Development and Validation of Situational Judgement Test to Measure Continuous Learning Competency

Yunita Faela Nisa, Jahja Umar, Puspita Dian Arista, Helena Widaningrum, Bahrul Hayat
{"title":"Development and Validation of Situational Judgement Test to Measure Continuous Learning Competency","authors":"Yunita Faela Nisa, Jahja Umar, Puspita Dian Arista, Helena Widaningrum, Bahrul Hayat","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v11i1.25302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measuring continuous learning (CL) competency is beneficial to achieving success for individuals and organizations. For this reason, the availability of a brief but valid instrument is crucial. This study aims to develop a valid instrument to measure the CL using a situational judgment test (SJT). The instrument was developed and validated using respondents of 502 employees at the supervisory level in the electrical industry (with age M=30.13, SD=6.17). For content validity, we first held focus group discussions with supervisors and managers to identify and develop some essential characteristics of the CL. Subject matter experts were involved in writing and reviewing the items. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the construct validity, and it was found that 12 of 13 items fitted a unidimensional model. All the factor loadings were statistically significant (p<.05). A further test for parallel assumption was done to check the tau-equivalence. This test is vital because raw scores are mostly used in daily practice rather than scaled scores. The results showed that 12 items met the tau equivalent requirement. For further research, scoring for multiple-choice SJTs using the nominal response model (NRM) could be considered since there was a tendency for some of the questions to elicit ambiguous choices.","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v11i1.25302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring continuous learning (CL) competency is beneficial to achieving success for individuals and organizations. For this reason, the availability of a brief but valid instrument is crucial. This study aims to develop a valid instrument to measure the CL using a situational judgment test (SJT). The instrument was developed and validated using respondents of 502 employees at the supervisory level in the electrical industry (with age M=30.13, SD=6.17). For content validity, we first held focus group discussions with supervisors and managers to identify and develop some essential characteristics of the CL. Subject matter experts were involved in writing and reviewing the items. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the construct validity, and it was found that 12 of 13 items fitted a unidimensional model. All the factor loadings were statistically significant (p<.05). A further test for parallel assumption was done to check the tau-equivalence. This test is vital because raw scores are mostly used in daily practice rather than scaled scores. The results showed that 12 items met the tau equivalent requirement. For further research, scoring for multiple-choice SJTs using the nominal response model (NRM) could be considered since there was a tendency for some of the questions to elicit ambiguous choices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续学习能力情境判断测验的开发与验证
测量持续学习(CL)能力对个人和组织取得成功都是有益的。因此,获得一份简短但有效的文书至关重要。本研究旨在利用情境判断测验(SJT)来开发一种有效的工具来测量自我认知能力。该工具的开发和验证使用了502名电气行业主管级员工(年龄M=30.13, SD=6.17)的受访者。对于内容效度,我们首先与主管和经理进行焦点小组讨论,以确定和发展语言的一些基本特征。主题专家参与撰写和审查项目。对构念效度进行验证性因子分析,发现13个项目中有12个项目符合单维模型。各因子负荷均有统计学意义(p< 0.05)。对平行假设作了进一步的检验,以验证其等效性。这个测试是至关重要的,因为原始分数主要用于日常练习,而不是缩放分数。结果表明,有12个项目符合tau当量要求。在进一步的研究中,可以考虑使用名义反应模型(NRM)对选择题进行评分,因为有些问题倾向于引发模棱两可的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Construct Validity of Posttraumatic Growth Inventory in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic Multidimensional Rasch Analysis of Gender Differences in Tes Intelegensi Kolektif Indonesia–Tinggi (TIKI-T) Adaptation and Validation of the Indonesian version of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire The Development of Cyberbullying in Social Media Scale Metacognitive Skills Assessment in Research-Proposal Writing (MSARPW) in the Indonesian University Context: Scale Development and Validation Using Multidimensional Item Response Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1