Comparison of behaviour of burnt beams models with effective and actual residual cross-sections in three point bending test

Lucie Keřková Kucíková, M. Šejnoha, T. Janda, P. Padevět
{"title":"Comparison of behaviour of burnt beams models with effective and actual residual cross-sections in three point bending test","authors":"Lucie Keřková Kucíková, M. Šejnoha, T. Janda, P. Padevět","doi":"10.14311/app.2023.40.0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glued laminated timber beams exposed to fire of a variable duration were tested in three point bending. Three types of model geometries taking into account the effect of burning were created. Each model was examined for five material data sets. The maximum deflection obtained from FEM simulations was compared with the corresponding deflection wel derived from a three point bending test of burnt beams. The analysis was performed with the help of Ansys® software limiting attention to a liner elasticity with the maximum applied force Fel selected at the proportionality limit observed experimentally. Majority of FEM models provided smaller deflections compared to measurements except for the material set adopting Young’s moduli from the compression test. The best fit was observed for the material data set obtained from homogenization. No predominant preference among individual geometries was found promoting the computational model based on reduced cross-section as sufficiently accurate.","PeriodicalId":7150,"journal":{"name":"Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14311/app.2023.40.0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glued laminated timber beams exposed to fire of a variable duration were tested in three point bending. Three types of model geometries taking into account the effect of burning were created. Each model was examined for five material data sets. The maximum deflection obtained from FEM simulations was compared with the corresponding deflection wel derived from a three point bending test of burnt beams. The analysis was performed with the help of Ansys® software limiting attention to a liner elasticity with the maximum applied force Fel selected at the proportionality limit observed experimentally. Majority of FEM models provided smaller deflections compared to measurements except for the material set adopting Young’s moduli from the compression test. The best fit was observed for the material data set obtained from homogenization. No predominant preference among individual geometries was found promoting the computational model based on reduced cross-section as sufficiently accurate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三点弯曲试验中有效残余截面与实际残余截面燃烧梁模型的性能比较
胶合层压木梁暴露在一个可变持续时间的火在三点弯曲测试。考虑到燃烧的影响,创建了三种类型的模型几何形状。每个模型都用五个材料数据集进行检验。将有限元模拟得到的最大挠度与燃烧梁三点弯曲试验得到的挠度曲线进行了比较。分析是在Ansys®软件的帮助下进行的,将注意力限制在线性弹性上,在实验观察到的比例极限上选择最大施加力Fel。除了采用压缩试验杨氏模量的材料组外,大多数FEM模型提供的挠度比测量值更小。从均质化中获得的材料数据集观察到最佳拟合。在单个几何形状中,没有发现明显的偏好,可以促进基于简化截面的计算模型足够准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of fibres based on secondary raw materials and their use in concrete technology Effect of preparation process on purity of tricalcium aluminate Production of concrete pavements using mixed cements The carbonation resistance of concrete on the basis of blended binders containing milled limestone Measurement of asphalt concrete base thickness using ultrasonic pulse echo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1