Origin of horsetails and the role of whole-genome duplication in plant macroevolution

James W. Clark, Mark N. Puttick, P. Donoghue
{"title":"Origin of horsetails and the role of whole-genome duplication in plant macroevolution","authors":"James W. Clark, Mark N. Puttick, P. Donoghue","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2019.1662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whole-genome duplication (WGD) has occurred commonly in land plant evolution and it is often invoked as a causal agent in diversification, phenotypic and developmental innovation, as well as conferring extinction resistance. The ancient and iconic lineage of Equisetum is no exception, where WGD has been inferred to have occurred prior to the Cretaceous–Palaeogene (K–Pg) boundary, coincident with WGD events in angiosperms. In the absence of high species diversity, WGD in Equisetum is interpreted to have facilitated the long-term survival of the lineage. However, this characterization remains uncertain as these analyses of the Equisetum WGD event have not accounted for fossil diversity. Here, we analyse additional available transcriptomes and summarize the fossil record. Our results confirm support for at least one WGD event shared among the majority of extant Equisetum species. Furthermore, we use improved dating methods to constrain the age of gene duplication in geological time and identify two successive Equisetum WGD events. The two WGD events occurred during the Carboniferous and Triassic, respectively, rather than in association with the K–Pg boundary. WGD events are believed to drive high rates of trait evolution and innovations, but analysed trends of morphological evolution across the historical diversity of Equisetum provide little evidence for further macroevolutionary consequences following WGD. WGD events cannot have conferred extinction resistance to the Equisetum lineage through the K–Pg boundary since the ploidy events occurred hundreds of millions of years before this mass extinction and we find evidence of extinction among fossil polyploid Equisetum lineages. Our findings precipitate the need for a review of the proposed roles of WGDs in biological innovation and extinction survival in angiosperm and non-angiosperm lineages alike.","PeriodicalId":20609,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Whole-genome duplication (WGD) has occurred commonly in land plant evolution and it is often invoked as a causal agent in diversification, phenotypic and developmental innovation, as well as conferring extinction resistance. The ancient and iconic lineage of Equisetum is no exception, where WGD has been inferred to have occurred prior to the Cretaceous–Palaeogene (K–Pg) boundary, coincident with WGD events in angiosperms. In the absence of high species diversity, WGD in Equisetum is interpreted to have facilitated the long-term survival of the lineage. However, this characterization remains uncertain as these analyses of the Equisetum WGD event have not accounted for fossil diversity. Here, we analyse additional available transcriptomes and summarize the fossil record. Our results confirm support for at least one WGD event shared among the majority of extant Equisetum species. Furthermore, we use improved dating methods to constrain the age of gene duplication in geological time and identify two successive Equisetum WGD events. The two WGD events occurred during the Carboniferous and Triassic, respectively, rather than in association with the K–Pg boundary. WGD events are believed to drive high rates of trait evolution and innovations, but analysed trends of morphological evolution across the historical diversity of Equisetum provide little evidence for further macroevolutionary consequences following WGD. WGD events cannot have conferred extinction resistance to the Equisetum lineage through the K–Pg boundary since the ploidy events occurred hundreds of millions of years before this mass extinction and we find evidence of extinction among fossil polyploid Equisetum lineages. Our findings precipitate the need for a review of the proposed roles of WGDs in biological innovation and extinction survival in angiosperm and non-angiosperm lineages alike.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马尾的起源及全基因组复制在植物宏观进化中的作用
全基因组重复(WGD)在陆地植物的进化过程中很常见,它经常被认为是多样性、表型和发育创新以及赋予灭绝抗性的原因。古老而标志性的Equisetum谱系也不例外,其WGD被推断发生在白垩纪-古近纪(K-Pg)边界之前,与被子植物的WGD事件一致。在缺乏高物种多样性的情况下,木贼的WGD被解释为促进了谱系的长期生存。然而,这种特征仍然不确定,因为这些对Equisetum WGD事件的分析没有考虑到化石多样性。在这里,我们分析了其他可用的转录组,并总结了化石记录。我们的研究结果证实了至少一个WGD事件在大多数现存木贼属物种中共享的支持。此外,我们使用改进的测年方法来限制基因复制在地质时间上的年龄,并确定了两个连续的Equisetum WGD事件。这两次WGD事件分别发生在石炭系和三叠系,而与K-Pg界无关。WGD事件被认为推动了性状进化和创新的高速率,但分析了鼠尾草历史多样性的形态进化趋势,几乎没有证据表明WGD之后的进一步宏观进化后果。WGD事件不可能通过K-Pg边界赋予鼠尾草谱系灭绝抗性,因为倍性事件发生在这次大灭绝之前的数亿年,我们在化石多倍体鼠尾草谱系中发现了灭绝的证据。我们的发现促使我们有必要对WGDs在被子植物和非被子植物谱系的生物创新和灭绝生存中的作用进行回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Still air resistance during walking and running Functional plasticity of the swim bladder as an acoustic organ for communication in a vocal fish Millennial processes of population decline, range contraction and near extinction of the European bison Variation in personality shaped by evolutionary history, genotype and developmental plasticity in response to feeding modalities in the Arctic charr Magnetic fields, cancer and circadian rhythms: hypotheses on the relevance of intermittence and cycling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1