Limitations of the Pesticide Management Regulation in Korea

Sangjun Choi
{"title":"Limitations of the Pesticide Management Regulation in Korea","authors":"Sangjun Choi","doi":"10.4172/2329-6879.1000227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Overall amount of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) pesticide sales were reported as 826,688 tons of active ingredients over the period 2000-2010 [1]. In particular, nearly all EU transition countries such as Estonia, the Czech and Slovak Republics and Hungary, showed a strong growth in pesticide purchases over the 2000s, compared to the 1990s. In terms of average pesticide use per unit arable and permanent crop area, Korea ranked as the second largest user of pesticides (12.5 kg/ha) among OECD countries in 2003 [2]. So, in the aspect of safety and health, pesticide is one of the most important chemicals that should be carefully controlled in Korea. For use of pesticide, the main challenge is to reduce the risks to human health and ecosystems, while increasing the level of crop productivity. Since 1985, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) have published the guidelines regarding pesticide management to provide guidance to governments that seek to review, update or design national pesticide legislation [3]. According to this guideline, almost every country has some type of legislation covering pesticides, but many of existing laws have weaknesses. For example, they may not sufficiently reflect the requirements of international agreements or regional initiatives to harmonize requirements, or they may not be adequately connected to new national legislation on environmental protection, chemicals management, or other relevant areas. In this article, limitations of the current pesticide management regulation to protect the health of users from pesticides were discussed based on the previous pesticide studies in Korea.","PeriodicalId":19397,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine and health affairs","volume":"229 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine and health affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6879.1000227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Overall amount of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) pesticide sales were reported as 826,688 tons of active ingredients over the period 2000-2010 [1]. In particular, nearly all EU transition countries such as Estonia, the Czech and Slovak Republics and Hungary, showed a strong growth in pesticide purchases over the 2000s, compared to the 1990s. In terms of average pesticide use per unit arable and permanent crop area, Korea ranked as the second largest user of pesticides (12.5 kg/ha) among OECD countries in 2003 [2]. So, in the aspect of safety and health, pesticide is one of the most important chemicals that should be carefully controlled in Korea. For use of pesticide, the main challenge is to reduce the risks to human health and ecosystems, while increasing the level of crop productivity. Since 1985, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) have published the guidelines regarding pesticide management to provide guidance to governments that seek to review, update or design national pesticide legislation [3]. According to this guideline, almost every country has some type of legislation covering pesticides, but many of existing laws have weaknesses. For example, they may not sufficiently reflect the requirements of international agreements or regional initiatives to harmonize requirements, or they may not be adequately connected to new national legislation on environmental protection, chemicals management, or other relevant areas. In this article, limitations of the current pesticide management regulation to protect the health of users from pesticides were discussed based on the previous pesticide studies in Korea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国农药管理条例的局限性
据报道,在2000-2010年期间,经济合作与发展组织(OECD)农药销售总量为826,688吨有效成分。特别是,几乎所有的欧盟转型国家,如爱沙尼亚、捷克和斯洛伐克共和国以及匈牙利,与20世纪90年代相比,2000年代农药购买量都出现了强劲增长。2003年,以单位耕地和永久作物面积的平均农药使用量为标准,韩国在经合组织(OECD)国家中排名第二(12.5公斤/公顷)。因此,从安全和健康的角度来看,农药是韩国最需要严格控制的化学品之一。对于农药的使用,主要挑战是减少对人类健康和生态系统的风险,同时提高作物生产力水平。自1985年以来,联合国粮食及农业组织(粮农组织)和世界卫生组织(卫生组织)出版了关于农药管理的准则,为寻求审查、更新或设计国家农药立法的各国政府提供指导。根据这一指导方针,几乎每个国家都有某种类型的农药立法,但许多现有法律存在弱点。例如,它们可能没有充分反映国际协定或协调要求的区域倡议的要求,或者它们可能没有适当地与关于环境保护、化学品管理或其他有关领域的新的国家立法联系起来。本文结合韩国以往的农药研究,讨论了现行农药管理法规在保护农药使用者健康方面的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neonatal and Pediatric Medicine The Correct Way to Walk Intraoperative Radiation Exposure of Orthopaedic Surgeons-Mismatch Between Concerns and Protection The Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Daytime Sleepiness on Work Performance: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study in a North African Population Noise Induced Work Places and Noise Related Occupational Risks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1