Differences in clinician versus patient recording of comorbidities in PROMs: Small changes, big impact

1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Pub Date : 2017-04-01 DOI:10.1302/2048-0105.62.360514
A. Singh, R. Collins, J. Wimhurst
{"title":"Differences in clinician versus patient recording of comorbidities in PROMs: Small changes, big impact","authors":"A. Singh, R. Collins, J. Wimhurst","doi":"10.1302/2048-0105.62.360514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A data request was made from the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) regarding patients who had undergone a primary total knee replacement (TKR) at the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital in 2014. In total, 576 patients had received post-operative PROMs questionnaires in 2014. Complete information was available for 195 patients, which forms the basis of this analysis. The patient letters and the pre-operative assessment documentation on our electronic system (Bluespier) were then reviewed. The comorbidities that the clinician felt would apply to that patient were recorded from the list provided in the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and were then compared with what the patients had recorded.\n\nIn total, there were 189 additional comorbidities identified from our notes review. Of these, 95 would alter the predicted OKS score in 77 patients. There was a significant change in average predicted OKS score from 33.7 ± 3.9 to 32.3 ± 4.0 (p = 0.02) in the 77 patients who had additional OKS-altering comorbidities. When looking at the case-mix adjustment, the original mean adjustment was -0.83 (± 1.1). After adjusting for clinician-reported comorbidities, there was a significant change in the mean to -1.40 (± 1.4) (p < 0.0001). After the relevant recalculations were carried out, the adjusted average health gain went from 15.254 to 15.907. This is an improvement of 0.653.\n\nThe small change of ensuring accurate comorbidity recording can have an impact on the adjusted average health gain for a hospital. This is important information: patients report comorbidities differently to clinicians, and often overrate their health. Despite the limitation of this comorbidity data, hospital performance data, which are publically available, are based on this case-mix and comorbidity adjustment. Care clearly needs to be taken in the interpretation of these case mix-adjusted scores.\n\nThe PROMs (Patient-Reported Outcome Measures) programme, embedded within the NJR, …","PeriodicalId":50250,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","volume":"43 1","pages":"2-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2048-0105.62.360514","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A data request was made from the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) regarding patients who had undergone a primary total knee replacement (TKR) at the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital in 2014. In total, 576 patients had received post-operative PROMs questionnaires in 2014. Complete information was available for 195 patients, which forms the basis of this analysis. The patient letters and the pre-operative assessment documentation on our electronic system (Bluespier) were then reviewed. The comorbidities that the clinician felt would apply to that patient were recorded from the list provided in the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and were then compared with what the patients had recorded. In total, there were 189 additional comorbidities identified from our notes review. Of these, 95 would alter the predicted OKS score in 77 patients. There was a significant change in average predicted OKS score from 33.7 ± 3.9 to 32.3 ± 4.0 (p = 0.02) in the 77 patients who had additional OKS-altering comorbidities. When looking at the case-mix adjustment, the original mean adjustment was -0.83 (± 1.1). After adjusting for clinician-reported comorbidities, there was a significant change in the mean to -1.40 (± 1.4) (p < 0.0001). After the relevant recalculations were carried out, the adjusted average health gain went from 15.254 to 15.907. This is an improvement of 0.653. The small change of ensuring accurate comorbidity recording can have an impact on the adjusted average health gain for a hospital. This is important information: patients report comorbidities differently to clinicians, and often overrate their health. Despite the limitation of this comorbidity data, hospital performance data, which are publically available, are based on this case-mix and comorbidity adjustment. Care clearly needs to be taken in the interpretation of these case mix-adjusted scores. The PROMs (Patient-Reported Outcome Measures) programme, embedded within the NJR, …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医生与患者对PROMs合并症记录的差异:小变化,大影响
健康和社会保健信息中心(HSCIC)要求提供2014年在诺福克和诺维奇医院接受原发性全膝关节置换术(TKR)的患者的数据。2014年共576例患者接受术后PROMs问卷调查。195例患者的完整信息构成了本分析的基础。然后查看我们电子系统(Bluespier)上的患者来信和术前评估文件。临床医生认为将适用于该患者的合并症从牛津膝关节评分(OKS)提供的列表中记录下来,然后与患者的记录进行比较。总的来说,从我们的记录回顾中发现了189个额外的合并症。其中,95个会改变77名患者的预期OKS评分。在77例有其他改变OKS合并症的患者中,平均预测OKS评分从33.7±3.9变为32.3±4.0 (p = 0.02)。当观察病例组合调整时,原始平均调整为-0.83(±1.1)。在调整了临床报告的合并症后,平均变化为-1.40(±1.4)(p < 0.0001)。重新进行相关计算后,调整后的平均生命增益从15.254上升到15.907。这是一个0.653的改进。确保准确的合并症记录的微小变化会对医院调整后的平均健康收益产生影响。这是一个重要的信息:患者对合并症的报告与临床医生不同,而且往往高估了他们的健康状况。尽管这些合并症数据存在局限性,但公开的医院表现数据是基于这种病例组合和合并症调整。在解释这些混合调整分数时显然需要小心。在NJR中嵌入的PROMs(患者报告的结果测量)计划…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In Patients with Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis, Cementless and Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasties Did Not Differ for Functional Outcomes at 2 Years Implant-Positioning and Patient Factors Associated with Acromial and Scapular Spine Fractures After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty In Older Patients with an Unreconstructible Distal Humeral Fracture, Elbow Hemiarthroplasty and Total Elbow Arthroplasty Did Not Differ for Function at ≥2 Years Newton C. McCollough III Robert G. (Bob) Volz 1932-2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1