Bioequivalence of Alprazolam Sublingual Tablet Formulation and Alprazolam Immediate Release Tablet in Healthy Volunteers

B. Damle, S. Tarabar, U. Kuruganti, P. Crownover, R. Labadie
{"title":"Bioequivalence of Alprazolam Sublingual Tablet Formulation and Alprazolam Immediate Release Tablet in Healthy Volunteers","authors":"B. Damle, S. Tarabar, U. Kuruganti, P. Crownover, R. Labadie","doi":"10.4172/JBB.1000150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alprazolam immediate release (IR) tablets are currently approved for the management of anxiety disorder or the short-term relief of symptoms of anxiety. A sublingual (SL) formulation of alprazolam, which disintegrates in the mouth without the need for additional fluids, has been developed. The aim of this study was to determine if the alprazolam SL 1 mg tablet was bioequivalent to the alprazolam IR 1 mg tablet in healthy volunteers. In this randomized, open label, two-way crossover, single dose study, subjects were randomized to receive a single alprazolam 1 mg IR tablet during one dosing period and a single 1 mg SL tablet during the other dosing period. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration AUC (0-t) and maximum plasma concentration (C max ). Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of adjusted geometric means for both AUC (0-t) and C max were wholly within 80%-125%. Participants were mostly male (27/28 [96.4%]) and had a mean (standard deviation) age of 35.9 (8.2) years. For the alprazolam 1 mg SL tablet relative to the alprazolam 1 mg IR tablet, the ratio of adjusted geometric means (90% CI) for AUC (0-t) and C max were 95.43% (91.74%, 99.27%) and 88.27% (83.68%, 93.11%), respectively. The incidence of AEs was similar during both treatment periods: 24 participants reported 39 AEs during the alprazolam 1 mg IR treatment period, and 23 participants reported 38 AEs during the alprazolam 1 mg SL treatment period. Bioequivalence was demonstrated between the alprazolam IR and SL 1 mg tablets, suggesting that the clinical performance of the SL tablet will be similar to that of the IR tablet.","PeriodicalId":15184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability","volume":"11 1","pages":"0-0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/JBB.1000150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Alprazolam immediate release (IR) tablets are currently approved for the management of anxiety disorder or the short-term relief of symptoms of anxiety. A sublingual (SL) formulation of alprazolam, which disintegrates in the mouth without the need for additional fluids, has been developed. The aim of this study was to determine if the alprazolam SL 1 mg tablet was bioequivalent to the alprazolam IR 1 mg tablet in healthy volunteers. In this randomized, open label, two-way crossover, single dose study, subjects were randomized to receive a single alprazolam 1 mg IR tablet during one dosing period and a single 1 mg SL tablet during the other dosing period. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration AUC (0-t) and maximum plasma concentration (C max ). Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of adjusted geometric means for both AUC (0-t) and C max were wholly within 80%-125%. Participants were mostly male (27/28 [96.4%]) and had a mean (standard deviation) age of 35.9 (8.2) years. For the alprazolam 1 mg SL tablet relative to the alprazolam 1 mg IR tablet, the ratio of adjusted geometric means (90% CI) for AUC (0-t) and C max were 95.43% (91.74%, 99.27%) and 88.27% (83.68%, 93.11%), respectively. The incidence of AEs was similar during both treatment periods: 24 participants reported 39 AEs during the alprazolam 1 mg IR treatment period, and 23 participants reported 38 AEs during the alprazolam 1 mg SL treatment period. Bioequivalence was demonstrated between the alprazolam IR and SL 1 mg tablets, suggesting that the clinical performance of the SL tablet will be similar to that of the IR tablet.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿普唑仑舌下片制剂与阿普唑仑速释片在健康人体的生物等效性
阿普唑仑即刻释放(IR)片剂目前被批准用于治疗焦虑障碍或短期缓解焦虑症状。阿普唑仑的舌下(SL)制剂,它在口腔中分解,而不需要额外的液体,已经开发。本研究的目的是确定阿普唑仑SL 1mg片是否与阿普唑仑IR 1mg片在健康志愿者中具有生物等效性。在这项随机、开放标签、双向交叉、单剂量的研究中,受试者在一个给药期随机接受单片阿普唑仑1mg IR片,在另一个给药期随机接受单片1mg SL片。主要药代动力学终点为从时间0到最后可量化浓度AUC (0-t)和最大血浆浓度(cmax)的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积。在整个研究过程中监测不良事件(ae)。如果AUC (0-t)和cmax校正几何平均值比值的90%置信区间(CI)均在80%-125%之间,则判定生物等效性。参与者多为男性(27/28[96.4%]),平均(标准差)年龄为35.9(8.2)岁。阿普唑仑1 mg SL片与阿普唑仑1 mg IR片的AUC (0-t)和C max的校正几何平均(90% CI)比值分别为95.43%(91.74%,99.27%)和88.27%(83.68%,93.11%)。在两个治疗期间,不良事件的发生率相似:24名参与者在阿普唑仑1mg IR治疗期间报告了39例不良事件,23名参与者在阿普唑仑1mg SL治疗期间报告了38例不良事件。阿普唑仑IR与SL 1 mg片剂之间存在生物等效性,提示SL片剂的临床性能与IR片剂相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future Outlook for Biosafety and Biotechnology Effect of Fatty Acids on Bioavailability Clinical Trials of COVID-19 in China Anticipation of Castor Industry and Bottle Scruff Deviation Range to Address Genuine Bioavailability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1