Rural interprofessional primary health care team development and sustainability: establishing a research agenda

Charmaine M McPherson, Elizabeth A McGibbon
{"title":"Rural interprofessional primary health care team development and sustainability: establishing a research agenda","authors":"Charmaine M McPherson, Elizabeth A McGibbon","doi":"10.1017/S1463423610000125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Primary health care (PHC) plays a pivotal role in health system reform locally and globally. The use of well functioning interprofessional primary health care (IPHC) teams is recognized as a key strategy in widespread health system reform across global, national, and provincial jurisdictions. IPHC teams contribute to the improvement of the health and well being of the population. These teams engage in issues that are a priority for citizens, such as: providing good evidence-based care; supporting the efforts of individuals, families, and communities in leading healthy lives; actively and deliberatively involving citizens in decisions affecting their health and health care system; and addressing the systemic social, economic, and political causes of health disparities, such as poverty, violence, and rural isolation. Many jurisdictions have begun to experiment with and implement major changes in the delivery of PHC. This has required that health care managers and practitioners reconsider the ways in which they have traditionally worked. However, although many innovative PHC services were developed, the notion of how to best develop and sustain the service delivery team itself and within what contexts could have used more deliberate attention. There are no documented best practices for rural IPHC team development and sustainability in the scholarly literature. This paper presents the results of a literature review, including the empirical and conceptual evidence regarding team development, team sustainability, and the role of rural context in IPHC team development. An argument for advancing PHC research that focuses on rural IPHC team development and sustainability is posited.","PeriodicalId":20471,"journal":{"name":"Primary Health Care Research & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Health Care Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423610000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Primary health care (PHC) plays a pivotal role in health system reform locally and globally. The use of well functioning interprofessional primary health care (IPHC) teams is recognized as a key strategy in widespread health system reform across global, national, and provincial jurisdictions. IPHC teams contribute to the improvement of the health and well being of the population. These teams engage in issues that are a priority for citizens, such as: providing good evidence-based care; supporting the efforts of individuals, families, and communities in leading healthy lives; actively and deliberatively involving citizens in decisions affecting their health and health care system; and addressing the systemic social, economic, and political causes of health disparities, such as poverty, violence, and rural isolation. Many jurisdictions have begun to experiment with and implement major changes in the delivery of PHC. This has required that health care managers and practitioners reconsider the ways in which they have traditionally worked. However, although many innovative PHC services were developed, the notion of how to best develop and sustain the service delivery team itself and within what contexts could have used more deliberate attention. There are no documented best practices for rural IPHC team development and sustainability in the scholarly literature. This paper presents the results of a literature review, including the empirical and conceptual evidence regarding team development, team sustainability, and the role of rural context in IPHC team development. An argument for advancing PHC research that focuses on rural IPHC team development and sustainability is posited.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村跨专业初级保健队伍的发展和可持续性:制定研究议程
初级卫生保健(PHC)在地方和全球卫生系统改革中发挥着关键作用。使用运作良好的跨专业初级卫生保健(IPHC)团队被认为是全球、国家和省级司法管辖区广泛进行卫生系统改革的一项关键战略。卫生保健中心各小组为改善人民的健康和福祉作出贡献。这些团队致力于公民优先考虑的问题,例如:提供良好的循证护理;支持个人、家庭和社区努力过上健康的生活;积极和审慎地让公民参与影响其健康和卫生保健系统的决策;解决卫生差距的系统性社会、经济和政治原因,如贫困、暴力和农村孤立。许多司法管辖区已开始试验并实施初级保健服务方面的重大变革。这就要求卫生保健管理人员和从业人员重新考虑他们传统的工作方式。然而,尽管开发了许多创新的初级保健服务,但如何最好地发展和维持服务提供团队本身以及在什么情况下提供服务的概念本应得到更多的深思熟虑的关注。在学术文献中没有记录农村IPHC团队发展和可持续性的最佳实践。本文介绍了一项文献综述的结果,包括关于团队发展、团队可持续性和农村环境在IPHC团队发展中的作用的实证和概念证据。提出了推进初级卫生保健研究的论点,重点是农村初级卫生保健团队的发展和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health risk appraisal in older people 7: long-acting benzodiazepine use in community-dwelling older adults in London: is it related to physical or psychological factors? Collaborative Care model in mental health. Scope and experiences after three years of activity in Mexico City Health team for the elderly: a feasibility study for preventive home visits Primary care and the public’s health: evidence from service development initiatives Perception of measures for dealing with Ebola disease in primary care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1