The sound of the future: listening as data and the politics of soundscape assessment

IF 0.4 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Sound Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-03 DOI:10.1080/20551940.2020.1863121
Milena Droumeva
{"title":"The sound of the future: listening as data and the politics of soundscape assessment","authors":"Milena Droumeva","doi":"10.1080/20551940.2020.1863121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This sonic ecology of cities has been highlighted recently by the effects of the global pandemic: fewer cars and people on the road are letting quieter layers of the soundscape to come forward, signalling unequivocally that the urban soundscape is a direct result of anthropocenic activity. This is a time, then, to listen and reflect, and perhaps heed new models for thinking of urban sound. One barrier to such a process is the persistent and entrenched disconnect between soundscape literature, public engagement with sound, and urban planning. By critically surveying literature on soundscape assessment as it intersects with cultural sound studies and acoustic ecology, this paper traces a number of important disciplinary ontologies of everyday listening in cities, ranging from attempts to standardise evaluation metrics and classification of soundscapes, to the emergence of subjective listening studies. More recently a ‘digital commons’ approach to civic engagement has led to crowdsourcing sonic experiences, soundmapping, and, at the infrastructural level – networked monitoring of noise levels. These rhetorical and practical developments fit within important contemporary conversations in critical data and algorithm studies and as such require a critical excavation of underlying values and conceptions of listening.","PeriodicalId":53207,"journal":{"name":"Sound Studies","volume":"50 1","pages":"225 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sound Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20551940.2020.1863121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This sonic ecology of cities has been highlighted recently by the effects of the global pandemic: fewer cars and people on the road are letting quieter layers of the soundscape to come forward, signalling unequivocally that the urban soundscape is a direct result of anthropocenic activity. This is a time, then, to listen and reflect, and perhaps heed new models for thinking of urban sound. One barrier to such a process is the persistent and entrenched disconnect between soundscape literature, public engagement with sound, and urban planning. By critically surveying literature on soundscape assessment as it intersects with cultural sound studies and acoustic ecology, this paper traces a number of important disciplinary ontologies of everyday listening in cities, ranging from attempts to standardise evaluation metrics and classification of soundscapes, to the emergence of subjective listening studies. More recently a ‘digital commons’ approach to civic engagement has led to crowdsourcing sonic experiences, soundmapping, and, at the infrastructural level – networked monitoring of noise levels. These rhetorical and practical developments fit within important contemporary conversations in critical data and algorithm studies and as such require a critical excavation of underlying values and conceptions of listening.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未来之声:作为数据的聆听与声景评估的政治
最近,全球大流行的影响突显了城市的声音生态:道路上车辆和人的减少让更安静的声景层脱颖而出,明确表明城市声景是人类活动的直接结果。因此,这是一个倾听和反思的时刻,也许需要新的城市声音思考模式。这一过程的一个障碍是音景文学、公众对声音的参与和城市规划之间持续而根深蒂固的脱节。通过批判性地调查声景评估的文献,因为它与文化声音研究和声学生态学相交叉,本文追溯了城市日常听力的一些重要学科本体论,从标准化评估指标和声景分类的尝试,到主观听力研究的出现。最近,公民参与的“数字公地”方法导致了声音体验的众包、声音测绘,以及在基础设施层面上的噪音水平网络监测。这些修辞和实践的发展适合于关键数据和算法研究中的重要当代对话,因此需要对潜在价值和倾听概念进行批判性挖掘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sound Studies
Sound Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Buzzing like a bee: simulation and cross-species empathy in sound installations Castrato as cyborg: premodern posthumanism & the epistemology of voice Voice machines: the castrato, the cat piano, and other strange sounds , by Bonnie Gordon, Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 2023, 432 pp., $55.00 (cloth), ISBN 9780226825144 Connective listening practices and technologies Quantum Listening , by Pauline Oliveros, London, Ignota, 2022, 70 pp., $8.99 (pb), ISBN 9781838003944 Machine aurality: uncanny resonances and the sonic anxieties of surveillance capitalism Listening beyond the cochlear Of sound mind , by Nina Kraus, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 2022, 359 pp., $19.95 (paperback), ISBN 9780262545075
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1