Reporting practices in situations of conflicting institutional logics: the case of a German federal authority

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change Pub Date : 2021-05-05 DOI:10.1108/JAOC-02-2020-0020
Celina Gisch, Bernhard Hirsch, David Lindermüller
{"title":"Reporting practices in situations of conflicting institutional logics: the case of a German federal authority","authors":"Celina Gisch, Bernhard Hirsch, David Lindermüller","doi":"10.1108/JAOC-02-2020-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to understand how reporting practices act as drivers of change in situations of conflicting institutional logics in a public sector organisation.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe findings are based on a case study of a German federal authority, where management accounting reports were introduced as part of a “new” managerial logic of control.\n\n\nFindings\nIn the case organisation, management accounting reports were intended to change the behaviour of executives but were still guided by an “old” logic of justification. Nevertheless, over time, the addressees of the reports used the reports and reconciled different logics. This documents a process from decoupling to compromising and, finally, reconciling different institutional logics.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBy examining the practices of management accounting reporting, this study elaborates the tensions placed on individuals by conflicting institutional logics and provides insights into how organisational practices are used to handle and reconcile conflicting logics in a public sector organisation. Therefore, this paper contributes to the discussion on how organisational practices act as drivers of organisational change.\n","PeriodicalId":46141,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-02-2020-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to understand how reporting practices act as drivers of change in situations of conflicting institutional logics in a public sector organisation. Design/methodology/approach The findings are based on a case study of a German federal authority, where management accounting reports were introduced as part of a “new” managerial logic of control. Findings In the case organisation, management accounting reports were intended to change the behaviour of executives but were still guided by an “old” logic of justification. Nevertheless, over time, the addressees of the reports used the reports and reconciled different logics. This documents a process from decoupling to compromising and, finally, reconciling different institutional logics. Originality/value By examining the practices of management accounting reporting, this study elaborates the tensions placed on individuals by conflicting institutional logics and provides insights into how organisational practices are used to handle and reconcile conflicting logics in a public sector organisation. Therefore, this paper contributes to the discussion on how organisational practices act as drivers of organisational change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度逻辑冲突情况下的报告实践:以德国联邦当局为例
本研究旨在了解报告实践如何在公共部门组织中冲突制度逻辑的情况下作为变革的驱动因素。设计/方法/方法研究结果基于对德国联邦当局的案例研究,该机构将管理会计报告作为“新”管理控制逻辑的一部分引入。在案例组织中,管理会计报告旨在改变高管的行为,但仍然受到“旧的”辩护逻辑的指导。然而,随着时间的推移,报告的收件人使用报告并协调不同的逻辑。这记录了一个从脱钩到妥协,最后调和不同制度逻辑的过程。原创性/价值通过检查管理会计报告的实践,本研究阐述了冲突的制度逻辑对个人施加的紧张关系,并提供了如何在公共部门组织中使用组织实践来处理和调和冲突逻辑的见解。因此,本文有助于讨论组织实践如何作为组织变革的驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The main objective of the journal is to provide a platform for researchers and practitioners from multiple disciplines to disseminate information on organizational and accounting systems change. To achieve this, the journal will be directed at mapping out contemporary changes in the new global business environment. It will seek to explain the new techniques, processes, and philosophies associated with the rise of strategy-oriented accounting and information systems.
期刊最新文献
Show me? Inspire me? Make me? An institutional theory exploration of social and environmental reporting practices Toward an epistemology for anarchist accounting and stakeholder relationship capability: evidence from Iran Does the Directive of the European Union on disclosure of non-financial and diversity information improve reporting? Corporate reporting on the Sustainable Development Goals: a structured literature review and research agenda Value for money (VFM) in private finance initiative (PFI) implementation in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1