Improvement in Kidney Function after Discontinuation of Fenofibrate in Outpatient Nephrology Consultation for Chronic Kidney Disease

C. Hernandez-Arroyo, S. Kanduri, R. Justiniano, Pedro J. Martinez- Pitre, J. Velez
{"title":"Improvement in Kidney Function after Discontinuation of Fenofibrate in Outpatient Nephrology Consultation for Chronic Kidney Disease","authors":"C. Hernandez-Arroyo, S. Kanduri, R. Justiniano, Pedro J. Martinez- Pitre, J. Velez","doi":"10.1159/000522081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: It has been noted in observational and interventional studies that individuals exposed to fenofibrate can exhibit a rise in serum creatinine (sCr) concentration. However, it is not known to what extent this phenomenon impacts kidney function in patients who are referred to a nephrology clinic for consultation for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of patients referred to our nephrology clinic for a new evaluation of a rise in sCr or worsening CKD and who were on fenofibrate therapy. We examined the effect of discontinuation of fenofibrate on kidney function, change in sCr, and estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: A total of 22 patients (59% women, 86% White, 59% with type 2 diabetes, and 18% with peripheral arterial disease) were captured over 2.5 years. Median sCr at the time of fenofibrate discontinuation was 1.9 (1.1–3.3) mg/dL and eGFR, 32 (17–57) mL/min; proteinuria was absent in 17 (77%). Upon discontinuation of fenofibrate, median sCr decreased to 1.5 (0.9–2.4), 1.4 (1.0–2.5), and 1.4 (1.0–2.3) mg/dL at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.05); whereas median eGFR increased to 44 (27–71), 45 (23–71), and 42 (21–71) mL/min, respectively (p < 0.05). A ≥30% rise in eGFR was observed in 59% of the patients at 3 months, and it persisted in 45% and 50% of patients at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Conclusion: Discontinuation of fenofibrate in patients referred for CKD evaluation can result in sustained reduction in sCr in about half of the patients and for up to 1 year. There is a need to raise awareness among primary practitioners about this phenomenon. Recognition of fenofibrate as a cause of rise in sCr could reduce unnecessary nephrology consultation and resource utilization.","PeriodicalId":17810,"journal":{"name":"Kidney and Blood Pressure Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney and Blood Pressure Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000522081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It has been noted in observational and interventional studies that individuals exposed to fenofibrate can exhibit a rise in serum creatinine (sCr) concentration. However, it is not known to what extent this phenomenon impacts kidney function in patients who are referred to a nephrology clinic for consultation for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of patients referred to our nephrology clinic for a new evaluation of a rise in sCr or worsening CKD and who were on fenofibrate therapy. We examined the effect of discontinuation of fenofibrate on kidney function, change in sCr, and estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: A total of 22 patients (59% women, 86% White, 59% with type 2 diabetes, and 18% with peripheral arterial disease) were captured over 2.5 years. Median sCr at the time of fenofibrate discontinuation was 1.9 (1.1–3.3) mg/dL and eGFR, 32 (17–57) mL/min; proteinuria was absent in 17 (77%). Upon discontinuation of fenofibrate, median sCr decreased to 1.5 (0.9–2.4), 1.4 (1.0–2.5), and 1.4 (1.0–2.3) mg/dL at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.05); whereas median eGFR increased to 44 (27–71), 45 (23–71), and 42 (21–71) mL/min, respectively (p < 0.05). A ≥30% rise in eGFR was observed in 59% of the patients at 3 months, and it persisted in 45% and 50% of patients at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Conclusion: Discontinuation of fenofibrate in patients referred for CKD evaluation can result in sustained reduction in sCr in about half of the patients and for up to 1 year. There is a need to raise awareness among primary practitioners about this phenomenon. Recognition of fenofibrate as a cause of rise in sCr could reduce unnecessary nephrology consultation and resource utilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非诺贝特在慢性肾病门诊肾科会诊后肾功能的改善
背景:在观察性和干预性研究中已经注意到,暴露于非诺贝特的个体可以表现出血清肌酐(sCr)浓度升高。然而,目前尚不清楚这种现象在多大程度上影响到肾病诊所咨询慢性肾病(CKD)患者的肾功能。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,患者转到我们的肾脏病诊所,对sCr上升或CKD恶化进行新的评估,并接受非诺贝特治疗。我们研究了停药非诺贝特对肾功能、sCr变化和3、6、12个月肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的影响。结果:在2.5年的时间里,共捕获了22例患者(59%为女性,86%为白人,59%为2型糖尿病,18%为外周动脉疾病)。非诺贝特停药时的中位sCr为1.9 (1.1-3.3)mg/dL, eGFR为32 (17-57)mL/min;17例(77%)无蛋白尿。停用非诺贝特后,3个月、6个月和12个月的中位sCr分别降至1.5(0.9-2.4)、1.4(1.0-2.5)和1.4 (1.0-2.3)mg/dL (p < 0.05);而中位eGFR分别升高至44(27-71)、45(23-71)和42 (21-71)mL/min (p < 0.05)。在治疗3个月时,59%的患者eGFR升高≥30%,在治疗6个月和12个月时,分别有45%和50%的患者持续升高。结论:对CKD评估的患者停用非诺贝特可导致约一半患者的sCr持续降低,且持续时间长达1年。有必要提高初级从业人员对这一现象的认识。认识到非诺贝特是sCr升高的原因,可以减少不必要的肾脏病咨询和资源利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A trial of finerenone in a patient with primary aldosteronism. In-center Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Clinical Features, Practice Patterns, and Patient Survival From a 6-year Cohort Study in China Identification of Hub Gene and Transcription Factor Related to Chronic Allograft Nephropathy Based on WGCNA Analysis How the Availability of Anti-C5a Agents Could Change the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis Effect of High-Dose Glucocorticoids on Markers of Inflammation and Bone Metabolism in Patients with Primary Glomerular Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1