Endometrial Cancer and The Role of Statins

Ammar Humayun, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, Syed Arish Haider, M. H. Arshad, Ekta Golani
{"title":"Endometrial Cancer and The Role of Statins","authors":"Ammar Humayun, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, Syed Arish Haider, M. H. Arshad, Ekta Golani","doi":"10.4103/1947-2714.172855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, \n \nAccording to the new guidelines published by the American College of Cardiology, it is predicted by experts that statins will become one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in the age group of 40-75 years.[1] Statins have been clearly shown to improve morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Recently, the beneficial effect of statins on the prognosis and risk of various cancers including gynecological malignancies has also been highlighted in multiple studies. \n \nEndometrial cancer, the most common cancer of the female genital tract, has already caused more than 10,000 mortalities in the United States alone in the year 2015.[2] With advanced-stage endometrial cancer presenting with an extremely poor outcome, it is important that factors that can help to decrease the risk of endometrial cancer should be thoroughly investigated. The role of statins in this regard has been highly debatable in the recent past. In an attempt to collect updated evidence, we conducted an extensive literature search utilizing Medline (PubMed and OvidSP) and Cochrane Library to identify all possible studies that have investigated the impact of statins on the risk and prognosis of endometrial cancer. \n \nThirteen relevant citations were found[3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] and are shown in Tables ​Tables11 and ​and2.2. Three studies[5,6,7] showed that statins significantly reduce the risk of developing endometrial cancer while seven studies[8,9,10,11,12,13,14] reported no such relationship. The three studies that documented favorable impact of statins on endometrial cancers were all limited by lack of randomization, single center locations, relatively small sample sizes, and confounders as patients had multiple comorbidities. Only three studies[3,4,12] were found that investigated the effect of statins on endometrial cancer survival, which are shown in Table 2. Nevadunsky et al.[3] reported that statins significantly (HR = 0.63) prolong survival in patients with endometrial cancer while the other two studies[4,12] concluded that statins have no significant effect on mortality. These studies have not mentioned if they have looked at progression-free survival or overall survival versus a cancer specific outcome such as time to recurrence. \n \n \n \nTable 1 \n \nSummary of the evidence regarding role of statins in the risk of endometrial cancer \n \n \n \n \n \nTable 2 \n \nSummary of evidence regarding statins and outcome of endometrial cancer \n \n \n \nIt is vital to consider the duration of statin usage as well. In a recent meta-analysis by Liu et al.,[15] it was shown that when statins were taken for greater than 5 years, the risk of endometrial cancer was reduced by 31%. Moreover, they reported that studies conducted in Asian populations only had a significant relationship when all potential confounders were considered. It is important to note that patients who take statins tend to be elderly, have multiple comorbidities, and medication regimens including use of hormonal therapy; hence it is imperative to take these confounders into account. \n \nThese conflicting outcomes warrant further clinical investigation on the role of statins in endometrial cancer. We suggest that histological differentiation of endometrial cancer must also be analyzed in the future studies as different subtypes of endometrial cancer are closely linked with the prognosis. Moreover, randomized clinical trials are needed in this field urgently to eliminate selection, recall, and confounding bias inherent to observational studies. \n \nFinancial support and sponsorship \nNil. \n \n \nConflicts of interest \nThere are no conflicts of interest.","PeriodicalId":19703,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"577 - 579"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.172855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear Editor, According to the new guidelines published by the American College of Cardiology, it is predicted by experts that statins will become one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in the age group of 40-75 years.