Comparative Analysis of Human Cytomegalovirus-Specific CD4+ T-Cell Frequency and Lymphoproliferative Response in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Patients

G. Piccinini, G. Comolli, E. Genini, D. Lilleri, R. Gulminetti, R. Maccario, M. Revello, G. Gerna
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Human Cytomegalovirus-Specific CD4+ T-Cell Frequency and Lymphoproliferative Response in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Patients","authors":"G. Piccinini, G. Comolli, E. Genini, D. Lilleri, R. Gulminetti, R. Maccario, M. Revello, G. Gerna","doi":"10.1128/CDLI.8.6.1225-1230.2001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Evaluation of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific T-helper immunity could contribute in optimizing anti-HCMV therapy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Testin the lymphoproliferative response (LPR) is the standard technique used to evaluate T-helper response, but its use in the routine diagnostic laboratory setting can be problematic. The most promising new alternative technique is the determination of HCMV-specific CD4+ T-cell frequency by flow cytometry detection of intracellular cytokine production after short-term antigen-specific activation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. HCMV-specific LPR and CD4+ T-cell frequency were compared in a group of 78 blood samples from 65 HIV-infected patients. The results showed concordance in 80.7% of samples. In addition, comparative analysis of sequential blood samples from 13 HIV-infected patients showed that while in about half of patients the T-helper HCMV-specific immune response remained stable during highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), in the other half declining levels of the HCMV-specific CD4+-mediated immune response were determined by either one or both assays. In conclusion, our data suggest that the determination of HCMV-specific CD4+ T-cell frequency can be considered a valuable alternative to the LPR test for the detection of HCMV-specific T-helper response in HIV-infected patients. It could facilitate wider screening of anti-HCMV T-helper activity in HIV-infected patients, with potential benefits for clinicians in deciding strategies of discontinuation or maintenance of anti-HCMV therapy.","PeriodicalId":10395,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology","volume":"130 1","pages":"1225 - 1230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.8.6.1225-1230.2001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT Evaluation of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific T-helper immunity could contribute in optimizing anti-HCMV therapy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Testin the lymphoproliferative response (LPR) is the standard technique used to evaluate T-helper response, but its use in the routine diagnostic laboratory setting can be problematic. The most promising new alternative technique is the determination of HCMV-specific CD4+ T-cell frequency by flow cytometry detection of intracellular cytokine production after short-term antigen-specific activation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. HCMV-specific LPR and CD4+ T-cell frequency were compared in a group of 78 blood samples from 65 HIV-infected patients. The results showed concordance in 80.7% of samples. In addition, comparative analysis of sequential blood samples from 13 HIV-infected patients showed that while in about half of patients the T-helper HCMV-specific immune response remained stable during highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), in the other half declining levels of the HCMV-specific CD4+-mediated immune response were determined by either one or both assays. In conclusion, our data suggest that the determination of HCMV-specific CD4+ T-cell frequency can be considered a valuable alternative to the LPR test for the detection of HCMV-specific T-helper response in HIV-infected patients. It could facilitate wider screening of anti-HCMV T-helper activity in HIV-infected patients, with potential benefits for clinicians in deciding strategies of discontinuation or maintenance of anti-HCMV therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类免疫缺陷病毒阳性患者巨细胞病毒特异性CD4+ t细胞频率和淋巴细胞增殖反应的比较分析
评估人类巨细胞病毒(HCMV)特异性t辅助免疫有助于优化人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染患者的抗HCMV治疗。测试淋巴增生性反应(LPR)是用于评估t辅助反应的标准技术,但其在常规诊断实验室环境中的使用可能存在问题。最有前途的新替代技术是通过流式细胞术检测外周血单个核细胞短期抗原特异性激活后细胞内细胞因子的产生来测定hcmv特异性CD4+ t细胞频率。比较了65例hiv感染者的78份血液样本中hcmv特异性LPR和CD4+ t细胞频率。结果表明,80.7%的样品具有一致性。此外,对13名hiv感染患者的连续血液样本进行比较分析显示,虽然在大约一半的患者中,t -辅助性hcmv特异性免疫反应在高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)期间保持稳定,但在另一半患者中,hcmv特异性CD4+介导的免疫反应水平下降是由一种或两种检测确定的。总之,我们的数据表明,hcmv特异性CD4+ t细胞频率的测定可以被认为是LPR试验检测hiv感染患者hcmv特异性t辅助反应的有价值的替代方法。它可以促进在hiv感染患者中更广泛地筛查抗hcmv t辅助活性,对临床医生决定停止或维持抗hcmv治疗的策略有潜在的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunoglobulin G1 Antibody Response toHelicobacter pylori Heat Shock Protein 60 Is Closely Associated with Low-Grade Gastric Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma Antibodies against Streptococcus agalactiae Proteins cα and R4 in Sera from Pregnant Women from Norway and Zimbabwe Cystatin Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Serodiagnosis of Human Clonorchiasis and Profile of Captured Antigenic Protein of Clonorchis sinensis Recognition of Multiple Classes of Hepatitis C Antibodies Increases Detection Sensitivity in Oral Fluid Circulating Inflammatory Mediators in Patients with Fever: Predicting Bloodstream Infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1