Informal Learning Communities: The Other Massive Open Online 'C'

Will Hudgins, M. Lynch, Ash Schmal, Harsh Sikka, Michael Swenson, David A. Joyner
{"title":"Informal Learning Communities: The Other Massive Open Online 'C'","authors":"Will Hudgins, M. Lynch, Ash Schmal, Harsh Sikka, Michael Swenson, David A. Joyner","doi":"10.1145/3386527.3405926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the literature on learning at scale has largely focused on MOOCs, online degree programs, and AI techniques for supporting scalable learning experiences, informal learning communities have been relatively underrepresented. None-theless, these massive open online learning communities regularly draw far more engaged users than the typical MOOC. Their informal structure, however, makes them significantly more difficult to study. In this work, we take a first step toward attempting to understand these communi-ties specifically from the perspective of scale. Taking a sample of 62 such communities, we develop a tagging sys-tem for understanding the specific features and how they relate to scale. For example, just as a MOOC cannot man-ually grade every assignment, so also an informal learning community cannot approve every contribution; and just as MOOCs therefore employ autograding, informal learning communities employ crowd-sourced moderation or plat-form-driven enforcement. Using these tags, we then select several communities for deeper case studies. We also use these tags to make sense of learning-based subreddits from the popular community site Reddit, which offers an API for programmatic analysis. Based on these techniques, we offer findings about the performance of informal learning communities at scale and issue a call to include these envi-ronments more fully in future research on learning at scale.","PeriodicalId":20608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3386527.3405926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

While the literature on learning at scale has largely focused on MOOCs, online degree programs, and AI techniques for supporting scalable learning experiences, informal learning communities have been relatively underrepresented. None-theless, these massive open online learning communities regularly draw far more engaged users than the typical MOOC. Their informal structure, however, makes them significantly more difficult to study. In this work, we take a first step toward attempting to understand these communi-ties specifically from the perspective of scale. Taking a sample of 62 such communities, we develop a tagging sys-tem for understanding the specific features and how they relate to scale. For example, just as a MOOC cannot man-ually grade every assignment, so also an informal learning community cannot approve every contribution; and just as MOOCs therefore employ autograding, informal learning communities employ crowd-sourced moderation or plat-form-driven enforcement. Using these tags, we then select several communities for deeper case studies. We also use these tags to make sense of learning-based subreddits from the popular community site Reddit, which offers an API for programmatic analysis. Based on these techniques, we offer findings about the performance of informal learning communities at scale and issue a call to include these envi-ronments more fully in future research on learning at scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非正式学习社区:另一个大规模开放的在线“C”
虽然关于大规模学习的文献主要集中在mooc、在线学位课程和支持可扩展学习体验的人工智能技术上,但非正式学习社区的代表性相对不足。尽管如此,这些大规模的开放在线学习社区通常比典型的MOOC吸引更多的用户。然而,它们的非正式结构使它们的学习难度大大增加。在这项工作中,我们迈出了第一步,试图从规模的角度来理解这些社区。以62个这样的社区为样本,我们开发了一个标签系统来理解特定的特征以及它们与规模的关系。例如,就像MOOC不可能人工批改每一份作业一样,非正式的学习社区也不可能审核每一份贡献;因此,就像mooc采用自动评分一样,非正式学习社区采用众包审核或平台驱动的强制执行。使用这些标签,我们选择几个社区进行更深入的案例研究。我们还使用这些标签来理解来自流行社区网站Reddit的基于学习的子Reddit,该网站为程序化分析提供了一个API。基于这些技术,我们提供了关于大规模非正式学习社区绩效的研究结果,并呼吁在未来的大规模学习研究中更充分地包括这些环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trust, Sustainability and [email protected] L@S'22: Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, New York City, NY, USA, June 1 - 3, 2022 L@S'21: Eighth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, Virtual Event, Germany, June 22-25, 2021 Leveraging Book Indexes for Automatic Extraction of Concepts in MOOCs Evaluating Bayesian Knowledge Tracing for Estimating Learner Proficiency and Guiding Learner Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1