A comparison of outcomes from a regional Mesothelioma MDT against the National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA) Mesothelioma standards

Maryam Ahmed, J. Lyons, S. Jackson, A. Sharman, M. Dixon, P. Taylor, J. Holme, M. Evison
{"title":"A comparison of outcomes from a regional Mesothelioma MDT against the National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA) Mesothelioma standards","authors":"Maryam Ahmed, J. Lyons, S. Jackson, A. Sharman, M. Dixon, P. Taylor, J. Holme, M. Evison","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA2889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an incurable malignancy with a poor prognosis. In 2014, 43% of patients survived to one year following diagnosis in the UK. There is evidence of patient benefit from regional mesothelioma multidisciplinary team meetings1. The 2016 NLCA Pleural Mesothelioma report defined key recommendations for patients diagnosed with MM in England in 2014. Aims: To evaluate and compare outcomes of patients managed through the Greater Manchester Regional Mesothelioma MDT against the 2016 NLCA findings. Methods: Retrospective review of MM cases discussed at our MDT meeting between April 2016 and February 2018 using data from electronic MDT proformas. Results: Conclusions: Outcomes from our MDT are encouraging and may help build evidence in favour of regional mesothelioma MDTs. In particular, active treatment rates and ensuring equity of access to clinical research appears higher than national figures within this specialist service. References: 1. Bibby, Anna C et al. “What Is the Role of a Specialist Regional Mesothelioma Multidisciplinary Team Meeting? A Service Evaluation of One Tertiary Referral Centre in the UK.” BMJ Open 6.9 (2016): e012092.","PeriodicalId":20113,"journal":{"name":"Pleural and Mediastinal Malignancies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleural and Mediastinal Malignancies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA2889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an incurable malignancy with a poor prognosis. In 2014, 43% of patients survived to one year following diagnosis in the UK. There is evidence of patient benefit from regional mesothelioma multidisciplinary team meetings1. The 2016 NLCA Pleural Mesothelioma report defined key recommendations for patients diagnosed with MM in England in 2014. Aims: To evaluate and compare outcomes of patients managed through the Greater Manchester Regional Mesothelioma MDT against the 2016 NLCA findings. Methods: Retrospective review of MM cases discussed at our MDT meeting between April 2016 and February 2018 using data from electronic MDT proformas. Results: Conclusions: Outcomes from our MDT are encouraging and may help build evidence in favour of regional mesothelioma MDTs. In particular, active treatment rates and ensuring equity of access to clinical research appears higher than national figures within this specialist service. References: 1. Bibby, Anna C et al. “What Is the Role of a Specialist Regional Mesothelioma Multidisciplinary Team Meeting? A Service Evaluation of One Tertiary Referral Centre in the UK.” BMJ Open 6.9 (2016): e012092.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域性间皮瘤MDT与国家肺癌审计(NLCA)间皮瘤标准结果的比较
背景:恶性间皮瘤(MM)是一种无法治愈的恶性肿瘤,预后不良。2014年,在英国,43%的患者在确诊后存活到一年。有证据表明,区域性间皮瘤多学科小组会议对患者有益。2016年NLCA胸膜间皮瘤报告确定了2014年英国诊断为MM的患者的关键建议。目的:评估和比较通过大曼彻斯特地区间皮瘤MDT治疗的患者的结果与2016年NLCA研究结果。方法:回顾性分析2016年4月至2018年2月MDT会议上讨论的MM病例,使用MDT电子表格的数据。结论:我们的MDT的结果是令人鼓舞的,可能有助于建立支持区域间皮瘤MDT的证据。特别是,在这一专业服务中,积极治疗率和确保公平获得临床研究似乎高于全国数字。引用:1。Bibby, Anna C等人,“区域间皮瘤多学科专家小组会议的作用是什么?”英国一家高等教育转诊中心的服务评估。BMJ Open 6.9 (2016): e012092。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing the Success Rate of Pleurodesis with Thoracoscopic Talc Poudrage Combined with Indwelling Pleural Catheter versus Thoracoscopic Talc Poudrage in Patient with Malignant Pleural Effusion, A Randomized, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial Patient derived malignant pleural effusion cell cultures as a platform to understand pleural malignancies and advance personalised treatment Variation in outcomes for M1a Stage Lung cacers- Outcome in Malingnat Pleural Effusion significantly worse than patients with Contralateral Lung Nodules Primary cilium modulates mesothelioma cell viability and 3D sphere formation Intracavitary anaesthesia for medical thoracoscopy: a randomised trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1