Les rapports de l'Eglise et de l'Etat selon Hegel

F. Fischbach
{"title":"Les rapports de l'Eglise et de l'Etat selon Hegel","authors":"F. Fischbach","doi":"10.3406/CALIB.2005.1560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how Hegel, when discussing the relationships between the Church and the State, is led to reconsider a classical question of Political Philosophy - i.e. the theologico-political question. More precisely, there is one aspect of this theologico-political issue that has become central in Hegel and in the Hegelian school succeeding him. It is commonly known as the question of secularisation and can be phrased in the following manner : is it possible that, eventually, modern political principles could be theological principles — that is : pre-modern principles — in a secularised form ? The theme has been common enough ever since the publication in 1922 of Carl Shmitt’s Political Theology. According to him, the philosopher who first explicitly posited that the principles of the State were religious principles adapted to this world was none other than Hegel himself, particularly when he came to conceive of the State as \"the divine on earth\" and the power of the State as divine power on earth.","PeriodicalId":31138,"journal":{"name":"Anglophonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anglophonia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/CALIB.2005.1560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how Hegel, when discussing the relationships between the Church and the State, is led to reconsider a classical question of Political Philosophy - i.e. the theologico-political question. More precisely, there is one aspect of this theologico-political issue that has become central in Hegel and in the Hegelian school succeeding him. It is commonly known as the question of secularisation and can be phrased in the following manner : is it possible that, eventually, modern political principles could be theological principles — that is : pre-modern principles — in a secularised form ? The theme has been common enough ever since the publication in 1922 of Carl Shmitt’s Political Theology. According to him, the philosopher who first explicitly posited that the principles of the State were religious principles adapted to this world was none other than Hegel himself, particularly when he came to conceive of the State as "the divine on earth" and the power of the State as divine power on earth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑格尔认为教会与国家的关系
本文的目的是证明黑格尔在讨论教会与国家之间的关系时,是如何重新考虑政治哲学的一个经典问题的——即神学-政治问题。更准确地说,这个神学政治问题的一个方面,已经成为黑格尔和他之后的黑格尔学派的核心。它通常被称为世俗化问题,可以用以下方式表达:最终,现代政治原则是否可能是神学原则——也就是说,前现代原则——以世俗化的形式?自从1922年卡尔·施米特(Carl Shmitt)的《政治神学》(Political Theology)出版以来,这个主题一直很普遍。在他看来,第一个明确提出国家原则是适应这个世界的宗教原则的哲学家不是别人,正是黑格尔自己,特别是当他开始把国家想象成“地球上的神”,把国家的权力想象成地球上的神的权力时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Opposing English, Contesting Capitalism: Pearse’s and Connolly’s discourses on the “Necessity for De-Anglicising Ireland” in the Early 20th Usages de l’anglais dans les intitulés de postes d'un corpus francophone. Analyse discursive outillée d’un corpus d’annonces d’emploi en ligne “Diversity’s good unless you have a Southern accent, then you’re a hick”: Self-evaluation, linguistic insecurity and symbolic domination in Middle Tennessee Introduction: English(es) as a social practice Terminologie militante et changement social : le cas du terme femicide dans le discours de l’ONU sur la violence envers les femmes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1