Child Care Subsidies and Child Skill Accumulation in One- and Two-Parent Families

Emily Moschini
{"title":"Child Care Subsidies and Child Skill Accumulation in One- and Two-Parent Families","authors":"Emily Moschini","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3890482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I examine the role of family structure and childcare subsidies in child skill accumulation. I establish empirically that skill accumulation is more responsive to childcare price for one-parent families than for two-parent families. I analyze the effects of childcare subsidies in a model featuring endogenous family formation, parental altruism, and a baseline subsidy resembling that of the United States. I find that eliminating this subsidy generates welfare losses of 1.63 percent of lifetime consumption, that equilibrium adjustments act to mitigate these losses, and that increasing uptake among one-parent families yields the highest welfare gains per additional recipient. (JEL I21, I26, J12, J13, J24)","PeriodicalId":18085,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Employment","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Employment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3890482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

I examine the role of family structure and childcare subsidies in child skill accumulation. I establish empirically that skill accumulation is more responsive to childcare price for one-parent families than for two-parent families. I analyze the effects of childcare subsidies in a model featuring endogenous family formation, parental altruism, and a baseline subsidy resembling that of the United States. I find that eliminating this subsidy generates welfare losses of 1.63 percent of lifetime consumption, that equilibrium adjustments act to mitigate these losses, and that increasing uptake among one-parent families yields the highest welfare gains per additional recipient. (JEL I21, I26, J12, J13, J24)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单亲和双亲家庭的托儿补贴与儿童技能积累
我研究了家庭结构和儿童保育补贴在儿童技能积累中的作用。我的经验证明,与双亲家庭相比,单亲家庭的技能积累对育儿价格的响应更大。我在一个以内生家庭形成、父母利他主义和类似于美国的基线补贴为特征的模型中分析了托儿补贴的影响。我发现,取消这种补贴会造成占一生消费1.63%的福利损失,均衡调整起到了减轻这些损失的作用,而单亲家庭中越来越多的人接受这种补贴,每增加一个接受者,就会产生最高的福利收益。(j21, j26, j12, j13, j24)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deregulating Teacher Labor Markets Trends in Commuting Time of European Workers: A Cross-Country Analysis Labor Market Networks and Asset Returns Intergenerational Income Mobility and Economic Freedom as Positive Liberty Gender Identity, Co-Working Spouses and Relative Income within Households
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1