PRODUCTION OF WOOD ENERGY BY CHIPPING

D. Marčeta, V. Petković, Gordana Globočki Lakić
{"title":"PRODUCTION OF WOOD ENERGY BY CHIPPING","authors":"D. Marčeta, V. Petković, Gordana Globočki Lakić","doi":"10.7251/comen1902159m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing demand for using renewable energy resources is strongly emphasized during the last decades. On the international level it is recognized through a series of conventions, conclusions and recommendations. Forests are energy source through conversion of wood biomass into solid, fluent and gaseous fuels for industrial and household use. Wood chips is a form of biomass, size of 5-50 mm, which is obtained by chipping of lower quality logs, trees, brushwood and wood residues. Some investigation showed that choosing the right chipper is crucial in a projection of chipping system. In this study, chipping at the landing site was compared with the Jenz HEM 700 and Pezzolato PTH 1300/1500 chippers. The subject of chipping was beech long fuelwood and stacked fuelwood. The investigation was done with the time and work-study method. Cost calculation was performed according to FAO methodology, slightly modified for local conditions. Also, in simulations, Jenz HEM 561 DQ was included in order to cover a wider range of chippers by the capacity, but data for this chipper were undertaken from other research. Unit costs of chipping were calculated on the basis of raw material input and chipper output. Unit costs were expressed for factory projected chippers productivity also, in order to compare obtained unit costs with costs when chippers are working below full capacity. Results of the productivity and cost calculation of chippers showed that bigger chippers had lower unit costs, but because of inability to achieve full capacity at the forest landing site and because of their dimensions which hinder the manipulation, it can be recommended using of chippers of smaller capacity like Jenz HEM 561 DQ or even smaller.","PeriodicalId":10617,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Materials","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7251/comen1902159m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing demand for using renewable energy resources is strongly emphasized during the last decades. On the international level it is recognized through a series of conventions, conclusions and recommendations. Forests are energy source through conversion of wood biomass into solid, fluent and gaseous fuels for industrial and household use. Wood chips is a form of biomass, size of 5-50 mm, which is obtained by chipping of lower quality logs, trees, brushwood and wood residues. Some investigation showed that choosing the right chipper is crucial in a projection of chipping system. In this study, chipping at the landing site was compared with the Jenz HEM 700 and Pezzolato PTH 1300/1500 chippers. The subject of chipping was beech long fuelwood and stacked fuelwood. The investigation was done with the time and work-study method. Cost calculation was performed according to FAO methodology, slightly modified for local conditions. Also, in simulations, Jenz HEM 561 DQ was included in order to cover a wider range of chippers by the capacity, but data for this chipper were undertaken from other research. Unit costs of chipping were calculated on the basis of raw material input and chipper output. Unit costs were expressed for factory projected chippers productivity also, in order to compare obtained unit costs with costs when chippers are working below full capacity. Results of the productivity and cost calculation of chippers showed that bigger chippers had lower unit costs, but because of inability to achieve full capacity at the forest landing site and because of their dimensions which hinder the manipulation, it can be recommended using of chippers of smaller capacity like Jenz HEM 561 DQ or even smaller.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过削木生产木材能量
在过去的几十年里,人们强烈强调使用可再生能源的需求日益增加。在国际一级,它通过一系列公约、结论和建议得到承认。森林通过将木材生物质转化为供工业和家庭使用的固体、流动和气体燃料而成为能源来源。木屑是生物质的一种形式,大小为5-50毫米,通过切碎低质量的原木、树木、灌木和木材残留物获得。一些调查表明,在一个芯片系统的投影中,选择合适的芯片至关重要。在本研究中,着陆点的切屑与Jenz HEM 700和Pezzolato PTH 1300/1500切屑机进行了比较。削片的主题是山毛榉长薪材和叠薪材。调查采用时间和勤工俭学的方法进行。费用计算是根据粮农组织的方法进行的,并根据当地情况稍作修改。此外,在模拟中,为了覆盖更广泛的芯片容量,包括Jenz HEM 561 DQ,但该芯片的数据是从其他研究中进行的。切屑单位成本是根据原料投入和切屑产量计算的。单位成本也表示了工厂预计的削片机生产率,以便将获得的单位成本与削片机低于满负荷工作时的成本进行比较。切屑机的生产率和成本计算结果表明,较大的切屑机单位成本较低,但由于在森林着落点无法达到满负荷,且由于其尺寸的限制,影响操作,建议使用Jenz HEM 561 DQ等较小容量的切屑机,甚至更小的切屑机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LABORATORY TESTING OF UNSTIMULATED AND STIMULATED SALIVA BUFFERING CAPACITY IN PATIENT AND CONTROL GROUPS AFTER TITRATION WITH HCl AND NaOH NEURAL NETWORKS FOR SOLVING HUXLEY’S EQUATION USE OF 3D-BIOPRINTING IN TISSUE ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD PRODUCTION DETERMINATION OF IRON CONTENT IN NATURAL MINERAL WATER: COMPARISON OF ICP-OES AND SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD INFLUENCE OF GEOLOGICAL PARAMETERS ON THE INDOOR RADON CONCENTRATION IN THE CITY OF TREBINJE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1