Dispersal of blackbird flocks from sunflower fields: efficacy influenced by flock and field size but not drone platform

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 Environmental Science Wildlife Society Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1002/wsb.1478
Conor C. Egan, B. F. Blackwell, E. Fernández‐Juricic, Page E. Klug
{"title":"Dispersal of blackbird flocks from sunflower fields: efficacy influenced by flock and field size but not drone platform","authors":"Conor C. Egan, B. F. Blackwell, E. Fernández‐Juricic, Page E. Klug","doi":"10.1002/wsb.1478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crop depredation by blackbirds (Icteridae) results in substantial economic losses to the United States sunflower industry, and a solution to effectively reduce damage remains elusive. We evaluated the utility of uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS), or drones, as hazing tools to deter foraging blackbirds from commercial sunflower (Helianthus annuus) fields in North Dakota, USA, between September and October 2017. We compared the efficacy of 3 drones: a fixed‐wing predator model mimicking the form of an aerial raptor, a fixed‐wing airplane of similar size, and a multirotor drone. Multirotor drones are relatively easy to fly and are a multifunctional tool for agricultural use; however, they may not be an effective avian deterrent due to a lack of similarity in appearance with natural predators. Free‐ranging blackbird flocks (n = 58) reacted to every drone approach by initiating flight and took flight 1.6 times sooner for the fixed‐wing predator model (flight initiation distance [FID] = 90 m) and 1.8 times sooner for the fixed‐wing airplane (FID = 98 m) compared to the multirotor drone (FID = 55 m). However, the probability of a blackbird flock (n = 53) abandoning a field was greater with smaller field and flock sizes, rather than the specific drone deployed. In an applied setting, the performance of drones as avian hazing devices will likely depend on a combination of factors including platform selection, drone trajectory, duration of use, season, landscape context, and natural history of the pest species.","PeriodicalId":23845,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crop depredation by blackbirds (Icteridae) results in substantial economic losses to the United States sunflower industry, and a solution to effectively reduce damage remains elusive. We evaluated the utility of uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS), or drones, as hazing tools to deter foraging blackbirds from commercial sunflower (Helianthus annuus) fields in North Dakota, USA, between September and October 2017. We compared the efficacy of 3 drones: a fixed‐wing predator model mimicking the form of an aerial raptor, a fixed‐wing airplane of similar size, and a multirotor drone. Multirotor drones are relatively easy to fly and are a multifunctional tool for agricultural use; however, they may not be an effective avian deterrent due to a lack of similarity in appearance with natural predators. Free‐ranging blackbird flocks (n = 58) reacted to every drone approach by initiating flight and took flight 1.6 times sooner for the fixed‐wing predator model (flight initiation distance [FID] = 90 m) and 1.8 times sooner for the fixed‐wing airplane (FID = 98 m) compared to the multirotor drone (FID = 55 m). However, the probability of a blackbird flock (n = 53) abandoning a field was greater with smaller field and flock sizes, rather than the specific drone deployed. In an applied setting, the performance of drones as avian hazing devices will likely depend on a combination of factors including platform selection, drone trajectory, duration of use, season, landscape context, and natural history of the pest species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向日葵田黑鸟群的分散:效果受鸟群和田大小的影响,但不受无人机平台的影响
黑鸟(Icteridae)对作物的掠夺给美国向日葵产业造成了巨大的经济损失,有效减少损害的解决方案仍然难以捉摸。2017年9月至10月期间,我们评估了无人驾驶飞机系统(UAS)或无人机作为欺侮工具的效用,以阻止在美国北达科他州商业向日葵(Helianthus annuus)田野觅食的黑鸟。我们比较了3种无人机的效率:一种是模仿空中猛禽形状的固定翼捕食者模型,一种是类似大小的固定翼飞机,还有一种是多旋翼无人机。多旋翼无人机相对容易飞行,是农业用途的多功能工具;然而,它们可能不是一个有效的鸟类威慑,由于缺乏相似的外观与自然捕食者。自由放牧区的黑鸟群(n = 58)对每次无人机接近都做出反应,开始飞行,固定翼捕食者模型(飞行起始距离[FID] = 90米)比多旋翼无人机(FID = 55米)快1.6倍,固定翼飞机(FID = 98米)比多旋翼无人机(FID = 55米)快1.8倍。然而,一个黑鸟群(n = 53)放弃一个领域的可能性更大,较小的领域和群体规模,而不是特定的无人机部署。在实际应用中,无人机作为鸟类雾霾设备的性能可能取决于多种因素的组合,包括平台选择、无人机轨迹、使用时间、季节、景观环境和害虫物种的自然历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Wildlife Society Bulletin BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Wildlife Society Bulletin is a journal for wildlife practitioners that effectively integrates cutting edge science with management and conservation, and also covers important policy issues, particularly those that focus on the integration of science and policy. Wildlife Society Bulletin includes articles on contemporary wildlife management and conservation, education, administration, law enforcement, and review articles on the philosophy and history of wildlife management and conservation. This includes: Reports on practices designed to achieve wildlife management or conservation goals. Presentation of new techniques or evaluation of techniques for studying or managing wildlife. Retrospective analyses of wildlife management and conservation programs, including the reasons for success or failure. Analyses or reports of wildlife policies, regulations, education, administration, law enforcement. Review articles on the philosophy and history of wildlife management and conservation. as well as other pertinent topics that are deemed more appropriate for the Wildlife Society Bulletin than for The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews that focus on applied research, policy or wildlife management and conservation.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the performance of semiautomated photographic identification programs for leopard seals The use of orthoimagery and stereoscopic aerial imagery to identify muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) houses Pesticide-free management of invasive ants impacting ground-nesting wildlife populations Considerations for a threatened seabird: The impact of shoreline avian predators on at-sea marbled murrelets Abundance estimates of Gunnison's prairie dogs compared to the number of active burrows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1