Harvesting, postharvest handling, hygiene knowledge and practices of guava fruit farmers: A comparative study of two counties of Kenya

Judith N. Katumbi, J. Imungi, G. Abong’, C. Gachuiri, A. Mwang’ombe, D. Omayio, Joshua Ombaka Owade
{"title":"Harvesting, postharvest handling, hygiene knowledge and practices of guava fruit farmers: A comparative study of two counties of Kenya","authors":"Judith N. Katumbi, J. Imungi, G. Abong’, C. Gachuiri, A. Mwang’ombe, D. Omayio, Joshua Ombaka Owade","doi":"10.5897/AJFS2021.2079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The guava (Psidium guajava) grows on farms or in the bush in many parts of Kenya, including Kitui and Taita Taveta, and remains virtually unattended. Guava fruit value chain is commercially disorganized and standard postharvest handling and storage procedures are not practiced as there is no bulk handling.  This study evaluated the harvesting and postharvest handling practices of the guava fruit in two counties of Kenya. A total of 417 farmers were selected from the two counties (Kitui, n=214 and Taita Taveta, n=203). Using a structured questionnaire, data was collected utilizing Open Data Kit (ODK). Results showed that the main indicative maturity indices in Kitui and Taita Taveta were skin color (98.59 and 92.12%) and full ripe (38.79 and 18.72%) respectively. Results indicated that no packaging was done at farm level as only small quantities were harvested. Storage period was short (< 4 days) mainly to await consumption as reported by 41.6 and 55.2% handlers in Kitui and Taita Taveta, respectively. A cluster analysis of hygiene and postharvest handling practices indicated that Kitui farmers were more knowledgeable (71.9%) as compared to Taita Taveta (49.8%). Additionally, female farmers were more knowledgeable (65.4%) on postharvest handling than males (55.4%). Postharvest handling practices were informal with little packaging, poor hygiene practices, short term storage and informal marketing of small quantities in both Counties. \n \n   \n \n Key words: Guavas, postharvest, preservation, postharvest handling, hygiene, postharvest losses.","PeriodicalId":7509,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Food Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/AJFS2021.2079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The guava (Psidium guajava) grows on farms or in the bush in many parts of Kenya, including Kitui and Taita Taveta, and remains virtually unattended. Guava fruit value chain is commercially disorganized and standard postharvest handling and storage procedures are not practiced as there is no bulk handling.  This study evaluated the harvesting and postharvest handling practices of the guava fruit in two counties of Kenya. A total of 417 farmers were selected from the two counties (Kitui, n=214 and Taita Taveta, n=203). Using a structured questionnaire, data was collected utilizing Open Data Kit (ODK). Results showed that the main indicative maturity indices in Kitui and Taita Taveta were skin color (98.59 and 92.12%) and full ripe (38.79 and 18.72%) respectively. Results indicated that no packaging was done at farm level as only small quantities were harvested. Storage period was short (< 4 days) mainly to await consumption as reported by 41.6 and 55.2% handlers in Kitui and Taita Taveta, respectively. A cluster analysis of hygiene and postharvest handling practices indicated that Kitui farmers were more knowledgeable (71.9%) as compared to Taita Taveta (49.8%). Additionally, female farmers were more knowledgeable (65.4%) on postharvest handling than males (55.4%). Postharvest handling practices were informal with little packaging, poor hygiene practices, short term storage and informal marketing of small quantities in both Counties.   Key words: Guavas, postharvest, preservation, postharvest handling, hygiene, postharvest losses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
番石榴果农的收获、采后处理、卫生知识和实践:肯尼亚两县的比较研究
番石榴(Psidium guajava)生长在肯尼亚许多地方的农场或灌木丛中,包括基图伊和塔塔塔韦塔,几乎无人看管。番石榴的价值链在商业上是混乱的,没有标准的采后处理和储存程序,因为没有散装处理。本研究评估了肯尼亚两个县番石榴果实的收获和采后处理方法。从两个县(Kitui, n=214, Taita Taveta, n=203)共选取了417名农民。采用结构化问卷,利用开放数据工具包(ODK)收集数据。结果表明,基图伊和大塔塔的主要指示性成熟度指标分别为皮色(98.59和92.12%)和全熟(38.79和18.72%)。结果表明,由于只收获了少量,因此没有在农场一级进行包装。储存期较短(< 4天),主要是为了等待食用,分别有41.6%和55.2%的处理者在基图伊和塔塔塔维塔报告。卫生和采后处理做法的聚类分析表明,基图伊农民(71.9%)比塔塔塔维塔农民(49.8%)更有知识。此外,女性农民(65.4%)比男性(55.4%)更了解采后处理。在这两个县,采后处理方法不正规,包装少,卫生习惯差,短期储存和少量非正式销售。关键词:番石榴,采后,保鲜,采后处理,卫生,采后损失
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Production, proximate and sensory analysis of canned fish in tucupi and jambu (Acmella oleracea) sauce Interference of cultivar and ways of cultivation in lettuce (Lactuca sativa) yield and conservation Society Journal Testing Impacts of covid-19 measures on supply and distribution of milk on small-scale processors in Nakuru, Uasin Gishu, and Nyandarua Counties, Kenya Society Journal Testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1