M. Calafat , T. Lobatón , M. Mañosa , M. Larraín , N. Caballero , E. Cabré , E. Domènech
{"title":"Requerimientos terapéuticos en el tratamiento de mantenimiento de la proctitis ulcerosa","authors":"M. Calafat , T. Lobatón , M. Mañosa , M. Larraín , N. Caballero , E. Cabré , E. Domènech","doi":"10.1016/j.eii.2016.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In population-based studies, ulcerative proctitis (UP) accounts for more than 25% of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and presents distinctive clinical outcomes and therapeutic approaches as compared to left-sided and extensive UC. Our aim was to describe the different therapeutic approaches and health resources used in patients with UP in clinical remission.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective observational study including patients with UP that were followed in our Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol between 1989-2014. Clinical information and the different treatments for the maintenance of remission were recorded, including galenical formulation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 101 patients with UP were included. Median time of follow up was 8 years (IQR 3-14). Most patients were treated with topical mesalazine (especially suppositories) (89%); followed by oral mesalazine (55%). The 33% of patients underwent combined therapy with oral and topical mesalazine. Another 12% were treated with topical steroids for maintenance therapy and 3% of patients required thiopurines. The 10% of patients attended to Emergency Service and 4% were hospitalized for disease activity within follow-up. None of them required colectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Topical mesalazine is the most used maintenance treatment in UP patients in our clinical practice, suggesting both a good acceptance by patients and a high degree of confidence for doctors. UP is associated with a low requirement of health resources, although studies focused on the quality of life are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100473,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal al Día","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 87-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.eii.2016.05.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal al Día","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1696780116300513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
In population-based studies, ulcerative proctitis (UP) accounts for more than 25% of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and presents distinctive clinical outcomes and therapeutic approaches as compared to left-sided and extensive UC. Our aim was to describe the different therapeutic approaches and health resources used in patients with UP in clinical remission.
Material and methods
We performed a retrospective observational study including patients with UP that were followed in our Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol between 1989-2014. Clinical information and the different treatments for the maintenance of remission were recorded, including galenical formulation.
Results
A total of 101 patients with UP were included. Median time of follow up was 8 years (IQR 3-14). Most patients were treated with topical mesalazine (especially suppositories) (89%); followed by oral mesalazine (55%). The 33% of patients underwent combined therapy with oral and topical mesalazine. Another 12% were treated with topical steroids for maintenance therapy and 3% of patients required thiopurines. The 10% of patients attended to Emergency Service and 4% were hospitalized for disease activity within follow-up. None of them required colectomy.
Conclusions
Topical mesalazine is the most used maintenance treatment in UP patients in our clinical practice, suggesting both a good acceptance by patients and a high degree of confidence for doctors. UP is associated with a low requirement of health resources, although studies focused on the quality of life are needed.