The Comparison between Standardized Mortality Ratio, Poisson-Gamma and Stochastic Sic Model for Pneumonia Disease Mapping in Malaysia

Ijlal Mohd Diah, Nazrina Aziz
{"title":"The Comparison between Standardized Mortality Ratio, Poisson-Gamma and Stochastic Sic Model for Pneumonia Disease Mapping in Malaysia","authors":"Ijlal Mohd Diah, Nazrina Aziz","doi":"10.32890/jict2022.21.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pneumonia is one of the primary causes of death from infectious diseases. Traditionally, its spread has been tracked based on thetotal number of cases reported, with no concern for geographical distribution. Disease mapping is among the ways public health andthe government can monitor diseases as a preventative strategy. Clear pictures of the risk areas can be seen using this method. Relative risk estimation is a significant part of disease mapping that needs to be considered when studying disease occurrence. This paper aimed to estimate the relative risk values for pneumonia based on three models and compare the results. The approaches used in this study were Standardized Morbidity Ratio (SMR), Poisson-gamma, and discrete time-space stochastic Susceptible-Infected-Carriers (SIC) models, which were applied in estimating the relative risk values. Results showed that Kuala Lumpur was classified as a very low-risk area for pneumonia incidence when using the SMR and Poisson-gamma models. In contrast, Selangor was identified as a very low-risk area when using the discrete time-space stochastic SIC model. Putrajaya was categorised as a very high-risk area in the results of all three types of methods. In conclusion, this stochastic SIC model demonstrated better performance than the conventional models.","PeriodicalId":39396,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information and Communication Technology","volume":"136 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information and Communication Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2022.21.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pneumonia is one of the primary causes of death from infectious diseases. Traditionally, its spread has been tracked based on thetotal number of cases reported, with no concern for geographical distribution. Disease mapping is among the ways public health andthe government can monitor diseases as a preventative strategy. Clear pictures of the risk areas can be seen using this method. Relative risk estimation is a significant part of disease mapping that needs to be considered when studying disease occurrence. This paper aimed to estimate the relative risk values for pneumonia based on three models and compare the results. The approaches used in this study were Standardized Morbidity Ratio (SMR), Poisson-gamma, and discrete time-space stochastic Susceptible-Infected-Carriers (SIC) models, which were applied in estimating the relative risk values. Results showed that Kuala Lumpur was classified as a very low-risk area for pneumonia incidence when using the SMR and Poisson-gamma models. In contrast, Selangor was identified as a very low-risk area when using the discrete time-space stochastic SIC model. Putrajaya was categorised as a very high-risk area in the results of all three types of methods. In conclusion, this stochastic SIC model demonstrated better performance than the conventional models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准化死亡率、泊松-伽玛和随机Sic模型在马来西亚肺炎疾病制图中的比较
肺炎是传染病导致死亡的主要原因之一。传统上,它的传播是根据报告的病例总数来跟踪的,而不关心地理分布。疾病地图是公共卫生和政府监测疾病的一种预防策略。使用这种方法可以看到风险区域的清晰图片。相对风险估计是疾病制图的重要组成部分,是研究疾病发生时需要考虑的问题。本文旨在基于三种模型估计肺炎的相对风险值,并对结果进行比较。本研究中使用的方法是标准化发病率(SMR)、泊松- γ和离散时空随机易感感染携带者(SIC)模型,这些模型用于估计相对风险值。结果显示,当使用SMR和泊松-伽马模型时,吉隆坡被归类为肺炎发病率非常低的地区。相比之下,当使用离散时空随机SIC模型时,雪兰莪被确定为非常低风险的地区。在所有三种方法的结果中,布城被归类为非常高风险的地区。综上所述,该随机SIC模型比传统模型具有更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: IJICT is a refereed journal in the field of information and communication technology (ICT), providing an international forum for professionals, engineers and researchers. IJICT reports the new paradigms in this emerging field of technology and envisions the future developments in the frontier areas. The journal addresses issues for the vertical and horizontal applications in this area. Topics covered include: -Information theory/coding- Information/IT/network security, standards, applications- Internet/web based systems/products- Data mining/warehousing- Network planning, design, administration- Sensor/ad hoc networks- Human-computer intelligent interaction, AI- Computational linguistics, digital speech- Distributed/cooperative media- Interactive communication media/content- Social interaction, mobile communications- Signal representation/processing, image processing- Virtual reality, cyber law, e-governance- Microprocessor interfacing, hardware design- Control of industrial processes, ERP/CRM/SCM
期刊最新文献
A Huffman based short message service compression technique using adjacent distance array Machine Learning Models for Behavioural Diversity of Asian Elephants Prediction Using Satellite Collar Data Visually Impaired Usability Requirements for Accessible Mobile Applications: A Checklist for Mobile E-book Applications Dengue Outbreak Detection Model Using Artificial Immune System: A Malaysian Case Study Modelling and Forecasting the Trend in Cryptocurrency Prices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1