Using Agents to Model the Kill Chain of the Ballistic Missile Defense System

IF 0.2 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Naval Engineers Journal Pub Date : 2011-09-01 DOI:10.1111/J.1559-3584.2011.00336.X
O. Holland, SARA E. Wallace
{"title":"Using Agents to Model the Kill Chain of the Ballistic Missile Defense System","authors":"O. Holland, SARA E. Wallace","doi":"10.1111/J.1559-3584.2011.00336.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deterministic models have long been used to model the individual effectiveness of elements of the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS). Agent-based models (ABMs) emphasize the specification of the individual components comprising a system and demonstrate higher order system properties through the interactions of those components. ABMs are particularly suited to (1) complex systems where it is easier to understand or observe the individual components rather than the dynamics that govern their interactions and (2) systems where empirical data is insufficient to provide statistical representations. New missions and capabilities desired by national leadership call for increased interaction between the BMDS elements and their subsystems. New capabilities and mission threads include launch on remote and engage on remote capabilities as well as a robust missile defense system capable of defending against threat raids, debris, and decoys. These new capabilities and mission threads may require modifications to kill chains and command and control constructs as well as improved coordination and performance. These capabilities must be realized through modifications to programs of record and integration across elements of the system that have their own independent programmatic momentum. A robust missile defense system must be achieved through a construct of layered defenses. Change in capabilities requires analysis of the complex interdependencies between Standard Missile (SM-3), SPY, and BMDS elements such as PATRIOT, Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense, Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System, etc. Synergy among the systems (termed ‘‘elements’’) is required to meet the new challenges, which can be accomplished through systems of systems engineering. Definition and testing of the interactions between the systems are crucial to provide situational awareness via analysis of data transfer between the elements. ABMs are a tool that allows qualitative evaluation of these interactions of the complex BMDS. This paper presents an investigation of agent-based modeling as a method to explore the system interrelationships and evaluate the indeterminacy of the BMDS kill chain.","PeriodicalId":49775,"journal":{"name":"Naval Engineers Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"141-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval Engineers Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1559-3584.2011.00336.X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Deterministic models have long been used to model the individual effectiveness of elements of the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS). Agent-based models (ABMs) emphasize the specification of the individual components comprising a system and demonstrate higher order system properties through the interactions of those components. ABMs are particularly suited to (1) complex systems where it is easier to understand or observe the individual components rather than the dynamics that govern their interactions and (2) systems where empirical data is insufficient to provide statistical representations. New missions and capabilities desired by national leadership call for increased interaction between the BMDS elements and their subsystems. New capabilities and mission threads include launch on remote and engage on remote capabilities as well as a robust missile defense system capable of defending against threat raids, debris, and decoys. These new capabilities and mission threads may require modifications to kill chains and command and control constructs as well as improved coordination and performance. These capabilities must be realized through modifications to programs of record and integration across elements of the system that have their own independent programmatic momentum. A robust missile defense system must be achieved through a construct of layered defenses. Change in capabilities requires analysis of the complex interdependencies between Standard Missile (SM-3), SPY, and BMDS elements such as PATRIOT, Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense, Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System, etc. Synergy among the systems (termed ‘‘elements’’) is required to meet the new challenges, which can be accomplished through systems of systems engineering. Definition and testing of the interactions between the systems are crucial to provide situational awareness via analysis of data transfer between the elements. ABMs are a tool that allows qualitative evaluation of these interactions of the complex BMDS. This paper presents an investigation of agent-based modeling as a method to explore the system interrelationships and evaluate the indeterminacy of the BMDS kill chain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用智能体对弹道导弹防御系统杀伤链进行建模
长期以来,确定性模型一直被用于对弹道导弹防御系统(BMDS)各组成部分的效能进行建模。基于代理的模型(ABMs)强调组成系统的单个组件的规范,并通过这些组件的交互演示高阶系统属性。ABMs特别适合于(1)复杂的系统,在这些系统中更容易理解或观察单个组件,而不是控制它们相互作用的动态;(2)经验数据不足以提供统计表示的系统。国家领导层所期望的新任务和能力要求增加BMDS元素及其子系统之间的相互作用。新的能力和任务线程包括远程发射和远程交战能力,以及一个强大的导弹防御系统,能够防御威胁袭击、碎片和诱饵。这些新的能力和任务线程可能需要修改杀伤链和指挥控制结构,以及改进的协调和性能。这些能力必须通过对记录程序的修改和跨系统元素的集成来实现,这些元素具有它们自己独立的规划动力。一个强大的导弹防御系统必须通过分层防御来实现。能力的变化需要分析标准导弹(SM-3)、SPY和BMDS要素之间复杂的相互依赖关系,如爱国者、末端高空区域防御系统、宙斯盾岸基导弹防御系统等。需要系统(称为“元素”)之间的协同作用来迎接新的挑战,这可以通过系统工程的系统来完成。系统之间相互作用的定义和测试对于通过分析元素之间的数据传输来提供态势感知至关重要。ABMs是一种工具,可以对复杂BMDS的这些相互作用进行定性评估。本文提出了一种基于智能体的建模方法,用于探索系统相互关系和评估BMDS杀伤链的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Naval Engineers Journal
Naval Engineers Journal 工程技术-工程:海洋
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Author's Response Author's Response Author's Response PRESIDENT'S PAGE THE FRANK G. LAW AWARD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1