Evaluation of Newborn Direct Bilirubin As Screening for Cholestatic Liver Disease.

IF 2.9 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Biological Chemistry Pub Date : 2023-08-21 eCollection Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/PG9.0000000000000345
Rikah Lerer, Lily Barash, Suhas Nafday, Debora Kogan Liberman, Nadia Ovchinsky
{"title":"Evaluation of Newborn Direct Bilirubin As Screening for Cholestatic Liver Disease.","authors":"Rikah Lerer, Lily Barash, Suhas Nafday, Debora Kogan Liberman, Nadia Ovchinsky","doi":"10.1097/PG9.0000000000000345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biliary atresia (BA) remains the most common indication for pediatric liver transplantation. Early diagnosis is essential for a favorable long-term prognosis for patients with BA. Preliminary data suggests that measurement of direct bilirubin (DB) in newborns may be an effective screening tool for neonatal cholestasis, particularly BA, allowing for early referral and diagnosis. The objective of our study was to establish a cutoff DB value to predict diagnosis of cholestatic liver disease (CLD) with high sensitivity and specificity, as well as, to evaluate whether newborns with elevated DB received appropriate follow-up in our health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline data were collected on infants born between 2016 and 2019 who had serum total bilirubin and DB drawn in the nursery, and who continued to follow in our health system. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were examined using cutoff values of 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 mg/dL for identifying infants at risk for CLD. Patients' charts were reviewed to note whether they had follow-up levels drawn by their pediatrician or by the hepatology team within 2 months of age and whether they were diagnosed with CLD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum total bilirubin and DB levels were drawn from 11 965 infants during their hospitalizations. Three infants from this cohort were diagnosed with CLD: 2 with BA and 1 with Alagille syndrome. DB cutoff values of 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 mg/dL had sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96.83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.69%-97.53%), 99.08% (95% CI, 98.81%-99.30%), and 99.63% (95% CI, 99.4%-99.7%), respectively. Given that a DB of 0.6 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 99%, this value was chosen as the cutoff value to monitor for DB follow-up and diagnosis of CLD. Out of 60 infants who met criteria for DB ≥0.6 mg/dL, only 15 (25%) had a repeat level drawn after nursery discharge; 3 (5%) were eventually diagnosed with CLD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A DB cutoff value of 0.6 mg/dL yielded high sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients with CLD. All 3 patients diagnosed with CLD had elevated DB at hospital discharge. The data revealed that the majority (75%) of eligible newborns did not receive follow-up for their elevated DB in the outpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":8885,"journal":{"name":"Biological Chemistry","volume":"139 1","pages":"e345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PG9.0000000000000345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biliary atresia (BA) remains the most common indication for pediatric liver transplantation. Early diagnosis is essential for a favorable long-term prognosis for patients with BA. Preliminary data suggests that measurement of direct bilirubin (DB) in newborns may be an effective screening tool for neonatal cholestasis, particularly BA, allowing for early referral and diagnosis. The objective of our study was to establish a cutoff DB value to predict diagnosis of cholestatic liver disease (CLD) with high sensitivity and specificity, as well as, to evaluate whether newborns with elevated DB received appropriate follow-up in our health system.

Methods: Baseline data were collected on infants born between 2016 and 2019 who had serum total bilirubin and DB drawn in the nursery, and who continued to follow in our health system. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were examined using cutoff values of 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 mg/dL for identifying infants at risk for CLD. Patients' charts were reviewed to note whether they had follow-up levels drawn by their pediatrician or by the hepatology team within 2 months of age and whether they were diagnosed with CLD.

Results: Serum total bilirubin and DB levels were drawn from 11 965 infants during their hospitalizations. Three infants from this cohort were diagnosed with CLD: 2 with BA and 1 with Alagille syndrome. DB cutoff values of 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 mg/dL had sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96.83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.69%-97.53%), 99.08% (95% CI, 98.81%-99.30%), and 99.63% (95% CI, 99.4%-99.7%), respectively. Given that a DB of 0.6 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 99%, this value was chosen as the cutoff value to monitor for DB follow-up and diagnosis of CLD. Out of 60 infants who met criteria for DB ≥0.6 mg/dL, only 15 (25%) had a repeat level drawn after nursery discharge; 3 (5%) were eventually diagnosed with CLD.

Conclusions: A DB cutoff value of 0.6 mg/dL yielded high sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients with CLD. All 3 patients diagnosed with CLD had elevated DB at hospital discharge. The data revealed that the majority (75%) of eligible newborns did not receive follow-up for their elevated DB in the outpatient setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿直接胆红素筛查胆汁淤积性肝病的评价。
背景:胆道闭锁(BA)仍然是儿童肝移植最常见的适应症。早期诊断对于BA患者良好的长期预后至关重要。初步数据表明,新生儿直接胆红素(DB)的测量可能是新生儿胆汁淤积症的有效筛查工具,特别是BA,允许早期转诊和诊断。本研究的目的是建立一个具有高敏感性和特异性的DB临界值,以预测胆汁淤积性肝病(CLD)的诊断,并评估DB升高的新生儿是否在我们的卫生系统中得到适当的随访。方法:收集2016年至2019年出生的婴儿的基线数据,这些婴儿在托儿所抽取血清总胆红素和DB,并在我们的卫生系统中继续随访。使用0.5、0.6和0.7 mg/dL的临界值检测婴儿CLD风险的敏感性、特异性和阳性和阴性预测值。检查患者的病历,以确定他们是否有儿科医生或肝病小组在2个月内绘制的随访水平,以及他们是否被诊断为CLD。结果:对11 1965例住院婴儿进行血清总胆红素和DB水平测定。该队列中有3名婴儿被诊断为CLD: 2名患有BA, 1名患有Alagille综合征。DB临界值为0.5、0.6和0.7 mg/dL,灵敏度为100%,特异性为96.83%(95%置信区间[CI], 96.69% ~ 97.53%)、99.08% (95% CI, 98.81% ~ 99.30%)和99.63% (95% CI, 99.4% ~ 99.7%)。考虑到0.6 mg/dL的DB敏感性为100%,特异性为99%,因此选择该值作为监测DB随访和诊断CLD的临界值。在60名符合DB≥0.6 mg/dL标准的婴儿中,只有15名(25%)在出院后重复绘制水平;3例(5%)最终诊断为CLD。结论:0.6 mg/dL的DB临界值对于鉴别CLD患者具有较高的敏感性和特异性。3例诊断为CLD的患者出院时DB均升高。数据显示,大多数(75%)符合条件的新生儿在门诊没有接受DB升高的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Chemistry
Biological Chemistry 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Chemistry keeps you up-to-date with all new developments in the molecular life sciences. In addition to original research reports, authoritative reviews written by leading researchers in the field keep you informed about the latest advances in the molecular life sciences. Rapid, yet rigorous reviewing ensures fast access to recent research results of exceptional significance in the biological sciences. Papers are published in a "Just Accepted" format within approx.72 hours of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Protein kinase CK2 contributes to glucose homeostasis. MitoStores: stress-induced aggregation of mitochondrial proteins. Revival of the Escherichia coli heat shock response after two decades with a small Hsp in a critical but distinct act. Bioprospecting hydroxylated chalcones in in vitro model of ischemia-reoxygenation and probing NOX4 interactions via molecular docking. Analysis of kallikrein-related peptidase 7 (KLK7) autolysis reveals novel protease and cytokine substrates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1