Interposer test: Testing PCBs that have shrunk 100x

T. M. Mak
{"title":"Interposer test: Testing PCBs that have shrunk 100x","authors":"T. M. Mak","doi":"10.1109/TEST.2014.7035334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Silicon Interposer is the new PCB where silicon of different process technologies (like logic, DRAM, analog, etc.) can be bonded onto and integrated into the same package. Silicon interposer has microbumps on one side and flipchip (C4) bumps on the other, and signal on one side are connected to the other with TSV (Through Silicon Vias). Die to die interconnects are just wires from one microbump to another without connecting to any C4 on the bottom side. Essentially, these are tiny PCBs that have their dimensions shrink by 100x. Conceptually PCB essentially are just interconnects so testing really are just open/short and maybe leakage, i.e., ONLY if you can connect (or probe) to the microbumps. However, at 40–50um pitch, they are almost half the pitch of the most advanced flipchip bump technology with tens of thousands of microbumps in a typical application. The tight pitch and mass quantity of microbumps would drive for new probe technologies (read, more expensive) and complex test optimization at the ATE side. There is also no transistors (nor diodes) on this new PCB, so all you learnt about DFT is out the window. At the same time, it is expected to have zero test cost (as yield should be high). Some in the industry have suggested “Pretty Good Interposer”, only testing for systematics and not defects. Is, “pretty good”, good enough to stand in for “known good”? It all depends on what you put on these interposers and potentially yield loss can kill a product's viability. This talk will try to elaborate the challenges and will try to propose new test methods for testing these new, miniature PCB.","PeriodicalId":6403,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE International Test Conference","volume":"5 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE International Test Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEST.2014.7035334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Silicon Interposer is the new PCB where silicon of different process technologies (like logic, DRAM, analog, etc.) can be bonded onto and integrated into the same package. Silicon interposer has microbumps on one side and flipchip (C4) bumps on the other, and signal on one side are connected to the other with TSV (Through Silicon Vias). Die to die interconnects are just wires from one microbump to another without connecting to any C4 on the bottom side. Essentially, these are tiny PCBs that have their dimensions shrink by 100x. Conceptually PCB essentially are just interconnects so testing really are just open/short and maybe leakage, i.e., ONLY if you can connect (or probe) to the microbumps. However, at 40–50um pitch, they are almost half the pitch of the most advanced flipchip bump technology with tens of thousands of microbumps in a typical application. The tight pitch and mass quantity of microbumps would drive for new probe technologies (read, more expensive) and complex test optimization at the ATE side. There is also no transistors (nor diodes) on this new PCB, so all you learnt about DFT is out the window. At the same time, it is expected to have zero test cost (as yield should be high). Some in the industry have suggested “Pretty Good Interposer”, only testing for systematics and not defects. Is, “pretty good”, good enough to stand in for “known good”? It all depends on what you put on these interposers and potentially yield loss can kill a product's viability. This talk will try to elaborate the challenges and will try to propose new test methods for testing these new, miniature PCB.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介入物测试:测试缩水100倍的pcb
硅中间层是一种新型PCB,不同工艺技术的硅(如逻辑、DRAM、模拟等)可以粘合在一起并集成到同一个封装中。硅中间层一侧有微凸起,另一侧有倒装芯片(C4)凸起,一侧的信号通过TSV (Through Silicon Vias)连接到另一侧。Die to Die互连只是从一个微凸起到另一个微凸起的电线,没有连接到底部的任何C4。本质上,这些是尺寸缩小了100倍的微型pcb。从概念上讲,PCB本质上只是互连,因此测试实际上只是开/短和可能泄漏,也就是说,只有当您可以连接(或探头)到微凸起时。然而,在40-50um的间距下,它们几乎是最先进的倒装芯片碰撞技术的一半,在典型应用中有数万个微碰撞。紧凑的间距和大量的微凸点将推动新的探针技术(读取,更昂贵)和ATE方面复杂的测试优化。在这个新的PCB上也没有晶体管(也没有二极管),所以你学到的关于DFT的所有知识都被抛在了窗外。同时,预计测试成本为零(因为成品率应该很高)。一些业内人士建议使用“相当好的中介器”,只测试系统而不测试缺陷。“相当好”足以代替“已知好”吗?这完全取决于你在这些中间体上放了什么,潜在的产量损失可能会扼杀产品的生存能力。本次演讲将尝试阐述这些挑战,并尝试提出测试这些新型微型PCB的新测试方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Csirmaz's Duality Conjecture and Threshold Secret Sharing Online Mergers and Applications to Registration-Based Encryption and Accumulators Exponential Correlated Randomness Is Necessary in Communication-Optimal Perfectly Secure Two-Party Computation The Cost of Statistical Security in Proofs for Repeated Squaring Tight Estimate of the Local Leakage Resilience of the Additive Secret-Sharing Scheme & Its Consequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1