Does Religious Holiday Allowance Policy during Covid-19 Provide Legal Certainty?

Q3 Social Sciences Sriwijaya Law Review Pub Date : 2021-01-31 DOI:10.28946/SLREV.VOL5.ISS1.673.PP86-100
Aries Harianto
{"title":"Does Religious Holiday Allowance Policy during Covid-19 Provide Legal Certainty?","authors":"Aries Harianto","doi":"10.28946/SLREV.VOL5.ISS1.673.PP86-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Circular Letter of the Minister of Manpower No. M/6/HI.00.01/V/2020 concerning the Implementation of Religious Holiday Allowance Payment (THR) of 2020 in Companies during Covid-19 Pandemic is a regulation expected to complete THR payment problems in this Pandemic situation. However, normatively, this regulation raises new legal issues. This regulation's provisions contradict the principle of legal certainty because it contradicts the laws and regulations above it. Under the juridical normative type of research, the results of this research found the emergence of legal consequences due to industrial relations disputes for employment relations actors if the agreement on THR Payment is not achieved. This research has also found that the Minister Circular Letter on THR Payment basically contradicted the principle of legal certainty because the status does not belong to the statutory regulations, meaning that it has no force to be applied as statutory regulations do. Based on the Statutory regulation, the minister Circular Letter's legal status only applies to internal institutions which issue and belongs to technical and administrative arrangements. Thus, legal action as research result recommended to the government is revoking the minister's circular letter on THR Payment.","PeriodicalId":32073,"journal":{"name":"Sriwijaya Law Review","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sriwijaya Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28946/SLREV.VOL5.ISS1.673.PP86-100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Circular Letter of the Minister of Manpower No. M/6/HI.00.01/V/2020 concerning the Implementation of Religious Holiday Allowance Payment (THR) of 2020 in Companies during Covid-19 Pandemic is a regulation expected to complete THR payment problems in this Pandemic situation. However, normatively, this regulation raises new legal issues. This regulation's provisions contradict the principle of legal certainty because it contradicts the laws and regulations above it. Under the juridical normative type of research, the results of this research found the emergence of legal consequences due to industrial relations disputes for employment relations actors if the agreement on THR Payment is not achieved. This research has also found that the Minister Circular Letter on THR Payment basically contradicted the principle of legal certainty because the status does not belong to the statutory regulations, meaning that it has no force to be applied as statutory regulations do. Based on the Statutory regulation, the minister Circular Letter's legal status only applies to internal institutions which issue and belongs to technical and administrative arrangements. Thus, legal action as research result recommended to the government is revoking the minister's circular letter on THR Payment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠疫情期间的宗教假期补贴政策是否提供法律确定性?
人力资源部部长通函M/6/HI.00.01/V/2020《关于2020年企业宗教假期津贴支付实施办法》是一项旨在解决本次疫情期间企业宗教假期津贴支付问题的规定。然而,从规范上讲,这一规定引发了新的法律问题。本条例的规定违背了法律确定性原则,因为它与上面的法律法规相矛盾。在司法规范类型的研究下,本研究的结果发现,如果劳动关系行为体没有达成劳资关系支付协议,则会出现劳资关系纠纷导致的法律后果。本研究还发现,《关于支付THR的部长通函》基本上违背了法律确定性原则,因为其地位不属于法定法规,不具有法定法规的适用效力。根据法律规定,部长通函的法律地位仅适用于内部机构,属于技术性和行政性安排。因此,作为研究结果,向政府建议的法律行动是撤销部长关于支付THR的通函。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sriwijaya Law Review
Sriwijaya Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Can the Right to A Good and Healthy Environment be Claimed as a Human Right? Judaization in Palestine: Is It Genocide According to the 1998 Rome Statute? Criminal Legal Protection for Bona Fide Third Parties Over Assets in Corruption and Money Laundering Cases Mapping and Harmonizing Qanun on Sharia Financial Institutions Problematics of Inter-Regional Cooperation in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1