Short-term outcome of Laparoscopic Appendicectomy and Open Appendicectomy in acute appendicitis- a comparative study

Mashfique Ahmed Bhuiyan, M. A. Bashar, A. Rahman, Md Aminul Islam, Kazi Majharul Lslam, M. Murshed, A. Alam
{"title":"Short-term outcome of Laparoscopic Appendicectomy and Open Appendicectomy in acute appendicitis- a comparative study","authors":"Mashfique Ahmed Bhuiyan, M. A. Bashar, A. Rahman, Md Aminul Islam, Kazi Majharul Lslam, M. Murshed, A. Alam","doi":"10.3329/jss.v21i2.43899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Appendectomy, though being performed by both open and laparoscopic methods, there is a lack of consensus regarding which is the most appropriate method. This study will document important variables and parameters to compare therapeutic benefit of laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA) and open Appendectomy (OA). Objective: The study aimed at comparing the short- term outcome of laparoscopic Appendectomy and open appendectomy in cases of acute appendicitis, in terms of postoperative pain and complications, hospital stay, recovery and return to normal activities. \nMethods: Whenever there was clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis, the patient was admitted to hospital, relevant history was recorded and clinical examination was conducted, necessary laboratory and imaging studies were performed and patient satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria was included in the study. The Appendectomy procedure was attended by the investigator and all relevant perioperative data were recorded. \nResults: Post-operative pain was mostly mild in LA group (40%), while in OA, it was mostly severe (38%) and moderate (34%). Postoperative complications were significantly higher in OA than in LA. Hospital stay was longer in OA (7.03 days) than LA (3.49 days). Early recovery and return to full normal activity was noted in LA (5.56 days) than in OA (11.26 days). Moreover, operative time was shorter in LA (56.37 min), than in OA (71.86 min). \nConclusion: Laparoscopic Appendectomy have clear advantages over open Appendectomy in respect to short term results. \nJournal of Surgical Sciences (2017) Vol. 21 (2): 70-75","PeriodicalId":33248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jss.v21i2.43899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Appendectomy, though being performed by both open and laparoscopic methods, there is a lack of consensus regarding which is the most appropriate method. This study will document important variables and parameters to compare therapeutic benefit of laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA) and open Appendectomy (OA). Objective: The study aimed at comparing the short- term outcome of laparoscopic Appendectomy and open appendectomy in cases of acute appendicitis, in terms of postoperative pain and complications, hospital stay, recovery and return to normal activities. Methods: Whenever there was clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis, the patient was admitted to hospital, relevant history was recorded and clinical examination was conducted, necessary laboratory and imaging studies were performed and patient satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria was included in the study. The Appendectomy procedure was attended by the investigator and all relevant perioperative data were recorded. Results: Post-operative pain was mostly mild in LA group (40%), while in OA, it was mostly severe (38%) and moderate (34%). Postoperative complications were significantly higher in OA than in LA. Hospital stay was longer in OA (7.03 days) than LA (3.49 days). Early recovery and return to full normal activity was noted in LA (5.56 days) than in OA (11.26 days). Moreover, operative time was shorter in LA (56.37 min), than in OA (71.86 min). Conclusion: Laparoscopic Appendectomy have clear advantages over open Appendectomy in respect to short term results. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2017) Vol. 21 (2): 70-75
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开放式阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的近期疗效比较研究
背景:阑尾切除术虽然采用开放和腹腔镜两种方法,但对于哪种方法最合适缺乏共识。本研究将记录重要的变量和参数来比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)和开放式阑尾切除术(OA)的治疗效果。目的:比较急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开放式阑尾切除术的近期疗效,包括术后疼痛和并发症、住院时间、恢复和恢复正常活动。方法:凡临床怀疑为急性阑尾炎的患者均入院,记录病史并进行临床检查,进行必要的实验室和影像学检查,并将符合纳入和排除标准的患者纳入研究。研究者参与了阑尾切除术,并记录了所有相关的围手术期数据。结果:LA组术后疼痛多为轻度(40%),OA组术后疼痛多为重度(38%)和中度(34%)。OA术后并发症明显高于LA。OA组住院时间(7.03 d)较LA组(3.49 d)长。LA患者(5.56天)比OA患者(11.26天)更早恢复并完全恢复正常活动。此外,LA的手术时间(56.37 min)短于OA (71.86 min)。结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术在短期效果上明显优于开放式阑尾切除术。外科杂志(2017)Vol. 21 (2): 70-75
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
3D PRINTING IN PEDIATRIC ORTHOPEDICS – THE NEW GENERATION OF PREOPERATIVE PLANNING IN THE FIELD OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPEDICS SPONTANEOUS RUPTURE OF DOUBLE J URETERAL STENT LARYNGEAL SYNOVIAL SARCOMA – A CASE REPORT EARLY OUTCOME OF PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY IN SEPTUAGENARIANS AND OCTOGENARIANS IN NEPAL The efficacy of serial physical examination in management of penetrating abdominal trauma to avoid negative laparotomy in selected cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1