Toward a feminist psychological theory of “institutional trauma”

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Feminism & Psychology Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.1177/0959353520968374
Lucy Thompson
{"title":"Toward a feminist psychological theory of “institutional trauma”","authors":"Lucy Thompson","doi":"10.1177/0959353520968374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public discussions about trauma are circulating exponentially in the wake of global movements against structural violence, and efforts to mainstream “trauma-informed” approaches in mental health, human services, and organizational contexts. Within these discussions, the term “institutional trauma” is increasingly being deployed to make sense of structural violence and its impacts. However, such discussions typically reproduce highly individualistic understandings of trauma. Recent feminist advances in trauma theory articulate trauma as a distinctly socio-political form of distress, and critical feminist psychological work argues that gender and other institutions play a substantial role in defining and mediating experiences of trauma. However, the role of institutions in the (re)production of trauma remains under-theorized in the psychological literature. This paper applies feminist, critical mental health, and decolonial perspectives to identify the limitations of mainstream psychological perspectives on trauma and proposes a critical psychological theory of “institutional trauma”. I apply this critical analytic to argue that dominant biomedical and neoliberal frameworks fail to adequately account for the socio-political dimensions of trauma. I then consider institutional theory as a useful feminist psychological analytic through which to expand trauma theory and subvert pathologizing accounts of trauma as disordered and maladaptive.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"8 1","pages":"99 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminism & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353520968374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Public discussions about trauma are circulating exponentially in the wake of global movements against structural violence, and efforts to mainstream “trauma-informed” approaches in mental health, human services, and organizational contexts. Within these discussions, the term “institutional trauma” is increasingly being deployed to make sense of structural violence and its impacts. However, such discussions typically reproduce highly individualistic understandings of trauma. Recent feminist advances in trauma theory articulate trauma as a distinctly socio-political form of distress, and critical feminist psychological work argues that gender and other institutions play a substantial role in defining and mediating experiences of trauma. However, the role of institutions in the (re)production of trauma remains under-theorized in the psychological literature. This paper applies feminist, critical mental health, and decolonial perspectives to identify the limitations of mainstream psychological perspectives on trauma and proposes a critical psychological theory of “institutional trauma”. I apply this critical analytic to argue that dominant biomedical and neoliberal frameworks fail to adequately account for the socio-political dimensions of trauma. I then consider institutional theory as a useful feminist psychological analytic through which to expand trauma theory and subvert pathologizing accounts of trauma as disordered and maladaptive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“制度创伤”的女性主义心理学理论探讨
随着反对结构性暴力的全球运动,以及在精神卫生、人类服务和组织环境中将"了解创伤"方法纳入主流的努力,公众对创伤的讨论呈指数级增长。在这些讨论中,“制度性创伤”一词越来越多地被用来解释结构性暴力及其影响。然而,这样的讨论典型地再现了对创伤的高度个人主义的理解。最近女性主义在创伤理论方面的进展明确地将创伤作为一种独特的社会政治形式的痛苦,批判的女性主义心理学工作认为,性别和其他制度在定义和调解创伤经历方面发挥了重要作用。然而,在心理文献中,制度在创伤(再)生产中的作用仍然没有理论化。本文运用女性主义、批判心理健康和非殖民化的观点来识别主流心理创伤观点的局限性,并提出了“制度创伤”的批判心理学理论。我运用这种批判性分析来论证,占主导地位的生物医学和新自由主义框架未能充分解释创伤的社会政治层面。然后,我认为制度理论是一种有用的女权主义心理分析,通过它来扩展创伤理论,并颠覆将创伤作为无序和适应不良的病态化描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Feminism & Psychology provides a forum for debate at the interface between feminism and psychology. The journal"s principal aim is to foster the development of feminist theory and practice in – and beyond – psychology. It publishes high-quality original research, theoretical articles, and commentaries. We are interested in pieces that provide insights into the gendered reality of everyday lives, especially in relation to women and girls, as well as pieces that address broader theoretical issues. Feminism & Psychology seeks to publish work from scholars, researchers, activists and practitioners at all stages of their careers who share a feminist analysis of the overlapping domains of gender and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Thanks to guest editors, manuscript reviewers, and student presentation reviewers Social work with young women in security emergencies: An autoethnography of epistemic resistance Porridge and misogyny: Rationalising inconspicuous misogyny in morning television shows Disability, trauma, and the place of affect in identity: Examining performativity in visual impairment rehabilitation Book Review: Lady sapiens: Breaking stereotypes about prehistoric women by Thomas Cirotteau, Jennifer Kerner, and Éric Pincas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1