Follow the breath: mindfulness as travelling pedagogy

IF 0.6 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES History of Education Review Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI:10.1108/her-05-2021-0015
R. Low
{"title":"Follow the breath: mindfulness as travelling pedagogy","authors":"R. Low","doi":"10.1108/her-05-2021-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis article considers the ethical and political significance of mindfulness by treating it as a pedagogy – that is, as a way of cultivating particular human capacities in response to a specific situation. It puts forward an approach for evaluating its implications not by recourse to a predetermined moral meter, but by locating it within specific historical and geographical contexts as mediated biographically by individual teachers.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on Edward Said's concept of “traveling theory”, this article proposes an approach called “travelling pedagogy” that sensitises the researcher to how the interplay of temporal, spatial, and biographical factors shape reiterations of any pedagogy. It then uses this conceptual framework to explore how mindfulness has been taught by three of its prominent proponents: Thich Nhat Hanh, Jon Kabat-Zinn, and bell hooks.FindingsThe exploration of how mindfulness has been taught by the three prominent teachers featured in this article demonstrates how its ethico-political implications transform under varied conditions of urgency faced by these teachers, respectively: war and militarisation; scientific legitimacy; racialised and gendered capitalism. This points to how a historical approach might add nuance to the discussions and debates on mindfulness beyond overgeneralised hype on the one hand, and sweeping “McMindfulness” critiques on the other.Originality/valueThis article proposes a new conceptual framework for evaluating the ethical and political significance of mindfulness – and indeed any form of pedagogy – by tracking it at the nexus of history, geography, and biography. By conceiving of mindfulness as a travelling pedagogy, it also counsels a more worldly consideration of its implications beyond beatific celebration and patrician contempt.","PeriodicalId":43049,"journal":{"name":"History of Education Review","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/her-05-2021-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis article considers the ethical and political significance of mindfulness by treating it as a pedagogy – that is, as a way of cultivating particular human capacities in response to a specific situation. It puts forward an approach for evaluating its implications not by recourse to a predetermined moral meter, but by locating it within specific historical and geographical contexts as mediated biographically by individual teachers.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on Edward Said's concept of “traveling theory”, this article proposes an approach called “travelling pedagogy” that sensitises the researcher to how the interplay of temporal, spatial, and biographical factors shape reiterations of any pedagogy. It then uses this conceptual framework to explore how mindfulness has been taught by three of its prominent proponents: Thich Nhat Hanh, Jon Kabat-Zinn, and bell hooks.FindingsThe exploration of how mindfulness has been taught by the three prominent teachers featured in this article demonstrates how its ethico-political implications transform under varied conditions of urgency faced by these teachers, respectively: war and militarisation; scientific legitimacy; racialised and gendered capitalism. This points to how a historical approach might add nuance to the discussions and debates on mindfulness beyond overgeneralised hype on the one hand, and sweeping “McMindfulness” critiques on the other.Originality/valueThis article proposes a new conceptual framework for evaluating the ethical and political significance of mindfulness – and indeed any form of pedagogy – by tracking it at the nexus of history, geography, and biography. By conceiving of mindfulness as a travelling pedagogy, it also counsels a more worldly consideration of its implications beyond beatific celebration and patrician contempt.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跟随呼吸:正念作为旅行教学法
本文通过将正念视为一种教育学来考虑正念的伦理和政治意义——也就是说,作为一种培养特定人类能力以应对特定情况的方式。它提出了一种评估其含义的方法,不是通过求助于预先确定的道德标准,而是通过将其定位在特定的历史和地理背景中,由个别教师通过传记进行调解。设计/方法论/方法借鉴爱德华·赛义德的“旅行理论”概念,本文提出了一种叫做“旅行教学法”的方法,它使研究者对时间、空间和传记因素的相互作用如何影响任何教学法的重复产生敏感。然后,它使用这个概念框架来探索正念是如何被三位杰出的支持者教授的:一行禅师、乔恩·卡巴金和贝尔·胡克斯。本文对三位杰出教师如何教授正念的探索,展示了正念的伦理政治含义如何在这些教师分别面临的紧迫条件下发生变化:战争和军事化;科学的合法性;种族化和性别化资本主义。这表明,一方面,历史方法可能会为关于正念的讨论和辩论增加细微差别,而不仅仅是过度一般化的炒作,另一方面,是对“麦克正念”的全面批评。原创性/价值本文提出了一个新的概念框架,通过追踪历史、地理和传记的联系,来评估正念的伦理和政治意义——实际上是任何形式的教育学。通过将正念设想为一种旅行教育学,它还建议对其含义进行更世俗的考虑,而不是幸福的庆祝和贵族的蔑视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History of Education Review
History of Education Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The demise of school-developed elective courses in NSW: a case study in centralisation “A pleasant walk on the Pakihi”: ecological orientations in mid-century nature study Enchanting things: the scientific communication of Julius Sumner Miller The Endeavour scholarships program in the era of the Asian century: promise unfulfilled Changing policy, changing plans: responses to the end of fee-free education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1