Sampling Biological Populations

IF 0.3 4区 教育学 Q4 BIOLOGY American Biology Teacher Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.2307/4448292
G. Steucek
{"title":"Sampling Biological Populations","authors":"G. Steucek","doi":"10.2307/4448292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perhaps the best way to learn about science is to practice the craft; this is sound pedagogical practice with most disciplines. Students can and should do credible research (Yurkiewicz & Steucek 1970). There is no dearth of problems that beckon our attention. Secondary school and college students represent an enormous resource which could be utilized to conduct research within the confines of science courses. It is no longer possible to teach all that is known about the natural world; emphasis on the process of scientific investigation should not be slighted to squeeze in factual material. On the contrary, the process of scientific investigation should be emphasized, particularly to nonscience majors. Models in biological science have changed dramatically during the past half century, illustrating the limited utility of presenting only factual material. Since many community problems have a biological basis and since students are able to study biological problems relatively easily, the initiation of scientific research in biology courses is appropriate. Moreover, such projects may satisfy local school district goals of a pedagogical nature and prepare students for effective citizenship; perhaps a government/civics teacher could be involved with the definition of a problem. Local health, environmental, agricultural, industrial and scientific researchers represent good sources of important projects; moreover, collaboration with these scientists could be rewarding for all (Spector & White 1985). The initiation of any research project demands that attention be given to the procedure for sampling the population of interest. I will address this problem. Biological science is becoming more quantitative; this is evident in journal articles and in laboratory exercises published in manuals. With this shift from a descriptive to a quantitative presentation, students are often introduced to simple statistical techniques, such as Student's t-test and analysis of variance which are often found in appendixes of laboratory manuals. Interestingly, appropriate sampling procedures are often ignored by these same laboratory manuals. These statistical analyses make assumptions about how data were collected and hence place constraints on the sampling procedure. The use of an appropriate sampling procedure generally takes little time and provides a healthy assurance that the findings will not be discounted on the basis of artifactual bias. This important point should be made to all students of science.","PeriodicalId":50960,"journal":{"name":"American Biology Teacher","volume":"131 1","pages":"278-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Biology Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4448292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perhaps the best way to learn about science is to practice the craft; this is sound pedagogical practice with most disciplines. Students can and should do credible research (Yurkiewicz & Steucek 1970). There is no dearth of problems that beckon our attention. Secondary school and college students represent an enormous resource which could be utilized to conduct research within the confines of science courses. It is no longer possible to teach all that is known about the natural world; emphasis on the process of scientific investigation should not be slighted to squeeze in factual material. On the contrary, the process of scientific investigation should be emphasized, particularly to nonscience majors. Models in biological science have changed dramatically during the past half century, illustrating the limited utility of presenting only factual material. Since many community problems have a biological basis and since students are able to study biological problems relatively easily, the initiation of scientific research in biology courses is appropriate. Moreover, such projects may satisfy local school district goals of a pedagogical nature and prepare students for effective citizenship; perhaps a government/civics teacher could be involved with the definition of a problem. Local health, environmental, agricultural, industrial and scientific researchers represent good sources of important projects; moreover, collaboration with these scientists could be rewarding for all (Spector & White 1985). The initiation of any research project demands that attention be given to the procedure for sampling the population of interest. I will address this problem. Biological science is becoming more quantitative; this is evident in journal articles and in laboratory exercises published in manuals. With this shift from a descriptive to a quantitative presentation, students are often introduced to simple statistical techniques, such as Student's t-test and analysis of variance which are often found in appendixes of laboratory manuals. Interestingly, appropriate sampling procedures are often ignored by these same laboratory manuals. These statistical analyses make assumptions about how data were collected and hence place constraints on the sampling procedure. The use of an appropriate sampling procedure generally takes little time and provides a healthy assurance that the findings will not be discounted on the basis of artifactual bias. This important point should be made to all students of science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
取样生物种群
也许学习科学的最好方法是实践这门手艺;这是大多数学科的良好教学实践。学生可以而且应该做可信的研究(Yurkiewicz & Steucek 1970)。需要我们注意的问题比比皆是。中学生和大学生是一个巨大的资源,可以用来在科学课程的范围内进行研究。我们已经不可能把关于自然世界的一切知识都传授给别人了;强调科学调查的过程不应忽视事实材料。相反,应该强调科学调查的过程,特别是对非理科专业的学生。在过去的半个世纪里,生物科学的模型发生了巨大的变化,这说明了仅呈现事实材料的有限效用。由于许多社区问题都有生物学基础,而且由于学生能够相对容易地研究生物学问题,因此在生物学课程中开始科学研究是合适的。此外,这些项目可以满足当地学区的教学目标,并使学生为有效的公民身份做好准备;也许政府/公民教师可以参与问题的定义。当地的卫生、环境、农业、工业和科学研究人员是重要项目的良好来源;此外,与这些科学家合作对所有人来说都是有益的(Spector & White 1985)。任何研究项目的开始都要求注意对感兴趣的人口进行抽样的程序。我会解决这个问题。生物科学正变得越来越量化;这在期刊文章和手册中发表的实验练习中都很明显。随着从描述性到定量演示的转变,学生们经常被介绍到简单的统计技术,如学生t检验和方差分析,这些通常在实验室手册的附录中找到。有趣的是,这些相同的实验室手册往往忽略了适当的抽样程序。这些统计分析对如何收集数据做出假设,从而对抽样程序施加约束。使用适当的抽样程序通常需要很少的时间,并提供了一种健康的保证,即调查结果不会因人为偏见而打折扣。这一点应该告诉所有理科生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Biology Teacher
American Biology Teacher BIOLOGY-EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: The American Biology Teacher is an award winning and peer-refereed professional journal for K-16 biology teachers. Articles include topics such as modern biology content, biology teaching strategies for both the classroom and laboratory, field activities, and a wide range of assistance for application and professional development. Each issue features reviews of books, classroom technology products, and "Biology Today." Published 9 times a year, the journal also covers the social and ethical implications of biology and ways to incorporate such concerns into instructional programs.
期刊最新文献
A Class Project for Investigating Possible Future Local Effects of Global Climate Change through Student Analysis of Fossil Faunas Simplifying Biology Vocabulary via Morphology Planning to Stay: Burnout, Demoralization, Exploitation, and How to Reclaim Self-Care, Your Classroom, and Your Life … Anyway; Breaking the Mold: Changing the Face of Climate Science and Roar like a Lion: How Animals Can Help You Be Your Best Self The Alpha Female Wolf The “Moonshot” American Science Instruction Really Needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1