[1] Statins have been clearly shown to improve morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Recently, the beneficial effect of statins on the prognosis and risk of various cancers including gynecological malignancies has also been highlighted in multiple studies. Endometrial cancer, the most common cancer of the female genital tract, has already caused more than 10,000 mortalities in the United States alone in the year 2015.[2] With advanced-stage endometrial cancer presenting with an extremely poor outcome, it is important that factors that can help to decrease the risk of endometrial cancer should be thoroughly investigated. The role of statins in this regard has been highly debatable in the recent past. In an attempt to collect updated evidence, we conducted an extensive literature search utilizing Medline (PubMed and OvidSP) and Cochrane Library to identify all possible studies that have investigated the impact of statins on the risk and prognosis of endometrial cancer. Thirteen relevant citations were found[3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] and are shown in Tables ​Tables11 and ​and2.2. Three studies[5,6,7] showed that statins significantly reduce the risk of developing endometrial cancer while seven studies[8,9,10,11,12,13,14] reported no such relationship. The three studies that documented favorable impact of statins on endometrial cancers were all limited by lack of randomization, single center locations, relatively small sample sizes, and confounders as patients had multiple comorbidities. Only three studies[3,4,12] were found that investigated the effect of statins on endometrial cancer survival, which are shown in Table 2. Nevadunsky et al.[3] reported that statins significantly (HR = 0.63) prolong survival in patients with endometrial cancer while the other two studies[4,12] concluded that statins have no significant effect on mortality. These studies have not mentioned if they have looked at progression-free survival or overall survival versus a cancer specific outcome such as time to recurrence. Table 1 Summary of the evidence regarding role of statins in the risk of endometrial cancer Table 2 Summary of evidence regarding statins and outcome of endometrial cancer It is vital to consider the duration of statin usage as well. In a recent meta-analysis by Liu et al.,[15] it was shown that when statins were taken for greater than 5 years, the risk of endometrial cancer was reduced by 31%. Moreover, they reported that studies conducted in Asian populations only had a significant relationship when all potential confounders were considered. It is important to note that patients who take statins tend to be elderly, have multiple comorbidities, and medication regimens including use of hormonal therapy; hence it is imperative to take these confounders into account. These conflicting outcomes warrant further clinical investigation on the role of statins in endometrial cancer. We suggest that histological differentiation of endometrial cancer must also be analyzed in the future studies as different subtypes of endometrial cancer are closely linked with the prognosis. Moreover, randomized clinical trials are needed in this field urgently to eliminate selection, recall, and confounding bias inherent to observational studies. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜癌和他汀类药物的作用
亲爱的编辑:根据美国心脏病学会发布的新指南,专家预测他汀类药物将成为40-75岁人群中最常用的处方药之一。[1]他汀类药物已被明确证明可改善心血管疾病患者的发病率和死亡率。近年来,他汀类药物对包括妇科恶性肿瘤在内的各种癌症的预后和风险的有益作用也在多项研究中得到强调。子宫内膜癌是女性生殖道最常见的癌症,仅2015年在美国就已经造成了1万多人死亡。[2]由于晚期子宫内膜癌的预后极差,因此彻底研究有助于降低子宫内膜癌风险的因素是很重要的。他汀类药物在这方面的作用最近一直备受争议。为了收集最新的证据,我们利用Medline (PubMed和OvidSP)和Cochrane图书馆进行了广泛的文献检索,以确定所有可能调查他汀类药物对子宫内膜癌风险和预后影响的研究。共发现13条相关引文[3、4、5、6、7、8、9、10、11、12、13、14、15],见表11和表2.2。三项研究[5,6,7]显示他汀类药物可显著降低发生子宫内膜癌的风险,而七项研究[8,9,10,11,12,13,14]则未报道这种关系。三项证明他汀类药物对子宫内膜癌有利影响的研究都受到缺乏随机化、单中心位置、相对较小的样本量以及患者有多种合并症的混杂因素的限制。仅有3项研究[3,4,12]研究了他汀类药物对子宫内膜癌生存的影响,见表2。Nevadunsky等[3]报道他汀类药物可显著延长子宫内膜癌患者的生存期(HR = 0.63),而其他两项研究[4,12]则认为他汀类药物对死亡率无显著影响。这些研究没有提到他们是否观察了无进展生存期或总生存期与癌症特定结果(如复发时间)的对比。表2关于他汀类药物与子宫内膜癌预后的证据总结考虑他汀类药物使用的持续时间也是至关重要的。Liu等人最近的一项荟萃分析[15]显示,服用他汀类药物超过5年,子宫内膜癌的风险降低31%。此外,他们报告说,在亚洲人群中进行的研究只有在考虑了所有潜在的混杂因素后才有显著的关系。值得注意的是,服用他汀类药物的患者往往是老年人,有多种合并症,药物方案包括使用激素治疗;因此,必须考虑到这些混杂因素。这些相互矛盾的结果值得进一步研究他汀类药物在子宫内膜癌中的作用。由于子宫内膜癌的不同亚型与预后密切相关,我们建议在未来的研究中还必须分析子宫内膜癌的组织学分化。此外,该领域迫切需要随机临床试验,以消除观察性研究固有的选择、回忆和混淆偏倚。财政支持及赞助无。利益冲突没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Facial Palsy, a Disorder Belonging to Influential Neurological Dynasty: Review of Literature. The Usage of Social Networking Sites by Medical Students for Educational Purposes: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. The Evaluation of Syncope in a Predominantly Black Population: Focus on Neuroimaging. Associations between Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and Lipids, Lipoprotein Cholesterols, and Homocysteine. The Effect of Renin-angiotensin System Inhibitors on Kidney Allograft Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1