Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.1 Organization, Article 60

Hennebel Ludovic, T. Hélène
{"title":"Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.1 Organization, Article 60","authors":"Hennebel Ludovic, T. Hélène","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews Article 60 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR). Article 60 of the ACHR addresses the crucial issue of the Statute and the Rules of Procedure (RoPs) of the Inter-American Court. For international courts and tribunals, probably more so than for domestic organs, the Statute and RoPs are “constitutive” instruments in the first sense of the term. They set the constitutional framework to be respected by the parties and the judge. Therefore, the question of the drafters of these rules is itself fundamental. The answer to this question gives an idea of the greater or lesser degree of autonomy that the States which created the judicial body intended to provide it with.","PeriodicalId":22363,"journal":{"name":"The American Convention on Human Rights","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Convention on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter reviews Article 60 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR). Article 60 of the ACHR addresses the crucial issue of the Statute and the Rules of Procedure (RoPs) of the Inter-American Court. For international courts and tribunals, probably more so than for domestic organs, the Statute and RoPs are “constitutive” instruments in the first sense of the term. They set the constitutional framework to be respected by the parties and the judge. Therefore, the question of the drafters of these rules is itself fundamental. The answer to this question gives an idea of the greater or lesser degree of autonomy that the States which created the judicial body intended to provide it with.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二部分保护手段,第八章美洲人权法院,第1段组织,第六十条
本章审查《美洲人权公约》第60条。《美洲人权公约》第60条涉及美洲法院《规约》和《议事规则》的关键问题。对于国际法院和法庭来说,规约和章程可能比国内机关更具有“构成性”文书的第一意义。他们制定了宪法框架,以得到各方和法官的尊重。因此,这些规则的起草者问题本身就是一个根本问题。对这个问题的回答可以说明,设立司法机构的国家打算给予司法机构多少程度的自治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.1 Organization, Article 55 Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.1 Organization, Article 53 Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VII Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, s.1 Organization, Article 39 Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VII Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, s.1 Organization, Article 38 Part III General and Transitory Provisions, Ch.X Signature, Ratification, Reservations, Amendments, Protocols, and Denunciation, Article 78
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1