Is AIO belly board device advantageous in all rectal cancer patients

Q4 Medicine Nowotwory Pub Date : 2018-05-23 DOI:10.5603/NJO.2017.0056
D. Hempel, Joanna Mandrosz, M. Wojtukiewicz, T. Filipowski, E. Sierko
{"title":"Is AIO belly board device advantageous in all rectal cancer patients","authors":"D. Hempel, Joanna Mandrosz, M. Wojtukiewicz, T. Filipowski, E. Sierko","doi":"10.5603/NJO.2017.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. To compare the prone position on a flat table vs an “All in one” belly board device (AIO BBD) in rectal cancer patients (RCPs). Material and methods. Fifteen RCPs scheduled for irradiation were scanned in the two evaluated positions. After tomography, they completed a questionnaire concerning positioning. The dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the small bowel and bladder were compared for both immobilization methods and setup accuracy was analyzed in electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) and X-ray volume imaging (XVI) procedures. Results. AIO BBD was accepted by the majority of RCPs and provided better DVHs for the small bowel than the prone position on a flat table. The setup reproducibility was within tolerance limit for patients with BMI ≤ 29 kg/m2. Patients with obesity regarded AIO BBD as uncomfortable and they presented mean setup shifts out of the tolerance limit in the Y axis — 5.9 mm. Conclusions. The AIO BBD should be recommended for RCPs, especially for those with BMI ≤ 29 kg/m2.","PeriodicalId":39938,"journal":{"name":"Nowotwory","volume":"16 1","pages":"342-348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nowotwory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/NJO.2017.0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. To compare the prone position on a flat table vs an “All in one” belly board device (AIO BBD) in rectal cancer patients (RCPs). Material and methods. Fifteen RCPs scheduled for irradiation were scanned in the two evaluated positions. After tomography, they completed a questionnaire concerning positioning. The dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the small bowel and bladder were compared for both immobilization methods and setup accuracy was analyzed in electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) and X-ray volume imaging (XVI) procedures. Results. AIO BBD was accepted by the majority of RCPs and provided better DVHs for the small bowel than the prone position on a flat table. The setup reproducibility was within tolerance limit for patients with BMI ≤ 29 kg/m2. Patients with obesity regarded AIO BBD as uncomfortable and they presented mean setup shifts out of the tolerance limit in the Y axis — 5.9 mm. Conclusions. The AIO BBD should be recommended for RCPs, especially for those with BMI ≤ 29 kg/m2.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AIO腹板装置是否适用于所有直肠癌患者
目的。比较直肠癌患者(rcp)的俯卧位和“All in one”腹部板装置(AIO BBD)。材料和方法。在两个评估位置扫描15个计划照射的rcp。断层扫描后,他们完成了一份关于体位的问卷。比较了两种固定方法下小肠和膀胱的剂量-体积直方图(DVHs),并分析了电子门静脉成像装置(EPIDs)和x射线体积成像(XVI)程序的设置准确性。结果。AIO BBD被大多数rcp接受,并且比俯卧在平台上提供更好的小肠dvh。对于BMI≤29 kg/m2的患者,设置的重复性在耐受范围内。肥胖患者认为AIO型BBD不舒服,他们在Y轴上的平均设置偏离了耐受极限- 5.9 mm。结论。对于rcp患者,尤其是BMI≤29 kg/m2的患者,应推荐AIO BBD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nowotwory
Nowotwory Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: NOWOTWORY Journal of Oncology publishes papers which cover all aspects of oncology but concentrates on clinical studies, both research orientated and treatment orientated, rather than on laboratory studies. Contributions are also welcomed from the fields of epidemiology, tumor pathology, radiobiology and radiation physics.
期刊最新文献
Once upon a time in oncology – will we definitely win a war against cancer? Critical review of the progresses in cancer therapies Wnt pathways in focus – mapping current clinical trials across cancer spectrum The influence of fluid therapy on short and long – term outcome in patients undergoing liver resection for malignant indications Pharmacological prevention methods in patients with cardiovascular disease with breast cancer – when, how, and for whom? Retrospective analysis of the treatment of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers – the experience of a single-center tertiary institution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1