Assessing trigeminal microstructure changes in patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia

Elizaveta N. Rozhnova, V. Dashyan, A. S. Tokarev, O. Evdokimova, M. V. Neznanova, M. Sinkin
{"title":"Assessing trigeminal microstructure changes in patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia","authors":"Elizaveta N. Rozhnova, V. Dashyan, A. S. Tokarev, O. Evdokimova, M. V. Neznanova, M. Sinkin","doi":"10.54101/acen.2023.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The crucial role of neuro-vascular conflict (NVC) in trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is getting increasingly challenged. Microstructural changes can be assessed using fractional anisotropy (FA) in diffusion tensor images (DTI). \nObjective. To evaluate usefulness of FA in brain MRI with DTI for TN lateralization assessment. \nMaterials and methods. The study included 51 patients with classical TN divided into two groups: neurosurgical intervention free, post radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and a control group (patients without facial pain). All the patients were tested for NVC with FIESTA (Fast Imaging Employing Steady State Acquisition) brain MRI at 3Т. Difference in thickness of trigeminal roots on the intact and symptomatic sides was assessed for each group. The findings were compared to those in the control group. The MRI protocol was supplemented with DTI. The FA difference in thickness of the intact and symptomatic roots (∆FA) was calculated for each study group to assess microstructural root changes. The results were compared to those in the control group. \nResults. In trigeminal root DTIs, ∆FA over 0.075 [0.029; 0.146] is statistically significant to establish NVC-associated microstructural changes on the symptomatic side in patients without any past surgeries (p = 0,030). In patients with a history of trigeminal ganglion RFA, statistically significant (p = 0.026) thinned symptomatic trigeminal root (difference in thickness of trigeminal roots over 0.45 cm [0.4; 0.6]) was found as compared to that of the control patients. \nConclusion. FA may be used as a quantitative demyelination biomarker in clinical TN. Trigeminal ganglion RFA leads to hypotrophy throughout the trigeminal nerve root.","PeriodicalId":36946,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54101/acen.2023.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The crucial role of neuro-vascular conflict (NVC) in trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is getting increasingly challenged. Microstructural changes can be assessed using fractional anisotropy (FA) in diffusion tensor images (DTI). Objective. To evaluate usefulness of FA in brain MRI with DTI for TN lateralization assessment. Materials and methods. The study included 51 patients with classical TN divided into two groups: neurosurgical intervention free, post radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and a control group (patients without facial pain). All the patients were tested for NVC with FIESTA (Fast Imaging Employing Steady State Acquisition) brain MRI at 3Т. Difference in thickness of trigeminal roots on the intact and symptomatic sides was assessed for each group. The findings were compared to those in the control group. The MRI protocol was supplemented with DTI. The FA difference in thickness of the intact and symptomatic roots (∆FA) was calculated for each study group to assess microstructural root changes. The results were compared to those in the control group. Results. In trigeminal root DTIs, ∆FA over 0.075 [0.029; 0.146] is statistically significant to establish NVC-associated microstructural changes on the symptomatic side in patients without any past surgeries (p = 0,030). In patients with a history of trigeminal ganglion RFA, statistically significant (p = 0.026) thinned symptomatic trigeminal root (difference in thickness of trigeminal roots over 0.45 cm [0.4; 0.6]) was found as compared to that of the control patients. Conclusion. FA may be used as a quantitative demyelination biomarker in clinical TN. Trigeminal ganglion RFA leads to hypotrophy throughout the trigeminal nerve root.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估经典三叉神经痛患者三叉神经微结构的变化
介绍。神经血管冲突(NVC)在三叉神经痛(TN)中的重要作用越来越受到质疑。显微结构变化可以通过扩散张量图像(DTI)中的分数各向异性(FA)来评估。目标。目的:评价FA在DTI脑MRI中对TN偏侧评估的有效性。材料和方法。该研究包括51例经典TN患者,分为两组:无神经外科干预,射频消融(RFA)后,和对照组(无面部疼痛的患者)。所有患者均在3Т上使用FIESTA(快速成像稳态采集)脑MRI检测NVC。评估各组完整侧和症状侧三叉神经根厚度的差异。研究人员将研究结果与对照组的结果进行了比较。MRI方案补充DTI。计算各组完整根和症状根厚度的FA差异(∆FA),以评估根的微观结构变化。结果与对照组的结果进行了比较。结果。三叉神经根DTIs,∆FA > 0.075 [0.029;0.146]在无手术史的患者中,nvc相关症状侧显微结构改变具有统计学意义(p = 0.030)。在有三叉神经节RFA病史的患者中,症状性三叉神经根变薄具有统计学意义(p = 0.026)(三叉神经根厚度大于0.45 cm的差异[0.4;0.6]),与对照组患者相比。结论。FA可作为临床TN定量脱髓鞘生物标志物。三叉神经节RFA可导致整个三叉神经根萎缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Phenotypes of COVID-19-associated dysautonomia in patients requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Optimization of laboratory diagnostics of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: indications and algorithms Postoperative hemorrhages in vestibular schwannoma surgery pontine hemorrhage. Clinical case report Immunomorphologic assessment of changes in functional astroglial proteins in a kainate-induced hippocampal sclerosis model Simultaneous dual-target magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment for patients with tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1