Engaging the social: Community engaged pedagogy in the context of decolonization and transformation at the University of Cape Town

J. Chihota, G. Harding, Lance Louskieter, J. Mcmillan, S. Mkhonta, S. Oliver
{"title":"Engaging the social: Community engaged pedagogy in the context of decolonization and transformation at the University of Cape Town","authors":"J. Chihota, G. Harding, Lance Louskieter, J. Mcmillan, S. Mkhonta, S. Oliver","doi":"10.24908/ijesjp.v8i2.14395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, higher education is at a crossroads on so many levels: funding, course development, who our students are, what knowledge is relevant for the world of work and beyond, what kinds of students do we want to graduate, and who are we as educators. All these questions (and more) have been around for some time; the current COVID-19 context however brings them even more sharply to the fore. \nThis paper responds to the prompt about how we train professionals for the future so that they don’t participate in systems of oppression and inequality. It was written in 2017 in response to a conference on social and epistemic justice in the wake of the 2015 student protest movements and was written collaboratively by an intergenerational group of educators working on a course in the Engineering and Built Environment (EBE) Faculty at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. All of us have a strong commitment to social justice, and to providing engineering students with an opportunity to think about their professional identity through the lens of community engagement. While written before the onset of COVID-19, we believe that the arguments we make are pertinent to the current context. Drawing on the Honors’ thesis of one member of our group, we sought to reflect on and analyze our work in this context. In particular, the principles of multi-centricity, indigeneity and reflexivity (Dei, 2014) proved useful in making sense of our practice and our work together.","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/ijesjp.v8i2.14395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, higher education is at a crossroads on so many levels: funding, course development, who our students are, what knowledge is relevant for the world of work and beyond, what kinds of students do we want to graduate, and who are we as educators. All these questions (and more) have been around for some time; the current COVID-19 context however brings them even more sharply to the fore. This paper responds to the prompt about how we train professionals for the future so that they don’t participate in systems of oppression and inequality. It was written in 2017 in response to a conference on social and epistemic justice in the wake of the 2015 student protest movements and was written collaboratively by an intergenerational group of educators working on a course in the Engineering and Built Environment (EBE) Faculty at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. All of us have a strong commitment to social justice, and to providing engineering students with an opportunity to think about their professional identity through the lens of community engagement. While written before the onset of COVID-19, we believe that the arguments we make are pertinent to the current context. Drawing on the Honors’ thesis of one member of our group, we sought to reflect on and analyze our work in this context. In particular, the principles of multi-centricity, indigeneity and reflexivity (Dei, 2014) proved useful in making sense of our practice and our work together.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与社会:开普敦大学非殖民化和转型背景下的社区参与教学法
在全球范围内,高等教育正处于许多层面的十字路口:资金、课程开发、我们的学生是谁、哪些知识与工作世界相关、我们希望培养什么样的学生、我们作为教育者是谁。所有这些问题(以及更多问题)已经存在一段时间了;然而,当前的COVID-19背景使这些问题更加突出。本文回应了我们如何培养未来的专业人士,使他们不参与压迫和不平等的制度。它写于2017年,是为了响应2015年学生抗议运动之后的社会和认知正义会议,由南非开普敦大学工程与建筑环境(EBE)学院的一组跨代教育工作者合作编写的。我们所有人都坚定地致力于社会正义,并为工程专业的学生提供一个机会,通过社区参与的视角来思考他们的职业身份。虽然是在2019冠状病毒病发病之前写的,但我们认为,我们提出的论点与当前背景有关。根据我们小组中一名成员的荣誉论文,我们试图在这种背景下反思和分析我们的工作。特别是,多中心、本土化和反身性原则(Dei, 2014)被证明对理解我们的实践和我们的共同工作很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Actioning social justice into the engineering curriculum Autonomía y comunidad: horizonte político de la apropiación tecnológica Autonomía tecnológica: la experiencia de Tosepan Limakxtum en la Sierra Norte de Puebla Diálogos Construcción colectiva de sensores de bajo costo como herramienta para el monitoreo de la calidad del aire y el cuidado de la vida en Puente Aranda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1