Application of Network Analysis to Description and Prediction of Assessment Outcomes

IF 0.6 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/15366367.2021.1971024
James J. Thompson
{"title":"Application of Network Analysis to Description and Prediction of Assessment Outcomes","authors":"James J. Thompson","doi":"10.1080/15366367.2021.1971024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With the use of computerized testing, ordinary assessments can capture both answer accuracy and answer response time. For the Canadian Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) numeracy and literacy subtests, person ability, person speed, question difficulty, question time intensity, fluency (rate), person fluency (skill), question fluency (load), pace (rank of response time within question), and person pace were assessed. Undirected Gaussian Graphical Model networks of the measures based on partial correlations were predictive of the measures as nodes. The population-based model extrapolated well to individual person estimations. Finally, it was shown that the “training” Canadian model generalized with minor differences to four other English-speaking PIAAC assessments (USA, Great Britain, Ireland, and New Zealand). Thus, the undirected network approach provides a heuristic that is both descriptive and predictive. However, the model is not causal and can be taken as an example of “mutualism.”","PeriodicalId":46596,"journal":{"name":"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives","volume":"3 1","pages":"121 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2021.1971024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the use of computerized testing, ordinary assessments can capture both answer accuracy and answer response time. For the Canadian Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) numeracy and literacy subtests, person ability, person speed, question difficulty, question time intensity, fluency (rate), person fluency (skill), question fluency (load), pace (rank of response time within question), and person pace were assessed. Undirected Gaussian Graphical Model networks of the measures based on partial correlations were predictive of the measures as nodes. The population-based model extrapolated well to individual person estimations. Finally, it was shown that the “training” Canadian model generalized with minor differences to four other English-speaking PIAAC assessments (USA, Great Britain, Ireland, and New Zealand). Thus, the undirected network approach provides a heuristic that is both descriptive and predictive. However, the model is not causal and can be taken as an example of “mutualism.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络分析在评价结果描述与预测中的应用
随着计算机化测试的使用,普通的评估可以捕捉到答案的准确性和答案的反应时间。对于加拿大成人能力国际评估计划(PIAAC)的计算和读写子测试,评估了个人能力、个人速度、问题难度、问题时间强度、流畅性(比率)、个人流畅性(技能)、问题流畅性(负荷)、速度(问题内反应时间的等级)和个人速度。基于偏相关的测度的无向高斯图模型网络作为节点对测度进行预测。以人口为基础的模型可以很好地推断出个人的估计。最后,研究表明,“训练”加拿大模式与其他四个以英语为母语的PIAAC评估(美国、英国、爱尔兰和新西兰)有轻微的差异。因此,无向网络方法提供了一种启发式方法,既具有描述性又具有预测性。然而,该模型不是因果关系,可以作为“互惠主义”的一个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives
Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
A Latent Trait Approach to the Measurement of Physical Fitness Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Fake News Classification The Use of Multidimensional Item Response Theory Estimations in Controlling Differential Item Functioning Opinion Instability and Measurement Errors: A G-Theory Analysis of College Students Predicting the Risk of Diabetes and Heart Disease with Machine Learning Classifiers: The Mediation Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1