行了原型设计,并证明了它的实际效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A2L: Anonymous Atomic Locks for Scalability in Payment Channel Hubs High-Assurance Cryptography in the Spectre Era An I/O Separation Model for Formal Verification of Kernel Implementations Trust, But Verify: A Longitudinal Analysis Of Android OEM Compliance and Customization HackEd: A Pedagogical Analysis of Online Vulnerability Discovery Exercises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1