Welfare, Rights and Discretion

R. Goodin
{"title":"Welfare, Rights and Discretion","authors":"R. Goodin","doi":"10.1093/OJLS/6.2.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theorists in a variety of disciplines have, for quite some time now, been saying that a-perhaps the-defining feature of the welfare state is its commitment to providing a certain range of goods and services to its citizens 'as of right'.' From T. H. Marshall's classic lectures on 'Citizenship and Social Class' forward, we have grown accustomed to tracing the history of the welfare state in terms of the expanding 'rights of citizenship'.2 From the welfare rights movement of the I96os onward, we have grown accustomed to thinking of welfare rights as the clear alternatives to more odious forms of official discretion. And so on.","PeriodicalId":83137,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social welfare law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of social welfare law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OJLS/6.2.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Theorists in a variety of disciplines have, for quite some time now, been saying that a-perhaps the-defining feature of the welfare state is its commitment to providing a certain range of goods and services to its citizens 'as of right'.' From T. H. Marshall's classic lectures on 'Citizenship and Social Class' forward, we have grown accustomed to tracing the history of the welfare state in terms of the expanding 'rights of citizenship'.2 From the welfare rights movement of the I96os onward, we have grown accustomed to thinking of welfare rights as the clear alternatives to more odious forms of official discretion. And so on.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福利,权利和自由裁量权
很长一段时间以来,各种学科的理论家们一直在说,也许福利国家的定义特征是,它承诺为公民“理所当然”提供一定范围的商品和服务。从t.h.马歇尔关于“公民与社会阶级”的经典讲座开始,我们已经习惯于从扩大“公民权利”的角度来追溯福利国家的历史从20世纪60年代的福利权利运动开始,我们已经习惯于将福利权利视为更令人厌恶的官方自由裁量权形式的明确替代品。等等......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Supreme Court 1968 Term Feminism and Social Policy The Welfare State: A Self-Inflicted Crisis? Welfare Benefits, Administrative Discretion, and the Politics of the ‘New Urban Left’ The Positive Functions of Poverty 1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1