{"title":"PRODUCTION OF WOOD ENERGY BY CHIPPING","authors":"D. Marčeta, V. Petković, Gordana Globočki Lakić","doi":"10.7251/comen1902159m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing demand for using renewable energy resources is strongly emphasized during the last decades. On the international level it is recognized through a series of conventions, conclusions and recommendations. Forests are energy source through conversion of wood biomass into solid, fluent and gaseous fuels for industrial and household use. Wood chips is a form of biomass, size of 5-50 mm, which is obtained by chipping of lower quality logs, trees, brushwood and wood residues. Some investigation showed that choosing the right chipper is crucial in a projection of chipping system. In this study, chipping at the landing site was compared with the Jenz HEM 700 and Pezzolato PTH 1300/1500 chippers. The subject of chipping was beech long fuelwood and stacked fuelwood. The investigation was done with the time and work-study method. Cost calculation was performed according to FAO methodology, slightly modified for local conditions. Also, in simulations, Jenz HEM 561 DQ was included in order to cover a wider range of chippers by the capacity, but data for this chipper were undertaken from other research. Unit costs of chipping were calculated on the basis of raw material input and chipper output. Unit costs were expressed for factory projected chippers productivity also, in order to compare obtained unit costs with costs when chippers are working below full capacity. Results of the productivity and cost calculation of chippers showed that bigger chippers had lower unit costs, but because of inability to achieve full capacity at the forest landing site and because of their dimensions which hinder the manipulation, it can be recommended using of chippers of smaller capacity like Jenz HEM 561 DQ or even smaller.","PeriodicalId":10617,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Materials","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7251/comen1902159m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Increasing demand for using renewable energy resources is strongly emphasized during the last decades. On the international level it is recognized through a series of conventions, conclusions and recommendations. Forests are energy source through conversion of wood biomass into solid, fluent and gaseous fuels for industrial and household use. Wood chips is a form of biomass, size of 5-50 mm, which is obtained by chipping of lower quality logs, trees, brushwood and wood residues. Some investigation showed that choosing the right chipper is crucial in a projection of chipping system. In this study, chipping at the landing site was compared with the Jenz HEM 700 and Pezzolato PTH 1300/1500 chippers. The subject of chipping was beech long fuelwood and stacked fuelwood. The investigation was done with the time and work-study method. Cost calculation was performed according to FAO methodology, slightly modified for local conditions. Also, in simulations, Jenz HEM 561 DQ was included in order to cover a wider range of chippers by the capacity, but data for this chipper were undertaken from other research. Unit costs of chipping were calculated on the basis of raw material input and chipper output. Unit costs were expressed for factory projected chippers productivity also, in order to compare obtained unit costs with costs when chippers are working below full capacity. Results of the productivity and cost calculation of chippers showed that bigger chippers had lower unit costs, but because of inability to achieve full capacity at the forest landing site and because of their dimensions which hinder the manipulation, it can be recommended using of chippers of smaller capacity like Jenz HEM 561 DQ or even smaller.
在过去的几十年里,人们强烈强调使用可再生能源的需求日益增加。在国际一级,它通过一系列公约、结论和建议得到承认。森林通过将木材生物质转化为供工业和家庭使用的固体、流动和气体燃料而成为能源来源。木屑是生物质的一种形式,大小为5-50毫米,通过切碎低质量的原木、树木、灌木和木材残留物获得。一些调查表明,在一个芯片系统的投影中,选择合适的芯片至关重要。在本研究中,着陆点的切屑与Jenz HEM 700和Pezzolato PTH 1300/1500切屑机进行了比较。削片的主题是山毛榉长薪材和叠薪材。调查采用时间和勤工俭学的方法进行。费用计算是根据粮农组织的方法进行的,并根据当地情况稍作修改。此外,在模拟中,为了覆盖更广泛的芯片容量,包括Jenz HEM 561 DQ,但该芯片的数据是从其他研究中进行的。切屑单位成本是根据原料投入和切屑产量计算的。单位成本也表示了工厂预计的削片机生产率,以便将获得的单位成本与削片机低于满负荷工作时的成本进行比较。切屑机的生产率和成本计算结果表明,较大的切屑机单位成本较低,但由于在森林着落点无法达到满负荷,且由于其尺寸的限制,影响操作,建议使用Jenz HEM 561 DQ等较小容量的切屑机,甚至更小的切屑机。