Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Clinical and Therapeutic Review

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE European burn journal Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.3390/ebj3030036
Gonçalo Canhão, S. Pinheiro, L. Cabral
{"title":"Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Clinical and Therapeutic Review","authors":"Gonçalo Canhão, S. Pinheiro, L. Cabral","doi":"10.3390/ebj3030036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis is a rare dermatological condition with high mortality and serious consequences on its survivors. Despite having been first described in 1956, its pathophysiology remains uncertain, mainly regarding its mechanisms, although it seems that certain apoptosis pathways are pivotal in starting keratinocytes’ apoptosis and in activating T cells, especially those mediated by tumour necrosis factor, Fas-FasL and granulysin. In general, its aetiology and presentation are consensual, being defined as a generalized necrolysis of the epidermis that occurs as an uncontrolled immune response to a specific drug or one of its metabolites, highlighting cotrimoxazole and allopurinol as the most important. This necrolysis leads to a massive shedding of the epidermal layer of the skin, with stronger incidences in the torso, upper limbs and face. Its complications tend to be severe, noting that septic ones are responsible for over half of the disease’s mortality. Nearly all survivors develop long-term sequelae, namely hypertrophic scarring and skin pigmentation anomalies. Regarding treatment, many different opinions arise, including contradictory ones, regarding more importantly immunomodulation therapies that have been the focus of several studies through the years. It is safe to state that supportive therapy is the only modality that has significantly strong evidence backing its efficacy in reducing mortality and improving prognosis, which have improved in the past years as general health care quality increased. In conclusion, it is imperative to say that more research is needed for new potential therapies with large study populations and more scientific rigor. Likewise, investigation towards its basic pathophysiology should also be promoted, mainly at a biomolecular level, allowing for an improved prevention of this illness.","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3030036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis is a rare dermatological condition with high mortality and serious consequences on its survivors. Despite having been first described in 1956, its pathophysiology remains uncertain, mainly regarding its mechanisms, although it seems that certain apoptosis pathways are pivotal in starting keratinocytes’ apoptosis and in activating T cells, especially those mediated by tumour necrosis factor, Fas-FasL and granulysin. In general, its aetiology and presentation are consensual, being defined as a generalized necrolysis of the epidermis that occurs as an uncontrolled immune response to a specific drug or one of its metabolites, highlighting cotrimoxazole and allopurinol as the most important. This necrolysis leads to a massive shedding of the epidermal layer of the skin, with stronger incidences in the torso, upper limbs and face. Its complications tend to be severe, noting that septic ones are responsible for over half of the disease’s mortality. Nearly all survivors develop long-term sequelae, namely hypertrophic scarring and skin pigmentation anomalies. Regarding treatment, many different opinions arise, including contradictory ones, regarding more importantly immunomodulation therapies that have been the focus of several studies through the years. It is safe to state that supportive therapy is the only modality that has significantly strong evidence backing its efficacy in reducing mortality and improving prognosis, which have improved in the past years as general health care quality increased. In conclusion, it is imperative to say that more research is needed for new potential therapies with large study populations and more scientific rigor. Likewise, investigation towards its basic pathophysiology should also be promoted, mainly at a biomolecular level, allowing for an improved prevention of this illness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中毒性表皮坏死松解:临床和治疗综述
中毒性表皮坏死松解是一种罕见的皮肤病,死亡率高,对幸存者造成严重后果。尽管1956年首次被描述,但其病理生理仍不确定,主要是关于其机制,尽管某些凋亡途径似乎在启动角质形成细胞凋亡和激活T细胞中起关键作用,特别是由肿瘤坏死因子,Fas-FasL和颗粒蛋白介导的凋亡途径。一般来说,其病因和表现是双方同意的,被定义为对特定药物或其代谢物之一的不受控制的免疫反应而发生的表皮全身性坏死松解,其中强调了新诺明和别嘌呤醇是最重要的。这种坏死松解导致皮肤表皮层大量脱落,躯干、上肢和面部的情况更严重。它的并发症往往很严重,值得注意的是,感染性疾病导致了一半以上的死亡率。几乎所有的幸存者都有长期的后遗症,即增生性疤痕和皮肤色素沉着异常。关于治疗,出现了许多不同的观点,包括相互矛盾的观点,更重要的是免疫调节疗法,多年来一直是几项研究的重点。可以肯定地说,支持治疗是唯一一种有明显有力证据支持其在降低死亡率和改善预后方面的疗效的方式,随着总体卫生保健质量的提高,这方面的效果在过去几年中有所改善。总之,有必要说,需要更多的研究,以大规模的研究人群和更严格的科学方法来寻找新的潜在疗法。同样,也应促进对其基本病理生理学的研究,主要是在生物分子水平上,从而改进对这种疾病的预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Balance Impairment in the Burn Population: A Burn Model System National Database Study Resource Requirements in a Burn Mass Casualty Event Hypnosis in Burn Care: Efficacy, Applications, and Implications for Austere Settings Qualitative Descriptive Research Investigating Burn Survivors’ Perspectives on Quality of Care Aspects European Burns Association (EBA)—Summer 2024 News
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1