Probabilistic Modular Tool to Assess Leak Before Break in Pipes

F. Brigante, C. Versteylen, F. H. E. de Haan – de Wilde
{"title":"Probabilistic Modular Tool to Assess Leak Before Break in Pipes","authors":"F. Brigante, C. Versteylen, F. H. E. de Haan – de Wilde","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-84226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents the probabilistic study for Leak Before Break (LBB) assessments. The research has been carried out with an in-house developed software that allows to perform both probabilistic and deterministic leak before break analyses for pressurized pipes. The study is based on the UK procedure for the assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects (R6). The procedure applied is the Detectable Leak Before Break (DLBB) that relies on the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Option 1 assessment procedure. The calculations merge the plastic collapse assessment and the brittle failure mode of the pipe in the FAD. The first computed parameter for the LBB assessment is the Critical Crack Length (CCL) distribution density of the postulated through wall defect. The structural integrity assessment is then coupled with the Henry-Fauske two-phase critical flow model for the evaluation of the Leakage Rate (LR). With this coupling the Minimum Detectable Crack Length (MDCL) distribution density is calculated. This step sets the boundary conditions for the fracture mechanics assessment of the postulated defect. The main probabilistic outputs from the assessment are the probability of the structural failure and the probability that the defect does not leak a detectable amount of coolant. The probabilistic method used is the Latin Hypercube Sampling; the Monte Carlo method is applied for verification. These results are then compared with the deterministic output from the LBB procedure.","PeriodicalId":23700,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Computer Technology and Bolted Joints; Design and Analysis","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Computer Technology and Bolted Joints; Design and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-84226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the probabilistic study for Leak Before Break (LBB) assessments. The research has been carried out with an in-house developed software that allows to perform both probabilistic and deterministic leak before break analyses for pressurized pipes. The study is based on the UK procedure for the assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects (R6). The procedure applied is the Detectable Leak Before Break (DLBB) that relies on the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Option 1 assessment procedure. The calculations merge the plastic collapse assessment and the brittle failure mode of the pipe in the FAD. The first computed parameter for the LBB assessment is the Critical Crack Length (CCL) distribution density of the postulated through wall defect. The structural integrity assessment is then coupled with the Henry-Fauske two-phase critical flow model for the evaluation of the Leakage Rate (LR). With this coupling the Minimum Detectable Crack Length (MDCL) distribution density is calculated. This step sets the boundary conditions for the fracture mechanics assessment of the postulated defect. The main probabilistic outputs from the assessment are the probability of the structural failure and the probability that the defect does not leak a detectable amount of coolant. The probabilistic method used is the Latin Hypercube Sampling; the Monte Carlo method is applied for verification. These results are then compared with the deterministic output from the LBB procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在管道破裂前评估泄漏的概率模块化工具
本文研究了先漏后破(LBB)评估的概率问题。该研究是通过内部开发的软件进行的,该软件可以对加压管道进行概率泄漏和确定性泄漏分析。该研究是基于英国程序的完整性评估结构含有缺陷(R6)。应用的程序是破裂前可检测泄漏(DLBB),它依赖于故障评估图(FAD)选项1评估程序。该计算将塑性破坏评估和管道脆性破坏模式结合在一起。LBB评估的第一个计算参数是假设穿壁缺陷的临界裂纹长度(CCL)分布密度。然后将结构完整性评估与Henry-Fauske两相临界流模型相结合,以评估泄漏率(LR)。利用这种耦合计算了最小可探测裂纹长度(MDCL)分布密度。这一步为假定缺陷的断裂力学评估设定边界条件。评估的主要概率输出是结构失效的概率和缺陷没有泄漏可检测数量的冷却剂的概率。使用的概率方法是拉丁超立方采样;采用蒙特卡罗方法进行验证。然后将这些结果与LBB过程的确定性输出进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High-Temperature Design of 700°C Heat Exchanger in a Large Scale High-Temperature Thermal Energy Storage Performance Test Facility On the Effect of Hot-Box Size on Coke Drum Skirt Fatigue Life Numerical Approaches for Bolt Interactions in Flange Gasket Assemblies Experimental Investigation on the Fatigue Strength for Different Tightening Procedures and Materials in Metric Screws Study on Post-Buckling Behaviors of Lower Heads for Fracture Control of Reactor Vessels Under BDBE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1